Author Topic: Metrics to distinguish blockchain development companies  (Read 2189 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.


Offline santaclause102

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2486
    • View Profile
Thanks a lot everyone!! Updated. Check it out!

Offline r0ach

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 93
    • View Profile
The main 2 problems of Bitcoin that Bitshares solves is scalability and price stability with market pegged assets, since nobody wants to hold coins with unstable price.

Offline BunkerChainLabs-DataSecurityNode

Extensible API
Open Source
Energy Efficiency
Community Support
Politically and Culturally Agnostic
Multilingual Support
IPv6 Support
Well Documented
User Security Centric (ie. help end users secure their account with proper password and backup protocols)
« Last Edit: October 02, 2015, 12:40:58 am by DataSecurityNode »
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
www.Peerplays.com | Decentralized Gaming Built with Graphene - Now with BookiePro and Sweeps!
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Offline liondani

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3737
  • Inch by inch, play by play
    • View Profile
    • My detailed info
  • BitShares: liondani
  • GitHub: liondani

Offline Ander

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3506
    • View Profile
  • BitShares: Ander
Rate of inflation of the blockchain store of value token.
https://metaexchange.info | Bitcoin<->Altcoin exchange | Instant | Safe | Low spreads

Offline donkeypong

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2329
    • View Profile

Offline Stan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2908
  • You need to think BIGGER, Pinky...
    • View Profile
    • Cryptonomex
  • BitShares: Stan
Please brainstorm with me... 

What are the metrics that distinguish the various blockchain / distributed ledger tech stacks:

At the moment I have:

- Public/Private/Public and private blockchains
- turing complete or not 
- scalability (transaction throughput, settlement speed, cost efficiency)

Please don't be afraid to suggest metrics that let CNX look bad! Being realistic creates trust.

In a table it looks like this: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1DxMu13EYH1fB0HWYyagWD1IlXhmy4SnRXJjiCyHs3AM/edit?usp=sharing

It will be part of a pitch we are creating to be used in China..

Governance model.
Built-in features.
Network effect (number of users).
Economic diversity (number and type of service providers)
Attractiveness to developers (tools and compensation).
Self-funding ability / profitability
Support for regulatory compliance needs.
Viral / referral incentives.



Anything said on these forums does not constitute an intent to create a legal obligation or contract of any kind.   These are merely my opinions which I reserve the right to change at any time.

Offline santaclause102

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2486
    • View Profile
Please brainstorm with me... 

What are the metrics that distinguish the various blockchain / distributed ledger tech stacks:

At the moment I have:


Development support for public / private blockchains
Development support for regulatory compliant blockchains
Open Source
IP protected
Scalability (transaction throughput, settlement speed, cost efficiency)
Scope: Amount of applications possible (without meta protocols)
Governance and self funding ability for public blockchains
Virality potential
External developer tools and documentation as of today


Please don't be afraid to suggest metrics that let CNX look bad! Being realistic creates trust.

In a table it looks like this: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1DxMu13EYH1fB0HWYyagWD1IlXhmy4SnRXJjiCyHs3AM/edit?usp=sharing

It will be part of a pitch we are creating to be used in China..
« Last Edit: October 02, 2015, 10:51:09 am by delulo »