Author Topic: VOTE OUT THESE DELEGATES!  (Read 6579 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline jsidhu

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1335
    • View Profile
delegate.cgafeng
btc38.com.crypto-exchange

vote these out
Hired by blockchain | Developer
delegate: dev.sidhujag

Offline BunkerChainLabs-DataSecurityNode

delegate.nathanhourt.com
delegated-proof-of-steak

Both have been offline most of this week.

Any idea why?

We have a total of 4 delegates that are missing blocks now.
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
www.Peerplays.com | Decentralized Gaming Built with Graphene - Now with BookiePro and Sweeps!
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Offline BunkerChainLabs-DataSecurityNode

BUMPITY BUMP BUMP
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
www.Peerplays.com | Decentralized Gaming Built with Graphene - Now with BookiePro and Sweeps!
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Offline BunkerChainLabs-DataSecurityNode


I seems as more Chinese come back into the BitShares old wallets are bringing back delegates that were long voted out.

The list has now grown too the following:

delegate.cgafeng
btc38.com.crypto-exchange
dacx.baozou

In the last 7 days your highest delegate minebitshares-reloaded has dropped 9 places. (More than any other delegate)

Three of your bunkermining delegates have been knocked out of the 101 by btc38.com.crypto-exchange,  dacx.baozou & I think Dev.Nathancourt too? 

While the other problem delegate further up the list delegate.cgafeng has had no movement in the last 7 days (Ergo nothing to do with Chinese opening of wallets...)

My read is that I believe some voters are not happy with bunkermining/so many delegates controlled by 1 person, but they had limited options in the 102-107 range.  I believe if there were viable 3% delegates waiting in the 102-110 range, they would have been voted up instead.

Where does this theory fit in that dead delegates are being voted into the 101?

There are plenty of other candidates that have been listed here and recommended.. yet defunct delegates that had been previously voted out that were chinese based only started to make their way back into the 101 after we had this recent run up on the market.

It is far more likely previous holders of bitshares that left long long ago.. like before we even made our delegate bid.. are now buying up bts again and are not updating their votes.

What exactly is there not to be happy about anyways? Development is underway.. mining pool is operating.. I reported just 6 days about distribution of repayments.

FYI.. one of the delegates now back in the 101 is also a 100% delegate.. who is not doing what they were voted to do.. again.. you seem to be picking convenient parts to make your own personal case here.

Can you do anything to help?

How can we get Chinese to update their votes?

I'm trying to get BitShares to 100% delegate participation.. what are you doing?

I think you specifically are being downvoted and replaced by anything else (100% or not)  that is close enough to replace you in the 102-107 range, unfortunately there are only 100%/dead options close enough to protest with.

Your top delegate has dropped 9 places in week while the problem Chinese problem delegate you mentioned delegate.cgafeng at 36 has not moved at all. 

I was trying to be polite but the evidence is fairly clear imo, but maybe that's just my interpretation.

I'm trying to get BitShares to 100% delegate participation.. what are you doing?

Not very much, while you are doing some very good work.

Please don't take the voting personally. It may just be DPOS at work.

If it is, I would take losing three delegates from the top 101 and your main delegate losing 9 places in a week as a positive because it may be showing voters do care enough about BTS to vote when they really don't agree with something.

Hopefully other shareholders that do agree with your project will see it and support your delegates.

dacx.baozou just fell out of the 101 and was replaced with minebts6.bunkermining-com just in the last hour. What does that mean? Do you take that as some kind of signal? I don't... and here is why.

This has been going since last week... and what I am telling you is out of observation over that entire time. The change ups were always in sync with major gains in the market and it was always chinese based delegates that are dead that got strengthened.

The votes of the 101 are based on % that are dynamic and changing all the time. It generally didn't move much for a long time simply because it was always the same people who were holders.. but like I said.. now we have old holders coming back and disrupting the 101 by not updating their votes.

It is going to be nice in 2.0 when tallies will be done on 24hr cycles instead of with every transaction like it is now.

I still don't understand why you equate this to someone being upset with us operating as we are.

What you say about minebitshares-reloaded dropping only proves my point, if you are taking into account all the factors of how the 101 is calculated and what I am explaining to you here about old wallets now changing the dynamic balance of the 101.

fuzzy.beyondbitcoin has had the exact same movement over the last 7 days as minebitshares-reloaded.. are voters upset to be supporting this too? Is that a signal?
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
www.Peerplays.com | Decentralized Gaming Built with Graphene - Now with BookiePro and Sweeps!
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Offline Empirical1.2

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1366
    • View Profile

I seems as more Chinese come back into the BitShares old wallets are bringing back delegates that were long voted out.

The list has now grown too the following:

delegate.cgafeng
btc38.com.crypto-exchange
dacx.baozou

In the last 7 days your highest delegate minebitshares-reloaded has dropped 9 places. (More than any other delegate)

Three of your bunkermining delegates have been knocked out of the 101 by btc38.com.crypto-exchange,  dacx.baozou & I think Dev.Nathancourt too? 

While the other problem delegate further up the list delegate.cgafeng has had no movement in the last 7 days (Ergo nothing to do with Chinese opening of wallets...)

My read is that I believe some voters are not happy with bunkermining/so many delegates controlled by 1 person, but they had limited options in the 102-107 range.  I believe if there were viable 3% delegates waiting in the 102-110 range, they would have been voted up instead.

Where does this theory fit in that dead delegates are being voted into the 101?

There are plenty of other candidates that have been listed here and recommended.. yet defunct delegates that had been previously voted out that were chinese based only started to make their way back into the 101 after we had this recent run up on the market.

It is far more likely previous holders of bitshares that left long long ago.. like before we even made our delegate bid.. are now buying up bts again and are not updating their votes.

What exactly is there not to be happy about anyways? Development is underway.. mining pool is operating.. I reported just 6 days about distribution of repayments.

FYI.. one of the delegates now back in the 101 is also a 100% delegate.. who is not doing what they were voted to do.. again.. you seem to be picking convenient parts to make your own personal case here.

Can you do anything to help?

How can we get Chinese to update their votes?

I'm trying to get BitShares to 100% delegate participation.. what are you doing?

I think you specifically are being downvoted and replaced by anything else (100% or not)  that is close enough to replace you in the 102-107 range, unfortunately there are only 100%/dead options close enough to protest with.

Your top delegate has dropped 9 places in week while the problem Chinese problem delegate you mentioned delegate.cgafeng at 36 has not moved at all. 

I was trying to be polite but the evidence is fairly clear imo, but maybe that's just my interpretation.

I'm trying to get BitShares to 100% delegate participation.. what are you doing?

Not very much, while you are doing some very good work.

Please don't take the voting personally. It may just be DPOS at work.

If it is, I would take losing three delegates from the top 101 and your main delegate losing 9 places in a week as a positive because it may be showing voters do care enough about BTS to vote when they really don't agree with something.

Hopefully other shareholders that do agree with your project will see it and support your delegates.

« Last Edit: September 19, 2015, 02:10:15 am by Empirical1.2 »
If you want to take the island burn the boats

Offline BunkerChainLabs-DataSecurityNode


I seems as more Chinese come back into the BitShares old wallets are bringing back delegates that were long voted out.

The list has now grown too the following:

delegate.cgafeng
btc38.com.crypto-exchange
dacx.baozou

In the last 7 days your highest delegate minebitshares-reloaded has dropped 9 places. (More than any other delegate)

Three of your bunkermining delegates have been knocked out of the 101 by btc38.com.crypto-exchange,  dacx.baozou & I think Dev.Nathancourt too? 

While the other problem delegate further up the list delegate.cgafeng has had no movement in the last 7 days (Ergo nothing to do with Chinese opening of wallets...)

My read is that I believe some voters are not happy with bunkermining/so many delegates controlled by 1 person, but they had limited options in the 102-107 range.  I believe if there were viable 3% delegates waiting in the 102-110 range, they would have been voted up instead.

Where does this theory fit in that dead delegates are being voted into the 101?

There are plenty of other candidates that have been listed here and recommended.. yet defunct delegates that had been previously voted out that were chinese based only started to make their way back into the 101 after we had this recent run up on the market.

It is far more likely previous holders of bitshares that left long long ago.. like before we even made our delegate bid.. are now buying up bts again and are not updating their votes.

What exactly is there not to be happy about anyways? Development is underway.. mining pool is operating.. I reported just 6 days about distribution of repayments.

FYI.. one of the delegates now back in the 101 is also a 100% delegate.. who is not doing what they were voted to do.. again.. you seem to be picking convenient parts to make your own personal case here.

Can you do anything to help?

How can we get Chinese to update their votes?

I'm trying to get BitShares to 100% delegate participation.. what are you doing?
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
www.Peerplays.com | Decentralized Gaming Built with Graphene - Now with BookiePro and Sweeps!
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Offline Empirical1.2

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1366
    • View Profile

I seems as more Chinese come back into the BitShares old wallets are bringing back delegates that were long voted out.

The list has now grown too the following:

delegate.cgafeng
btc38.com.crypto-exchange
dacx.baozou

In the last 7 days your highest delegate minebitshares-reloaded has dropped 9 places. (More than any other delegate)

Three of your bunkermining delegates have been knocked out of the 101 by btc38.com.crypto-exchange,  dacx.baozou & I think Dev.Nathancourt too? 

While the other problem delegate further up the list delegate.cgafeng has had no movement in the last 7 days (Ergo nothing to do with Chinese opening of wallets...)

My read is that I believe some voters are not happy with bunkermining/so many delegates controlled by 1 person, but they had limited options in the 102-107 range.  I believe if there were viable 3% delegates waiting in the 102-110 range, they would have been voted up instead. 


« Last Edit: September 19, 2015, 01:30:12 am by Empirical1.2 »
If you want to take the island burn the boats

Offline Brekyrself

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 512
    • View Profile
DataSecurityNode

Can you publish your slate?  You have been really on top of the delegates throughout this journey.

Offline BunkerChainLabs-DataSecurityNode

BUMP

Can someone please reach out to the Chinese community to make them aware of this?
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
www.Peerplays.com | Decentralized Gaming Built with Graphene - Now with BookiePro and Sweeps!
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Offline BunkerChainLabs-DataSecurityNode

I seems as more Chinese come back into the BitShares old wallets are bringing back delegates that were long voted out.

The list has now grown too the following:

delegate.cgafeng
btc38.com.crypto-exchange
dacx.baozou

Fair warning to everyone, I am going to continue to bump this thread until I see this trend reverse. These delegates are actually rising in the 101 when they should be going down.

I am again urging anybody who has contacts in the Chinese community to please talk to them to update their votes. Reference this thread so that they can find their way to where delegate proposals to consider... or at least vote for some replacements.

OR.. remove their votes.

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
www.Peerplays.com | Decentralized Gaming Built with Graphene - Now with BookiePro and Sweeps!
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Offline BunkerChainLabs-DataSecurityNode

BUMP!

btc38.com.crypto-exchange is back into the 101.

Someone really needs to reach out the Chinese community and tell them to update their votes. Both of these delegates are Chinese based and if they will updates their votes we can have them removed.

Can anybody do that?
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
www.Peerplays.com | Decentralized Gaming Built with Graphene - Now with BookiePro and Sweeps!
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

38PTSWarrior

  • Guest
I will throw in 2 MKR for a nice little vote shifting campaign

38PTSWarrior

  • Guest
This would help me too.

Offline emailtooaj

@data
I hate to ask this, but seeing you're on top of this, if you got some spare time would you mind listing the top dead/inactive delegates. I know this will help me to clean house and maybe others?

I'll send u some bts, just pm you're address
« Last Edit: September 13, 2015, 04:44:53 pm by emailtooaj »
Sound Editor of Beyondbitcoin Hangouts. Listen to latest here - https://beyondbitcoin.org support the Hangouts! BTS Tri-Fold Brochure https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,15169.0.html
Tip BROWNIE.PTS to EMAILTOOAJ

38PTSWarrior

  • Guest
Good overall analyzis I think. Update vote and don't forget the 101-140 sisters and brothers.
« Last Edit: September 13, 2015, 02:18:14 pm by 38PTSWarrior »