The Final Countdown!

[emailtooaj]

Dude...lol. You're the meme of meme's.
Love it!

[twentythree]

did someone know when shape shift will get back with bitshares?

[bitmeat]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XAg5KjnAhuU

[pseudoscops]

Well done guys!

[Tuck Fheman]

[twentythree]

only when i try to backup on mac client it freeze and nothing happens. and i see no backup file that would be created.

but seems to work now on both web wallet and client. including value of old account

[bytemaster]

https://bitshares.openledger.info/

[Thom]

Good PR consists of all those little details that sum up into the overall perception.

This just highlights one of the teams greatest weaknesses IMO - communicating the important details.

[Thom]

Is that "now" part of the repository name?

No.

Code: [Select]

#!/bin/bash
git clone https://github.com/bitshares/bitshares-2 /home/admin/BitShares2_build
git fetch --all
###git checkout bitshares-2 && git pull    ######## Removed this checkout line on 2nd attempt below
git submodule update --init --recursive


You must cd into /home/admin/BitShares2_build after cloning the repo, otherwise git will try to fetch in the current dir.

Thanks PC, building now. I guess I need to get more familiar with git. So different from other src code systems I've used before, like svc.

Would have been nice to use wackou's build tools, but I believe the root repository is built in and is set to github/cryptonomex. You can build any tag from that, but I don't think it works for an entirely different repository. I could be mistaken tho.

I started off from the assumption the build was the latest master, just like the testnet. It just really puzzles me why I seem to be the only one that can't read between the lines around here and "intuit" that the repo was changed or that cryptonomex would build the binaries or or or

Anyway, past that thanks to you & xeroc, onward and upward! 50% of build process complete...

[jakub]

Can the bitshares homepage be updating with a message saying the the transition in progress, please check back today for further instructions or something?

 
Let's take care of the PR side of things.
Definitely there should be a message on the website explaining what's going on right now for those who are unable to follow the forum so closely as we do.

Updating the website will probably take 5-10 minutes and if that saves just one user from being confused or frustrated - it's worth it.
Good PR consists of all those little details that sum up into the overall perception.

EDIT: I can see it's done already 

[twentythree]

cool already downloaded it. can i restore my web wallet on the client?

[pc]

Is that "now" part of the repository name?

No.

Code: [Select]

#!/bin/bash
git clone https://github.com/bitshares/bitshares-2 /home/admin/BitShares2_build
git fetch --all
###git checkout bitshares-2 && git pull    ######## Removed this checkout line on 2nd attempt below
git submodule update --init --recursive


You must cd into /home/admin/BitShares2_build after cloning the repo, otherwise git will try to fetch in the current dir.

[twentythree]

will we get a new client later? or did we get only new web wallet for the beginning?

[Thom]

Is this normal, can it be safely ignored? I wouldn't have mentioned it if were only a warning, but it says error..

Code: [Select]

[ 81%] Building CXX object libraries/app/CMakeFiles/graphene_app.dir/plugin.cpp.o
/home/admin/BitShares2_build/libraries/app/application.cpp: In lambda function:
/home/admin/BitShares2_build/libraries/app/application.cpp:277:16: error: ‘genesis’ was not declared in this scope
                genesis.initial_chain_id = fc::sha256::hash( egenesis_json );
                ^

No, the build failed using the same method as I have always used.

you are sure you have pulled the most recent version?

Here are the commands used:

git clone https://github.com/cryptonomex/graphene.git "/home/admin/BitShares2_build
git fetch --all
git checkout master && git pull

git submodule update --init --recursive

the repository is github.com/bitshares/bitshares-2 now .. you need to follow the submodule procedure again too

This throws me off, didn't expect a new build process. Is that "now" part of the repository name? I put these commands in a shell script but something is not right apparently. See what I mean about being explicit?

Code: [Select]

#!/bin/bash
git clone https://github.com/bitshares/bitshares-2 /home/admin/BitShares2_build
git fetch --all
###git checkout bitshares-2 && git pull    ######## Removed this checkout line on 2nd attempt below
git submodule update --init --recursive

With checkout...

Code: [Select]

admin@seed07:~$ ./buildIt
Cloning into '/home/admin/BitShares2_build'...
remote: Counting objects: 10363, done.
remote: Compressing objects: 100% (1002/1002), done.
remote: Total 10363 (delta 670), reused 0 (delta 0), pack-reused 9269
Receiving objects: 100% (10363/10363), 16.41 MiB | 4.37 MiB/s, done.
Resolving deltas: 100% (7124/7124), done.
Checking connectivity... done.
fatal: Not a git repository (or any of the parent directories): .git
fatal: Not a git repository (or any of the parent directories): .git

Without checkout...
admin@seed07:~$ rm -rf BitShares2_build/*
admin@seed07:~$ rm -rf BitShares2_build/.git*
admin@seed07:~$ nano buildIt
admin@seed07:~$ ./buildIt
Cloning into '/home/admin/BitShares2_build'...
remote: Counting objects: 10363, done.
remote: Compressing objects: 100% (1002/1002), done.
remote: Total 10363 (delta 670), reused 0 (delta 0), pack-reused 9269
Receiving objects: 100% (10363/10363), 16.41 MiB | 5.98 MiB/s, done.
Resolving deltas: 100% (7124/7124), done.
Checking connectivity... done.
fatal: Not a git repository (or any of the parent directories): .git
fatal: Not a git repository (or any of the parent directories): .git
fatal: Not a git repository (or any of the parent directories): .git


[xeroc]

Happy New Year!!

made me lol

[38PTSWarrior]

Happy New Year!!

[xeroc]

Is this normal, can it be safely ignored? I wouldn't have mentioned it if were only a warning, but it says error..

Code: [Select]

[ 81%] Building CXX object libraries/app/CMakeFiles/graphene_app.dir/plugin.cpp.o
/home/admin/BitShares2_build/libraries/app/application.cpp: In lambda function:
/home/admin/BitShares2_build/libraries/app/application.cpp:277:16: error: ‘genesis’ was not declared in this scope
                genesis.initial_chain_id = fc::sha256::hash( egenesis_json );
                ^

No, the build failed using the same method as I have always used.

you are sure you have pulled the most recent version?

Here are the commands used:

git clone https://github.com/cryptonomex/graphene.git "/home/admin/BitShares2_build
git fetch --all
git checkout master && git pull

git submodule update --init --recursive

the repository is github.com/bitshares/bitshares-2 now .. you need to follow the submodule procedure again too

[Thom]

Is this normal, can it be safely ignored? I wouldn't have mentioned it if were only a warning, but it says error..

Code: [Select]

[ 81%] Building CXX object libraries/app/CMakeFiles/graphene_app.dir/plugin.cpp.o
/home/admin/BitShares2_build/libraries/app/application.cpp: In lambda function:
/home/admin/BitShares2_build/libraries/app/application.cpp:277:16: error: ‘genesis’ was not declared in this scope
                genesis.initial_chain_id = fc::sha256::hash( egenesis_json );
                ^

No, the build failed using the same method as I have always used.

you are sure you have pulled the most recent version?

Here are the commands used:

git clone https://github.com/cryptonomex/graphene.git "/home/admin/BitShares2_build
git fetch --all
git checkout master && git pull
git submodule update --init --recursive

The /home/admin/BitShares2_build folder was completely empty according to "ls -lsa".

[Pheonike]

Can the bitshares homepage be updating with a message saying the the transition in progress, please check back today for further instructions or something?

[xeroc]

Is this normal, can it be safely ignored? I wouldn't have mentioned it if were only a warning, but it says error..

Code: [Select]

[ 81%] Building CXX object libraries/app/CMakeFiles/graphene_app.dir/plugin.cpp.o
/home/admin/BitShares2_build/libraries/app/application.cpp: In lambda function:
/home/admin/BitShares2_build/libraries/app/application.cpp:277:16: error: ‘genesis’ was not declared in this scope
                genesis.initial_chain_id = fc::sha256::hash( egenesis_json );
                ^

No, the build failed using the same method as I have always used.

you are sure you have pulled the most recent version?

[Thom]

Is this normal, can it be safely ignored? I wouldn't have mentioned it if were only a warning, but it says error..

Code: [Select]

[ 81%] Building CXX object libraries/app/CMakeFiles/graphene_app.dir/plugin.cpp.o
/home/admin/BitShares2_build/libraries/app/application.cpp: In lambda function:
/home/admin/BitShares2_build/libraries/app/application.cpp:277:16: error: ‘genesis’ was not declared in this scope
                genesis.initial_chain_id = fc::sha256::hash( egenesis_json );
                ^

No, the build failed using the same method as I have always used.

Anyone else seeing this error?

[speedy]

Is https://graphene.bitshares.org going to switch to the real 2.0 blockchain, or do we have to wait for Openledger to see a webwallet?

[Thom]

Now that's explicit!

Thanks. I found libraries/egenesis in the build tree so I kindof figured that was the case. Build is 65% complete. I will start it as seed07 and deploy to the other 3 nodes once it is built. I presume that's what you meant by "join".

[bytemaster]

I still don't get it exactly, what BM means by "join" and where the genesis is.

I am just building src from the master, clean get of lastest. Looking at the src tree now to "find the genesis", if it needs to be pulled out as a separate file like in the testnet. Based on posts I saw yesterday that seems unlikely. I just like things to be explicit, makes life so much easier!

There is no need to specify a genesis file in the release.  It is built into the binary.

[Thom]

I still don't get it exactly, what BM means by "join" and where the genesis is.

I am just building src from the master, clean get of lastest. Looking at the src tree now to "find the genesis", if it needs to be pulled out as a separate file like in the testnet. Based on posts I saw yesterday that seems unlikely. I just like things to be explicit, makes life so much easier!

[fav]

Could you be more specific?

I just looked on github but it wasn't clear where this genesis is.

Is it a matter of just building from master and it will be included within the binaries produced?

in the source package you can download

[Thom]

Could you be more specific?

I just looked on github but it wasn't clear where this genesis is.

Is it a matter of just building from master and it will be included within the binaries produced?

[bytemaster]

Genesis file has been checked into github.   Waiting for witnesses to join so they can be voted in.

[neo_lee]

good luck

[liondani]

The last bts1 block number is ?

3826419

I am shutting down my 0.9.3c server now. Regardless if your client is still "on", no blocks are bing produced. I always intended to stop it when 2.0 was launched, but it doesn't appear any blocks are being produced anyway, regardless of the client running or not.

BSB also confirms this.

Correction, blocks are still being produced on 1.0, but I am shutting down my server now anyway.

I am confused!!!  This block is after the snapshot! Not?
Which was the last bts1 block before the snapshot?

[monsterer]

Perhaps this thread should have been called 'The penultimate countdown'?

[sudo]

can‘t wait to see

[fav]

Europe is watching the progress 4 1/2 hours left

 

[GChicken]

God speed Cryptonomex.. i will see you in the morning... (well it's already the morning but after after my  3 1/2 hours of sleep, my alarm co-insides with the launch ).

very tempted to take the day off work..

p.s Batman is doing the usaine bolt pose, it just not fully formed yet

[roadscape]

Come on

Google trend analysis for "Bitshares"
https://www.google.com/trends/explore#q=bitshares

The chart above does not include the last few days as far as i know... it will be interesting to see how we are trending in a weeks time; we are definitely heading in the right direction!!

Why is Batman giving us the finger?

lmao

[GChicken]

Why wasn't the countdown set for the actual launch of the 2.0 chain instead of the demise of the 1.0 chain?

was the countdown set for the time of the snapshot...?
when i check the EST time at the moment it is 10AM, BM suggested in a blog post that 'The actual snapshot time will be the last block prior to 9:00:00AM EST.'

countdown finished 2 hours ago...  i think he must have meant EDT which is the timezone observed in Blacksburg at the moment (currently 11:18am) which coincides with the time

soon what the time was linked to will be irrelevant and we all sing hallelujah and live happily ever after

[Thom]

The last bts1 block number is ?

3826419

I am shutting down my 0.9.3c server now. Regardless if your client is still "on", no blocks are bing produced. I always intended to stop it when 2.0 was launched, but it doesn't appear any blocks are being produced anyway, regardless of the client running or not.

BSB also confirms this.

Correction, blocks are still being produced on 1.0, but I am shutting down my server now anyway.

[puppies]

Why wasn't the countdown set for the actual launch of the 2.0 chain instead of the demise of the 1.0 chain?

I think getting people to stop accepting bts1.0 at the snapshot point was probably considered more important.

[inarizushi]

Why wasn't the countdown set for the actual launch of the 2.0 chain instead of the demise of the 1.0 chain?

Yeah having to stare at this 00:00:00 countdown is surely disappointing, and many poloniex users seem to think that BTS 2.0 is delayed. But who cares, if they sell, it's good for the buyers anyway.

[Riverhead]

Come on

Google trend analysis for "Bitshares"
https://www.google.com/trends/explore#q=bitshares

The chart above does not include the last few days as far as i know... it will be interesting to see how we are trending in a weeks time; we are definitely heading in the right direction!!

Why is Batman giving us the finger?

[monsterer]

Why wasn't the countdown set for the actual launch of the 2.0 chain instead of the demise of the 1.0 chain?

[GChicken]

Come on  

Google trend analysis for "Bitshares"
https://www.google.com/trends/explore#q=bitshares

The chart above does not include the last few days as far as i know... it will be interesting to see how we are trending in a weeks time; we are definitely heading in the right direction!!

[mangou007]

Come on  

[GChicken]

304 users online today, hopefully by launch we can beat 373... come on!

[puppies]

Are we there yet?

[bitacer]

  I have just updated my ring tone to it ! 

[kingjohal]

History in the making!

[GChicken]

I'm sure this has been answered before... but what about all the non upgraded delegates that are still producing bts 0.9.x blocks?  Are there 2 chains running?

Second chain is not up at the moment although if the snapshot has been taken which i believe i has (but not sure) all BTS transfer on the old BTS 1.0 chain is considered worthless / less valuable as any new owner of BTS after the snapshot occurred will not have a 1:1 peg with BTS 2.0 and therefore will only own the BTS from v1...

that's how i understand it anyway, can someone comment or correct me if i am wrong..

Thank You

[lil_jay890]

I'm sure this has been answered before... but what about all the non upgraded delegates that are still producing bts 0.9.x blocks?  Are there 2 chains running?

[BunkerChainLabs-DataSecurityNode]

We took all delegates of 1.0 offline at the bunker at 9am EST.

We are totally ready to CHANGE EVERYTHING with BitShares 2.0!!!

[sudo]

gogogo！！！！！

[Average Guy on Street]

So is the launch happening about 5pm Eastern Standard Time?

[CalabiYau]

GO GRAPHENE GO 

[cube]

We had a Countdown Party at the Telegram.  It was fun.

[Ben Mason]

Incredibly exited....can't sit still! 

[roadscape]

[iHashFury]

    

[Overthetop]

 

[bytemaster]

Our plan allowed us about 7 hours to deploy after the snapshot.

We have the genesis file and are doing verification / sanity checks on it now.

[MJK]

Someone with some photoshop skills should give BM a Joey Tempest perm

Here's to a successful 2.0 launch 

[twentythree]

run 2.0 only on browser or did we get some new client? how long must we wait?

[xeroc]

..
unfortunatelly my blockchain on the delegate already has one extra block .. so I cannot construct a torrent to seed the blockchain until the snapshot ..
if someone else constructs a torrent .. I have a machine that can seed

[lovejoy]

The dawn of a new era!   

[dichalcog3nid3]

Space Age Tower of Babel

The wise people of the world will understand that this prophetic fulfillment is the catalyst to finally bring peace and harmony, justice and righteousness to the world.

"I have set my space elevator in the clouds, and it will be the sign of the covenant between me and the earth."

[phillyguy]

will there be a confirmation of snapshot? Is there a consensus best wallet/web wallet available later today?

[lakerta06]

What happended now?

Financial world has changed.

[Moon]

ok,let's go!

[029xue]

What happended now?

[Chris4210]

its time to wait a bit.

Which wallets are you going to use guys?

[logxing]

The last bts1 block number is ?

[monsterer]

Now what?

The counter shows 0 seconds, the page still has 'email me when ready' on it, and the download page still links to 1.0?

https://bitshares.org/download/

[emski]

Was Block # 3826176 included or excluded ?
It was produced exactly at cutoff time ?

[x0ep]

Happy New year!!!! +5%+5%+5%+5%+5%+5%+5%+5%+5%

[lzr1900]

2.0!!!!!!!

[betax]

 

[GChicken]

The counter has ran out... 0:0:00:00

Woot woot, bring on 2.0

[canucklehead]

congrats!

[spartako]

 

[emailtooaj]

Lol, nice!

[bytemaster]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9jK-NcRmVcw