0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: fav on October 15, 2015, 06:52:03 amFYI, I will vote for this proposal https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,19055.0.htmlJust saw your activity in the explorer of the web wallet. So cool being able to watch it like that.
FYI, I will vote for this proposal https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,19055.0.html
add me fav please: betaxtradeChanged proxy to you now.
Quote from: betax on October 14, 2015, 01:02:38 pmadd me fav please: betaxtradeChanged proxy to you now.voted. Witnesses are now 17 / 17 - every new witness means an old one will be deleted. I go with the 17 witness cap bytemaster recommended
Thanks fav. Looks like riverhead got fired though
Hi fav, I've just set you as my voting proxy.changed my witness account from "bitshares-argentina" to "rnglab", "1.6.45"Still need to get voted back since yesterday's fork, my nodes crashed while out of town with no internet coverage.
Quote from: rnglab on October 15, 2015, 02:07:27 pmHi fav, I've just set you as my voting proxy.changed my witness account from "bitshares-argentina" to "rnglab", "1.6.45"Still need to get voted back since yesterday's fork, my nodes crashed while out of town with no internet coverage.added you to waiting list, I'm currently voting for 17 witnesses, which is my cap
I go with the 17 witness cap bytemaster recommended
Quote from: fav on October 15, 2015, 08:37:39 am I go with the 17 witness cap bytemaster recommendedI don't think bytemaster ever recommended to have 17 witnesses. He threw that number as acceptable after seeing how few people are participating in the testing phase. It was damage control - at least that's my understanding of the situation.
In my opinion we should aim for around 17 witnesses rather than 101
Update:commmittee mindphlux unnvoted, proposal went throughalso, I decided to vote in rnglab and datasecuritynode, currently 19/17 voted in. I will try to slim down to 17 over time / filter out bad performers