Author Topic: Proxy: jakub - better execution / implementation / communication of BM's ideas  (Read 16532 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

jakub

  • Guest
I'm supporting worker proposal 1.14.9 "Bitshares UI Project Coordinator" as described here:
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,20144.0.html

(1) wmbutler has a proved track record (he is asking for a salary AFTER proving his value when working for free)
(2) his actions are appreciated by the devs:
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,20144.msg259073.html#msg259073
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,20144.msg259365.html#msg259365
(3) this role is very much needed
« Last Edit: November 23, 2015, 09:39:05 am by jakub »

jakub

  • Guest
I am also supporting this worker proposal by CNX:
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,20089.0.html

As BM says: "This is a micro proposal for a small change to the BitShares network to lower fees in the event an order is not filled."

jakub

  • Guest
I'll be supporting this committee proposal:
http://cryptofresh.com/p/1.10.15
as described in this thread:
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,20073.0.html

In the long run my goal will be to keep the transfer fees in the range of $0.15-$0.20 as IMO this is needed for the referral program to work.
However in the short term perspective I think it's better to have this compromise and thus alleviate the split we are having in the community.

Offline fav

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4278
  • No Pain, No Gain
    • View Profile
    • Follow Me!
  • BitShares: fav
I've removed my support for 2 committee members: bitcrab and clayop as they support a significant reduction of transfer fees.
IMO this will completely undermine the referral program.

 +5%

looks like they're outvoted. this proposal http://cryptofresh.com/p/1.10.13 can't pass

jakub

  • Guest
I've removed my support for 2 committee members: bitcrab and clayop as they support a significant reduction of transfer fees.
IMO this will completely undermine the referral program.

Offline liondani

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3737
  • Inch by inch, play by play
    • View Profile
    • My detailed info
  • BitShares: liondani
  • GitHub: liondani
OP: Are you still active? Will you vote for committee members?
Still active.
I've just updated my votes to include committee members and workers as they've become visible in the GUI.
I've also added my support for 2 more witnesses: liondani & maqifrnswa.

thank you very much!   :)

jakub

  • Guest
Here is my standing regarding the recent worker proposal from CNX:

#1 It was a disaster, it's good that it's been retracted.

#2 Generally yes but I can't say I understand it fully. Hope to hear more details from BM.

#3 It's nice but low priority for me. I think we have many more important things on our plate than this, e.g. bringing all BTS functionality to the GUI level.

#4 Excellent, especially the standardized API for trading bots.

#5 Excellent, definitely needed for the BTS gateways to have such tools integrated into the GUI.

Offline pc

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1530
    • View Profile
    • Bitcoin - Perspektive oder Risiko?
  • BitShares: cyrano
Bitcoin - Perspektive oder Risiko? ISBN 978-3-8442-6568-2 http://bitcoin.quisquis.de

jakub

  • Guest
I've just added my support for 2 more witnesses:
- cyrano (as I've learned that @pc is behind it - a valuable BTS developer)
- b33lz38v8 (as I've learned that http://os.merkabahnk.io/ is behind it - a valuable BTS partner)
« Last Edit: November 04, 2015, 12:01:09 pm by jakub »

jakub

  • Guest
OP: Are you still active? Will you vote for committee members?
Still active.
I've just updated my votes to include committee members and workers as they've become visible in the GUI.
I've also added my support for 2 more witnesses: liondani & maqifrnswa.

Offline abit

  • Committee member
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 4664
    • View Profile
    • Abit's Hive Blog
  • BitShares: abit
  • GitHub: abitmore
OP: Are you still active? Will you vote for committee members?
BitShares committee member: abit
BitShares witness: in.abit

Offline CalabiYau

As an early investor in "people & ideas" I agree with your profound analysis in many ways. It is not self-evident that we have come so far and I am grateful. There was no other project since 2011 that convinced me enough to invest resources. The "smart guys" have delivered such an impressing product and I support every effort to make it successful.

Voting for this proxy.   +5%

Offline puppies

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1659
    • View Profile
  • BitShares: puppies
Thanks for the support jakub. 

Also mr.agsexplorer is forum handle boombastic.
https://metaexchange.info | Bitcoin<->Altcoin exchange | Instant | Safe | Low spreads

jakub

  • Guest
UPDATE:
(1) Cancelling my support for riverhead as has resigned:
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,18959.msg248121.html#msg248121

(2) Intending to support mindphlux worker proposal (as soon as it becomes visible in the GUI):
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,19317.0.html

Offline twitter

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 279
    • View Profile
good move  +5% +5% +5%

Following BM's appeal for establishing a foundation of proxies, I'd like to offer my service as a proxy for BTS voting.
I believe I'm in a good position for this role as I follow the forum quite closely and I've been participating in almost every mumble session this year.


The background

I've been aware of BitShares almost since the initial concept came into existence and was immediately in love with the idea. I have enormous admiration for BM's talent
witness: