Author Topic: Cryptofresh Block Explorer + MUSE now available  (Read 98706 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline abit

  • Committee member
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 4651
    • View Profile
    • Abit's Hive Blog
  • BitShares: abit
  • GitHub: abitmore
« Last Edit: March 18, 2016, 09:29:54 pm by abit »
BitShares committee member: abit
BitShares witness: in.abit

Offline roadscape

http://cryptofresh.com  |  witness: roadscape

Offline roadscape

Why don't you add more languageļ¼Ÿ

I'd be glad to, I would need a few days to work out technical hurdles (namely, serving multiple languages via web socket will require adding session/state complexity.. but it also opens options for other useful features).

Chinese is a high priority language to add. Who might be able to help with translations?
http://cryptofresh.com  |  witness: roadscape

Offline abit

  • Committee member
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 4651
    • View Profile
    • Abit's Hive Blog
  • BitShares: abit
  • GitHub: abitmore
@roadscape IMO worker list in https://cryptofresh.com/ballots need to be updated more frequently

Currently it's updated every hour, that should be frequent enough right? What you might have noticed is that some workers don't show up until they get votes from one of the top ~25 voters/proxies. So if a votable object has no downvotes or upvotes, it will end up not showing at all. This was done to save computation time and minimize lookups, but does fail to paint the whole picture. I was thinking when negative votes are moved (next hardfork?) would be a good time to update & tune up this page.
Yes that's what I mean. New worker is shown on workers page but not shown on voting reports page.
Good to know you've already thought of that. :)
BitShares committee member: abit
BitShares witness: in.abit

Offline wuyanren

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 589
    • View Profile
Why don't you add more languageļ¼Ÿ

Offline roadscape

@roadscape IMO worker list in https://cryptofresh.com/ballots need to be updated more frequently

Currently it's updated every hour, that should be frequent enough right? What you might have noticed is that some workers don't show up until they get votes from one of the top ~25 voters/proxies. So if a votable object has no downvotes or upvotes, it will end up not showing at all. This was done to save computation time and minimize lookups, but does fail to paint the whole picture. I was thinking when negative votes are moved (next hardfork?) would be a good time to update & tune up this page.
http://cryptofresh.com  |  witness: roadscape

Offline xeroc

  • Board Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12922
  • ChainSquad GmbH
    • View Profile
    • ChainSquad GmbH
  • BitShares: xeroc
  • GitHub: xeroc

Offline abit

  • Committee member
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 4651
    • View Profile
    • Abit's Hive Blog
  • BitShares: abit
  • GitHub: abitmore
BitShares committee member: abit
BitShares witness: in.abit

Offline tonyk

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3308
    • View Profile
But I'm not sure what you mean by leftmost-rightmost.. is this close? https://cryptofresh.com/a/USD
yep. exactly what I meant.
Lack of arbitrage is the problem, isn't it. And this 'should' solves it.

Offline roadscape

Like it!  +5%

Great 8)

Do you guys think it's worth keeping account names on the bids/asks? I think it's nice to see who is providing liquidity.. as long as its not in the way..
http://cryptofresh.com  |  witness: roadscape

Offline roadscape

New asset pages!
https://cryptofresh.com/a/USD
https://cryptofresh.com/a/MKR_OPEN.BTC

Feedback is appreciated, especially from a trader's perspective.. Any units to flip? Any obvious missing data?

+ 1; + 1; + 1; + 1; + 1; + 1;
wow you a such a great dev...what was this ( not wise) movie business sidestep ::)

PS
I really hate giving this kind of suggestions (as they are personal preference more than anything else), but move the price to the leftmost(rightmost) column.

Thanks @tonyk.. everything starts from nothing ;D

But I'm not sure what you mean by leftmost-rightmost.. is this close? https://cryptofresh.com/a/USD
http://cryptofresh.com  |  witness: roadscape

Offline abit

  • Committee member
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 4651
    • View Profile
    • Abit's Hive Blog
  • BitShares: abit
  • GitHub: abitmore
New asset pages!
https://cryptofresh.com/a/USD
https://cryptofresh.com/a/MKR_OPEN.BTC

Feedback is appreciated, especially from a trader's perspective.. Any units to flip? Any obvious missing data?
Like it!  +5%
BitShares committee member: abit
BitShares witness: in.abit

Offline tonyk

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3308
    • View Profile
New asset pages!
https://cryptofresh.com/a/USD
https://cryptofresh.com/a/MKR_OPEN.BTC

Feedback is appreciated, especially from a trader's perspective.. Any units to flip? Any obvious missing data?

+ 1; + 1; + 1; + 1; + 1; + 1;
wow you a such a great dev...what was this ( not wise) movie business sidestep ::)

PS
I really hate giving this kind of suggestions (as they are personal preference more than anything else), but move the price to the leftmost(rightmost) column.
« Last Edit: March 10, 2016, 11:34:17 pm by tonyk »
Lack of arbitrage is the problem, isn't it. And this 'should' solves it.

Offline roadscape

New asset pages!
https://cryptofresh.com/a/USD
https://cryptofresh.com/a/MKR_OPEN.BTC

Feedback is appreciated, especially from a trader's perspective.. Any units to flip? Any obvious missing data?
http://cryptofresh.com  |  witness: roadscape

Offline roadscape

Redesigned page: https://cryptofresh.com/assets -- The motivation for this is to (1) show the most interesting assets first, (2) to be able to check on DEX health at a glance, and (3) to encourage volume competition. I'll add a % change column soon and maybe graphs later on.

Nice, it is really cool now! Could you add the total volume on top? Top right corner of the table for example?

edit: how do you calculate for example OBITS volume? For example, in the OBITS/BTS pair, how do you decide where the volume goes to? BTS or OBITS? Or do some pairs repeat the volume? I mean, BTS trades against all of those pairs.

Done! https://cryptofresh.com/assets

To calculate total OBITS volume, I sum up OBITS volume across all markets it's traded in. To calculate BTS volume, I sum up all BTS that has moved in any of its markets. So perhaps the total 24hr volume needs to be divided by 2? (Since each half of the pair gets full credit.)

Yes I was thinking you would be counting volume twice. Maybe you need to divide it like you said?

Assume I buy 100000 bts with 0.3 BTC, shouldn't the volume be only either 100k bts OR 0.3 btc? Or both? 100k bts AND 0.3 btc were moved so I guess you don't need to divide it? I'm confused now

By cmc standars i guess you should divide it because they mention the market pairs. Obviously in our case it's impossible to show them because they are a lot. http://coinmarketcap.com/exchanges/bitshares-asset-exchange/

I guess I'll leave it as-is unless someone provides a compelling case otherwise. IMO, the way it is now makes the most sense.. and looks better :)
http://cryptofresh.com  |  witness: roadscape