Proxy: fav - Journal

[fav]

added wackou to watch list, looks like they fixed their witness. I'll monitor their performance for 24 hours and vote again

[wackou]

Can't fix my script now, so I decided to stop publishing feeds instead of publishing wrong ones / with undesirable parameters. Will fix it asap (tomorrow at the latest)

[fav]

deleted vote for wackou

- failed to publish feeds. (last 20 hours ago)
- does not follow current witness settings



@Xeldal you seem to have problems with feed publishing too

[fav]

Thanks fav. Looks like riverhead got fired though

What happened?

Just not enough votes. Now that I'm home and can focus on getting feeds running (using Xeroc's tools currently) and witness node monitoring, etc. I can start to campaign for votes.

are you in the telegram group?

[Riverhead]

Thanks fav. Looks like riverhead got fired though

What happened?

Just not enough votes. Now that I'm home and can focus on getting feeds running (using Xeroc's tools currently) and witness node monitoring, etc. I can start to campaign for votes.

[fav]

bump!

[iHashFury]

Thanks for supporting witness 'delegate.ihashfury' 

[fav]

bump!

[BunkerChainLabs-DataSecurityNode]

Update:

commmittee mindphlux unnvoted, proposal went through


also, I decided to vote in rnglab and datasecuritynode, currently 19/17 voted in. I will try to slim down to 17 over time / filter out bad performers

Thanks fav! 

[fav]

Update:

commmittee mindphlux unnvoted, proposal went through


also, I decided to vote in rnglab and datasecuritynode, currently 19/17 voted in. I will try to slim down to 17 over time / filter out bad performers

[BunkerChainLabs-DataSecurityNode]

I am not sure what to say here.. technically I couldn't get 'on' the testnet because I was stuck at the same issue that had me stuck until now with no wallet.. have 130k+ private keys stopped me... but I eventually did contribute and generated a bug report during testnet.. so does that mean I was in testnet?

Anyways.. please add me for nuclear bunker network protection: datasecuritynode

[jakub]

I go with the 17 witness cap bytemaster recommended

I don't think bytemaster ever recommended to have 17 witnesses. He threw that number as acceptable after seeing how few people are participating in the testing phase. It was damage control - at least that's my understanding of the situation.

I think he did. He once opened a thread and said:

In my opinion we should aim for around 17 witnesses rather than 101

https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,18549.0.html

[triox]

I go with the 17 witness cap bytemaster recommended

I don't think bytemaster ever recommended to have 17 witnesses. He threw that number as acceptable after seeing how few people are participating in the testing phase. It was damage control - at least that's my understanding of the situation.

[rnglab]

Hi fav, I've just set you as my voting proxy.

changed my witness account from "bitshares-argentina" to "rnglab", "1.6.45"

Still need to get voted back since yesterday's fork, my nodes crashed while out of town with  no internet coverage.

added you to waiting list, I'm currently voting for 17 witnesses, which is my cap

Thank you fav

[fav]

Hi fav, I've just set you as my voting proxy.

changed my witness account from "bitshares-argentina" to "rnglab", "1.6.45"

Still need to get voted back since yesterday's fork, my nodes crashed while out of town with  no internet coverage.

added you to waiting list, I'm currently voting for 17 witnesses, which is my cap