What do we know?
- Controversy sells
- Coinjournal has a crypto donation QR on the website
- Controversy increases website traffic
- Website traffic converts to donations
I state each of those items individually as stand alone items. The relationship between them I have no comment about because I don't know.
It's a shame that it's so easy to forget the deep connection that we all have.
Aren't we all lovers of crypto?
Aren't we all drawn to it for the same reason?
Don't we all have similar beliefs about freedom and liberty?
So it's a shame that there's friction within the community when there's enough competition and resistance from the existing world of finance.
Let's each individually hold up the mirror for Coinjournal.
As you read Ian's article, periodically check it against the sites founding principles thus:

Is the writing objective and unbiased?
I'm just asking questions, isn't that how you get to the truth?
Isn't that what journalists are supposedly really after?