« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Randomized forced settlement?  (Read 1228 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

November 30, 2015, 06:18:47 pm Reply #3

Offline tonyk

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3308
    • View Profile
Re: Randomized forced settlement?
Quote from: xeroc on November 30, 2015, 12:14:57 pm
Don't get what you are asking...
settlement time is 24h after request ..
collateral ratio is not weighted .. the settlement closes those positions that have LEAST collateral .. independent of the the actual "value"

If you examine the history -  bitCNY is a good example for the most force settlements - you will see  settlements closing positions other than the least collateralized - i.e. usually it is the least collateralized but from time to time it is some other of the 5 least collateralized positions.
Logged
Lack of arbitrage is the problem, isn't it. And this 'should' solves it.
November 30, 2015, 12:14:57 pm Reply #2

Offline xeroc

  • Board Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12922
  • ChainSquad GmbH
    • View Profile
    • ChainSquad GmbH
  • BitShares: xeroc
  • GitHub: xeroc
Re: Randomized forced settlement?
Don't get what you are asking...
settlement time is 24h after request ..
collateral ratio is not weighted .. the settlement closes those positions that have LEAST collateral .. independent of the the actual "value"
Logged
November 29, 2015, 09:27:32 pm Reply #1

Offline tonyk

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3308
    • View Profile
Randomized forced settlement?
Randomized force settlement...probably with weights for the  collateralization level?

Is that how is it supposed to work?
Logged
Lack of arbitrage is the problem, isn't it. And this 'should' solves it.
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
 

Page created in 0.217 seconds with 26 queries.