Author Topic: Proxy: xeroc  (Read 10476 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline xeroc

  • Board Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12564
  • ChainSquad GmbH
    • View Profile
    • ChainSquad GmbH
  • BitShares: xeroc
  • GitHub: xeroc
Proxy: xeroc
« on: December 28, 2015, 07:30:12 am »
Hey friends and shareholders,

since it happened to me to be a proxy, I would like to keep you informed about proxy decisions in this thread.

For those that have net set me as their proxy and are wondering why I vote for my own worker proposal:
7 Days ago I have contacted all shareholders that have me set as their proxy and sent them the following
message (hosted at github.com/xeroc/worker-proposal):

Quote
Dear Shareholder,

you receive this message because you have set the account "xeroc" as your voting
proxy in BitShares.

First, of all, I would like to thank you for the confidence and trust you have
in me.

However, I see the need to inform you about the decision I made to vote for my
own worker proposal going forward. You can find the details of it in
[github](https://github.com/xeroc/worker-proposals). In summary, the current
proposal would pay me roughly 3000€ for 20h/week of work during January and
February. After that time, a new proposal will be made with similar pay (Euro
denominated) to keep my BitShares related work funded. It is of great importance
to me to let you know about this conflicting interests!

To give you enough time to reconsider and change your voting proxy, I will *not*
vote for my proposal until Monday next week (28th of December).

Sincerely Yours
 -- Fabian Schuh a.k.a. xeroc

---
This message has been signed with PGP. The cryptographic signature can be found
in this git repository and you can verify it with `gpg --verify followers.md.sig`.

Today is 28th of December and as such, I will set my vote accordingly.
If you have me set as your proxy and do NOT agree with this you can still remove me as your proxy because my
vote will only be counted by the end of the day (maintenance interval).
Give BitShares a try! Use the http://testnet.bitshares.eu provided by http://bitshares.eu powered by ChainSquad GmbH

Offline roadscape

Re: Proxy: xeroc
« Reply #1 on: December 31, 2015, 12:52:14 am »
Good move.. very responsible! +5%
http://cryptofresh.com  |  witness: roadscape

Online abit

  • Committee member
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3182
    • View Profile
    • Steemit Blog
  • BitShares: abit
  • GitHub: abitmore
Re: Proxy: xeroc
« Reply #2 on: January 09, 2016, 04:16:10 pm »
Please consider voting against this proposal since it's wrong:
1.14.8   Bitshares UI Project Manager
BTS account: abit
BTS committee member: abit
BTS witness: in.abit

Offline xeroc

  • Board Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12564
  • ChainSquad GmbH
    • View Profile
    • ChainSquad GmbH
  • BitShares: xeroc
  • GitHub: xeroc
Re: Proxy: xeroc
« Reply #3 on: February 05, 2016, 08:19:01 am »
I have changed my votes for committee members to show support for those that actively participate in the fee schedule discussion behind the scenes.
That said, I am quite disappointed by those that I voted down that they have not voiced their opinion neither via telegram, nor via forum, or github.

Furthermore, since [member=4465]alt[/member] seems to be quite aggressive when it comes to paying for workers, I am now rejecting refund/burn workers to so that we can keep the development going.

[member=4465]alt[/member], keep in mind that your current vote for my worker will result in me having to get a regular job which will certainly take 40h+/week.
With that, I will not be able to contribute to BitShares as I do now (if at all).
« Last Edit: February 07, 2016, 08:40:00 am by xeroc »
Give BitShares a try! Use the http://testnet.bitshares.eu provided by http://bitshares.eu powered by ChainSquad GmbH

Online abit

  • Committee member
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3182
    • View Profile
    • Steemit Blog
  • BitShares: abit
  • GitHub: abitmore
Re: Proxy: xeroc
« Reply #4 on: February 10, 2016, 05:55:11 pm »
I have changed my votes for committee members to show support for those that actively participate in the fee schedule discussion behind the scenes.
That said, I am quite disappointed by those that I voted down that they have not voiced their opinion neither via telegram, nor via forum, or github.

Furthermore, since [member=4465]alt[/member] seems to be quite aggressive when it comes to paying for workers, I am now rejecting refund/burn workers to so that we can keep the development going.

[member=4465]alt[/member], keep in mind that your current vote for my worker will result in me having to get a regular job which will certainly take 40h+/week.
With that, I will not be able to contribute to BitShares as I do now (if at all).
[member=120]xeroc[/member] Please vote for the refund or burn workers.

IT'S DANGEROUS NOW.

By now, the refund worker which got highest votes is refund400k (113,325,926 BTS), which means any whale or group of whales or group of proxies who have more than 113K voting power is able to vote in a worker and steal funds from the reserve pool IMMEDIATELY. There is a flaw in the worker system, see https://github.com/cryptonomex/graphene/issues/565. We(proxies and stake holders) can't all keep watching the worker list 24 hours.
BTS account: abit
BTS committee member: abit
BTS witness: in.abit

Offline btswolf

Re: Proxy: xeroc
« Reply #5 on: March 12, 2016, 08:36:21 am »
Would you create an proposal to create an Ethereum Smartcoin?
Actually I would like to see all Top10 cryptos based on volume as Smartcoins on the DEX.
We need to position the DEX as a real alternative.

Offline xeroc

  • Board Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12564
  • ChainSquad GmbH
    • View Profile
    • ChainSquad GmbH
  • BitShares: xeroc
  • GitHub: xeroc
Re: Proxy: xeroc
« Reply #6 on: March 14, 2016, 07:18:26 am »
Would you create an proposal to create an Ethereum Smartcoin?
Actually I would like to see all Top10 cryptos based on volume as Smartcoins on the DEX.
We need to position the DEX as a real alternative.
I don't think we have the liquidity to create AND trade ETH smartcoins in BTS just yet ..
Give BitShares a try! Use the http://testnet.bitshares.eu provided by http://bitshares.eu powered by ChainSquad GmbH

Online abit

  • Committee member
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3182
    • View Profile
    • Steemit Blog
  • BitShares: abit
  • GitHub: abitmore
Re: Proxy: xeroc
« Reply #7 on: March 14, 2016, 09:16:00 am »
Would you create an proposal to create an Ethereum Smartcoin?
Actually I would like to see all Top10 cryptos based on volume as Smartcoins on the DEX.
We need to position the DEX as a real alternative.
I don't think we have the liquidity to create AND trade ETH smartcoins in BTS just yet ..
I do think an ETH sidechain is the best approach. Before that, we already have exchange issued IOUs.
BTS account: abit
BTS committee member: abit
BTS witness: in.abit

Offline hcf27

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 116
    • View Profile
  • BitShares: hcf27
Re: Proxy: xeroc
« Reply #8 on: March 19, 2016, 01:06:13 pm »
Hello @xeroc .. I think we should vote to refund @jonnybitcoin $2.8k for the social media accounts... these channels should then be handed over to the committe.

Online abit

  • Committee member
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3182
    • View Profile
    • Steemit Blog
  • BitShares: abit
  • GitHub: abitmore
Re: Proxy: xeroc
« Reply #9 on: March 19, 2016, 03:20:02 pm »
Hello [member=120]xeroc[/member] .. I think we should vote to refund [member=37127]JonnyBitcoin[/member] $2.8k for the social media accounts... these channels should then be handed over to the committe.
[member=41649]hcf27[/member] Proxies can vote if there is a worker created.
BTS account: abit
BTS committee member: abit
BTS witness: in.abit

Offline hcf27

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 116
    • View Profile
  • BitShares: hcf27
Re: Proxy: xeroc
« Reply #10 on: March 19, 2016, 04:06:38 pm »
Hello [member=120]xeroc[/member] .. I think we should vote to refund [member=37127]JonnyBitcoin[/member] $2.8k for the social media accounts... these channels should then be handed over to the committe.
[member=41649]hcf27[/member] Proxies can vote if there is a worker created.
Yes, worker will be created soon on this issue

Offline xeroc

  • Board Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12564
  • ChainSquad GmbH
    • View Profile
    • ChainSquad GmbH
  • BitShares: xeroc
  • GitHub: xeroc
Re: Proxy: xeroc
« Reply #11 on: April 29, 2016, 06:57:50 am »
Update:

 - Approved the bitARS worker since they seem to work hard to get an ARS smartcoin and only ask for the asset creation fee. It would have been slightly better if they used a multisignature account, but I trust elmato
Give BitShares a try! Use the http://testnet.bitshares.eu provided by http://bitshares.eu powered by ChainSquad GmbH

Offline cube

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1404
  • Bit by bit, we will get there!
    • View Profile
  • BitShares: bitcube
Re: Proxy: xeroc
« Reply #12 on: April 29, 2016, 09:02:12 am »
Update:

 - Approved the bitARS worker since they seem to work hard to get an ARS smartcoin and only ask for the asset creation fee. It would have been slightly better if they used a multisignature account, but I trust elmato

I urge against doing so.  It is not a matter of trust but a matter of doing it right.  IMHO, this has to be done right and the account should _at least_ be a multisig one with a number of independent and respected community members holding the keys.
« Last Edit: April 29, 2016, 09:04:44 am by cube »
ID: bitcube
bitcube is a dedicated witness and committe member. Please vote for bitcube.

Online abit

  • Committee member
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3182
    • View Profile
    • Steemit Blog
  • BitShares: abit
  • GitHub: abitmore
Re: Proxy: xeroc
« Reply #13 on: April 29, 2016, 11:50:28 am »
Update:

 - Approved the bitARS worker since they seem to work hard to get an ARS smartcoin and only ask for the asset creation fee. It would have been slightly better if they used a multisignature account, but I trust elmato

I urge against doing so.  It is not a matter of trust but a matter of doing it right.  IMHO, this has to be done right and the account should _at least_ be a multisig one with a number of independent and respected community members holding the keys.
Agreed.
BTS account: abit
BTS committee member: abit
BTS witness: in.abit

Offline xeroc

  • Board Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12564
  • ChainSquad GmbH
    • View Profile
    • ChainSquad GmbH
  • BitShares: xeroc
  • GitHub: xeroc
Re: Proxy: xeroc
« Reply #14 on: April 29, 2016, 12:06:58 pm »
Update:

 - Approved the bitARS worker since they seem to work hard to get an ARS smartcoin and only ask for the asset creation fee. It would have been slightly better if they used a multisignature account, but I trust elmato

I urge against doing so.  It is not a matter of trust but a matter of doing it right.  IMHO, this has to be done right and the account should _at least_ be a multisig one with a number of independent and respected community members holding the keys.
Agreed.

[member=7312]ElMato[/member]: To fix this, we could ask you to add the committee-account as a secondary account to your active AND owner key of the `elmato` account. Give your own keys and committee-account a weight of 1 and set a threshold of two .. After payout (e.g. the creation of the asset), the committee can then approve its own removal from your account permissions.
It has another advantage, namely, the whole committee can review the creation of the smartcoin and identify issuers prior to its creation.

Would that work for you? It seems you could get more approval if you do it that way.
Give BitShares a try! Use the http://testnet.bitshares.eu provided by http://bitshares.eu powered by ChainSquad GmbH

Offline hcf27

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 116
    • View Profile
  • BitShares: hcf27
Re: Proxy: xeroc
« Reply #15 on: April 29, 2016, 12:14:12 pm »
Update:

 - Approved the bitARS worker since they seem to work hard to get an ARS smartcoin and only ask for the asset creation fee. It would have been slightly better if they used a multisignature account, but I trust elmato

I urge against doing so.  It is not a matter of trust but a matter of doing it right.  IMHO, this has to be done right and the account should _at least_ be a multisig one with a number of independent and respected community members holding the keys.
Agreed.

[member=7312]ElMato[/member]: To fix this, we could ask you to add the committee-account as a secondary account to your active AND owner key of the `elmato` account. Give your own keys and committee-account a weight of 1 and set a threshold of two .. After payout (e.g. the creation of the asset), the committee can then approve its own removal from your account permissions.
It has another advantage, namely, the whole committee can review the creation of the smartcoin and identify issuers prior to its creation.

Would that work for you? It seems you could get more approval if you do it that way.

We knew there was a trust issue involved if we created the worker, this is why we wanted the Committe to create it for us.

It does seem logical to have created the worker from a multisig account, however this was not brought forward (at least to me) and therefore we delegated [member=7312]ElMato[/member] to do the task since we thought he was the oldest and best known member of our team (he also runs an active witness node).

Having said this, I don´t think there will be a problem in giving committe-account permissions until the asset is created and transferred, I will speak with the team and with [member=7312]ElMato[/member] to get this done as soon as possible.
« Last Edit: April 29, 2016, 12:20:43 pm by hcf27 »

Offline ElMato

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 287
    • View Profile
Re: Proxy: xeroc
« Reply #16 on: April 29, 2016, 07:53:22 pm »
Update:

 - Approved the bitARS worker since they seem to work hard to get an ARS smartcoin and only ask for the asset creation fee. It would have been slightly better if they used a multisignature account, but I trust elmato

I urge against doing so.  It is not a matter of trust but a matter of doing it right.  IMHO, this has to be done right and the account should _at least_ be a multisig one with a number of independent and respected community members holding the keys.
Agreed.

[member=7312]ElMato[/member]: To fix this, we could ask you to add the committee-account as a secondary account to your active AND owner key of the `elmato` account. Give your own keys and committee-account a weight of 1 and set a threshold of two .. After payout (e.g. the creation of the asset), the committee can then approve its own removal from your account permissions.
It has another advantage, namely, the whole committee can review the creation of the smartcoin and identify issuers prior to its creation.

Would that work for you? It seems you could get more approval if you do it that way.

We knew there was a trust issue involved if we created the worker, this is why we wanted the Committe to create it for us.

It does seem logical to have created the worker from a multisig account, however this was not brought forward (at least to me) and therefore we delegated [member=7312]ElMato[/member] to do the task since we thought he was the oldest and best known member of our team (he also runs an active witness node).

Having said this, I don´t think there will be a problem in giving committe-account permissions until the asset is created and transferred, I will speak with the team and with [member=7312]ElMato[/member] to get this done as soon as possible.

[member=120]xeroc[/member], done.
elmato account now has:

committee-account added to owner authority, threshold 2.
committee-account added to active authority, threshold 1 (for some reason the change didn't go through, so there is a proposed transaction to change the threshold for the committee to approve)
http://cryptofresh.com/tx/38d1fecba84685ea9938668b37909753a9177567


Online abit

  • Committee member
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3182
    • View Profile
    • Steemit Blog
  • BitShares: abit
  • GitHub: abitmore
Re: Proxy: xeroc
« Reply #17 on: April 30, 2016, 10:23:48 pm »
Update:

 - Approved the bitARS worker since they seem to work hard to get an ARS smartcoin and only ask for the asset creation fee. It would have been slightly better if they used a multisignature account, but I trust elmato

I urge against doing so.  It is not a matter of trust but a matter of doing it right.  IMHO, this has to be done right and the account should _at least_ be a multisig one with a number of independent and respected community members holding the keys.
Agreed.

[member=7312]ElMato[/member]: To fix this, we could ask you to add the committee-account as a secondary account to your active AND owner key of the `elmato` account. Give your own keys and committee-account a weight of 1 and set a threshold of two .. After payout (e.g. the creation of the asset), the committee can then approve its own removal from your account permissions.
It has another advantage, namely, the whole committee can review the creation of the smartcoin and identify issuers prior to its creation.

Would that work for you? It seems you could get more approval if you do it that way.
Better use another account. `elmato` is an active witness, adding committee-account to the permission list will cause trouble in case when need to change signing key or something.
BTS account: abit
BTS committee member: abit
BTS witness: in.abit

Offline xeroc

  • Board Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12564
  • ChainSquad GmbH
    • View Profile
    • ChainSquad GmbH
  • BitShares: xeroc
  • GitHub: xeroc
Re: Proxy: xeroc
« Reply #18 on: May 11, 2016, 07:06:26 am »
out of the current committee, two have never joined any discussion or tried to contact the rest of the committee.
If you can come up with good proposals for committee member, I would love to support some fresh air in the committee.
In the meantime I will keep my voting for people that are at least active in discussions.

Hence: If you feel fit for a committee position and would like to participate in decision finding, please create a committee proposal and let me know
Give BitShares a try! Use the http://testnet.bitshares.eu provided by http://bitshares.eu powered by ChainSquad GmbH

Offline bitsharesbrazil

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 243
    • View Profile
Re: Proxy: xeroc
« Reply #19 on: May 19, 2016, 05:30:56 am »
Xeroc you are really needed in this.community...as Iam new here.....can you explain to me with this proposal to pay you where the funds come from?

I really think you are very important to this project n deserv to be rewarded n we cant stop
bitcointalk ANN https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1084460.0
chat, post, promote it!!!!!!!! Stan help to improve OP!

Offline xeroc

  • Board Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12564
  • ChainSquad GmbH
    • View Profile
    • ChainSquad GmbH
  • BitShares: xeroc
  • GitHub: xeroc
Re: Proxy: xeroc
« Reply #20 on: May 19, 2016, 06:27:42 am »
Xeroc you are really needed in this.community...as Iam new here.....can you explain to me with this proposal to pay you where the funds come from?

I really think you are very important to this project n deserv to be rewarded n we cant stop
Thanks. I am still part of this community and still put a lot of time into improving the BitShares ecosystem.

Anyway, this thread is for me being a "proxy", which doesn't pay me anything. The proxy account is called "xeroc" and is only used to delegate voting power to me.
The worker (called "pay.xeroc") is probably what you mean. It is payed by BitShares' reserves (http://cryptofresh.com/reserve). It is essentially identical to non-mines bitcoins. Just that the shareholders decide who gets how many.
Give BitShares a try! Use the http://testnet.bitshares.eu provided by http://bitshares.eu powered by ChainSquad GmbH

Offline bitsharesbrazil

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 243
    • View Profile
Re: Proxy: xeroc
« Reply #21 on: May 19, 2016, 09:54:52 pm »
I dont know how to see if bts is a profitable company....probably not but if people start using it will........
Is it unrealistic to ask like 1000 for maintenance, support, etc.... N work on improvment, features, like stealth have a target, goal, dates, budgets.....
I dont think is fair you work for free.....maybe there is a midterm btween love belief n food on the table
bitcointalk ANN https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1084460.0
chat, post, promote it!!!!!!!! Stan help to improve OP!

Offline xeroc

  • Board Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12564
  • ChainSquad GmbH
    • View Profile
    • ChainSquad GmbH
  • BitShares: xeroc
  • GitHub: xeroc
Re: Proxy: xeroc
« Reply #22 on: May 22, 2016, 04:15:46 pm »
Quick update: since [member=38926]Chris4210[/member] (which I met personally in Amsterdam) stood up to become a committee member, I replaced mindphlux in my approval list by Chris' committee account.
Further, since I see the need for high quality UN-BRANDED informational video material, I approved [member=22994]Chronos[/member] worker proposal.
Give BitShares a try! Use the http://testnet.bitshares.eu provided by http://bitshares.eu powered by ChainSquad GmbH

Offline Chris4210

  • Global Moderator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 416
  • Running for BitShares Committee Member
    • View Profile
    • www.payger.com
  • BitShares: chris4210
Re: Proxy: xeroc
« Reply #23 on: May 22, 2016, 05:49:53 pm »
Quick update: since [member=38926]Chris4210[/member] (which I met personally in Amsterdam) stood up to become a committee member, I replaced mindphlux in my approval list by Chris' committee account.
Further, since I see the need for high quality UN-BRANDED informational video material, I approved [member=22994]Chronos[/member] worker proposal.

thank you Xeroc for your support!
Vote Chris4210 for Committee Member http://bit.ly/1WKC03B! | www.Payger.com - Payments + Messenger | www.BitShareshub.io - Community based fanpage for the BitShares Blockchain

Offline xeroc

  • Board Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12564
  • ChainSquad GmbH
    • View Profile
    • ChainSquad GmbH
  • BitShares: xeroc
  • GitHub: xeroc
Re: Proxy: xeroc
« Reply #24 on: May 27, 2016, 09:06:44 am »
I have decided to NOT approve the bitCNY-settlement worker for these reasons:

- On many places, we have advertised a settlement at 100% the price feed, not 99%
- We do not know if an offset will improve the peg (though we won't know until we try - we can try with a new asset like TCNY though)
- IMHO shorters shouldn't make a profit from settlement as their position doesn't change
- shorters instead DO make a profit from selling borrowed bitassets into the market at a premium
- settlement should be considered a rare operation and instead of asking for a "variable fee" (settlement offset), settlements could be discouraged by an increased flat fee on settlement (fess go to BTS shareholders)

Please note: Even if I disapprove the worker, I do have to follow the shareholders' vote on the worker. If the worker finds/keeps sufficient approval until its expiration, I will still need to approve the committee-proposal!
« Last Edit: May 27, 2016, 01:24:02 pm by xeroc »
Give BitShares a try! Use the http://testnet.bitshares.eu provided by http://bitshares.eu powered by ChainSquad GmbH

Online pc

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1365
    • View Profile
    • Bitcoin - Perspektive oder Risiko?
  • BitShares: cyrano
Re: Proxy: xeroc
« Reply #25 on: May 27, 2016, 09:35:58 am »
I have decided to NOT approve the bitCNY-settlement worker for these reasons:

Thanks!


Please note: Even if I disapprove the worker, I do have to follow the shareholders' vote on the worker. If the worker finds/keeps sufficient approval until its expiration, I will still need to approve the committee-proposal!

Huh? Since when has a worker proposal been binding for committee members?

I'd thought in our governance model committee members form their own opinion and vote accordingly on committee proposals. Shareholders vote indirectly on proposals by voting on committee members who support their own opinion.

Edit: please keep in mind that the worker proposal would be rejected if you were voting for the refund worker. Your voting for the refund worker would of course have the side effect of pushing other worker proposals out. Which proves that the results for worker voting are not meaningful for making policy decisions.
« Last Edit: May 27, 2016, 09:47:49 am by pc »
Please vote for my BitShares witness "cyrano" and for my STEEM witness "cyrano.witness"!
Bitcoin - Perspektive oder Risiko? ISBN 978-3-8442-6568-2 http://bitcoin.quisquis.de

Offline xeroc

  • Board Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12564
  • ChainSquad GmbH
    • View Profile
    • ChainSquad GmbH
  • BitShares: xeroc
  • GitHub: xeroc
Re: Proxy: xeroc
« Reply #26 on: May 27, 2016, 01:25:02 pm »
Edit: please keep in mind that the worker proposal would be rejected if you were voting for the refund worker. Your voting for the refund worker would of course have the side effect of pushing other worker proposals out. Which proves that the results for worker voting are not meaningful for making policy decisions.

I created a "no changes to CNY settlement" worker to collect votes that are against the proposal:  "1.14.40"

That way, I don't need to approve the burn/refund worker
Give BitShares a try! Use the http://testnet.bitshares.eu provided by http://bitshares.eu powered by ChainSquad GmbH

Offline xeroc

  • Board Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12564
  • ChainSquad GmbH
    • View Profile
    • ChainSquad GmbH
  • BitShares: xeroc
  • GitHub: xeroc
Re: Proxy: xeroc
« Reply #27 on: June 01, 2016, 07:39:59 am »
Since I currently can't find the required time to upgrade the docs and to also reduce the dilution slightly, I have decided to vote down my own "documentation/support" worker.
Give BitShares a try! Use the http://testnet.bitshares.eu provided by http://bitshares.eu powered by ChainSquad GmbH

Online pc

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1365
    • View Profile
    • Bitcoin - Perspektive oder Risiko?
  • BitShares: cyrano
Re: Proxy: xeroc
« Reply #28 on: June 01, 2016, 04:33:52 pm »
+1

Glad to see that Integrity still has a meaning!
Please vote for my BitShares witness "cyrano" and for my STEEM witness "cyrano.witness"!
Bitcoin - Perspektive oder Risiko? ISBN 978-3-8442-6568-2 http://bitcoin.quisquis.de

Offline xeroc

  • Board Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12564
  • ChainSquad GmbH
    • View Profile
    • ChainSquad GmbH
  • BitShares: xeroc
  • GitHub: xeroc
Re: Proxy: xeroc
« Reply #29 on: June 06, 2016, 11:43:06 am »
Update: I have added my support to [member=11456]svk[/member]'s new worker. He has done a tremendous work with the GUI already and I am looking forward to see many more great improvements!
Give BitShares a try! Use the http://testnet.bitshares.eu provided by http://bitshares.eu powered by ChainSquad GmbH

Online pc

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1365
    • View Profile
    • Bitcoin - Perspektive oder Risiko?
  • BitShares: cyrano
Re: Proxy: xeroc
« Reply #30 on: June 13, 2016, 07:00:42 pm »
I have decided to NOT approve the bitCNY-settlement worker for these reasons:

Since this is your proxy thread not your committee thread - will you unvote those committee members currently voting for the proposal?

If I read the numbers correctly your indirect vote for the proposal as a proxy currently has much higher weight than your committee vote alone would have.
Please vote for my BitShares witness "cyrano" and for my STEEM witness "cyrano.witness"!
Bitcoin - Perspektive oder Risiko? ISBN 978-3-8442-6568-2 http://bitcoin.quisquis.de

Offline xeroc

  • Board Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12564
  • ChainSquad GmbH
    • View Profile
    • ChainSquad GmbH
  • BitShares: xeroc
  • GitHub: xeroc
Re: Proxy: xeroc
« Reply #31 on: June 14, 2016, 06:04:01 am »
There are a few reasons to not un-approve those committee members that support bitcrab's proposal:

* Lack of alternatives: There simply are not many people around that want to be a committee member just now and I don't want to have people in the committee that don't even participate in the forums or slack
* Dictatorship: With the 150M voting power my proxy currently has, I need to be more careful about what I do. This is still a decentralized decision finding process and I have cast my voted already to not support the proposal. That does not imply that I do not support the committee members.

Your post makes me think about whether it makes sense to step down as a committee member as it leaves me at a conflict of interest (as you can see)

Anyway, thanks for being so direct!
Give BitShares a try! Use the http://testnet.bitshares.eu provided by http://bitshares.eu powered by ChainSquad GmbH

Offline Chronos

Re: Proxy: xeroc
« Reply #32 on: June 14, 2016, 10:12:49 pm »
The reason you have so much support [member=120]xeroc[/member] is because you're too honest! Your proxy power is awfully overwhelming, yet I don't fear for the network. Thanks for your hard work to support Bitshares.

By the way:
* Lack of alternatives: There simply are not many people around that want to be a committee member
I'm happy to act as committee member if everyone thinks that would be helpful. As you can see, I meet the first qualification: active on the forums. :)

Offline bitsharesbrazil

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 243
    • View Profile
Re: Proxy: xeroc
« Reply #33 on: June 15, 2016, 12:00:37 am »
well done xeroc, n well balanced, thats why people support you....you are not my proxy but I feel confidence in your role. congratulations!
bitcointalk ANN https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1084460.0
chat, post, promote it!!!!!!!! Stan help to improve OP!

Offline cube

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1404
  • Bit by bit, we will get there!
    • View Profile
  • BitShares: bitcube
Re: Proxy: xeroc
« Reply #34 on: June 15, 2016, 04:06:40 am »
There are a few reasons to not un-approve those committee members that support bitcrab's proposal:

* Lack of alternatives: There simply are not many people around that want to be a committee member just now and I don't want to have people in the committee that don't even participate in the forums or slack
* Dictatorship: With the 150M voting power my proxy currently has, I need to be more careful about what I do. This is still a decentralized decision finding process and I have cast my voted already to not support the proposal. That does not imply that I do not support the committee members.

Your post makes me think about whether it makes sense to step down as a committee member as it leaves me at a conflict of interest (as you can see)

Anyway, thanks for being so direct!

You are one of the most active committee members and have a deep passion to see bitshares succeed.  Please stay that way and not be distracted by the other thought.
ID: bitcube
bitcube is a dedicated witness and committe member. Please vote for bitcube.

Online pc

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1365
    • View Profile
    • Bitcoin - Perspektive oder Risiko?
  • BitShares: cyrano
Re: Proxy: xeroc
« Reply #35 on: June 15, 2016, 03:26:31 pm »
There are a few reasons to not un-approve those committee members that support bitcrab's proposal:

* Dictatorship: With the 150M voting power my proxy currently has, I need to be more careful about what I do. This is still a decentralized decision finding process and I have cast my voted already to not support the proposal. That does not imply that I do not support the committee members.

I understand your dilemma, although I disagree on your conclusion. But it's your decision, of course.

Your post makes me think about whether it makes sense to step down as a committee member as it leaves me at a conflict of interest (as you can see)

Please don't. You're probably *the* most important community member right now. We need you in the committee.
If you can't resolve that conflict of interest, stop being a proxy. :-)
Please vote for my BitShares witness "cyrano" and for my STEEM witness "cyrano.witness"!
Bitcoin - Perspektive oder Risiko? ISBN 978-3-8442-6568-2 http://bitcoin.quisquis.de

Offline xeroc

  • Board Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12564
  • ChainSquad GmbH
    • View Profile
    • ChainSquad GmbH
  • BitShares: xeroc
  • GitHub: xeroc
Re: Proxy: xeroc
« Reply #36 on: June 15, 2016, 03:43:08 pm »
If you can't resolve that conflict of interest, stop being a proxy. :-)
In fact I never asked to be a proxy .. I merely opened up this thread because people set me as their proxy and I though I should at least properly document my decisions.

Anyhow, if the voting power of my proxy continues to rise I will sooner or later need to ask people to not use me as proxy any longer. My soft limit would be when I can replace the last 3 witnesses. The hard limit would be 30% of the witnesses .. let's hope we don't get there, but if we do, there are other means to prevent centralization ..
Give BitShares a try! Use the http://testnet.bitshares.eu provided by http://bitshares.eu powered by ChainSquad GmbH

Offline xeroc

  • Board Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12564
  • ChainSquad GmbH
    • View Profile
    • ChainSquad GmbH
  • BitShares: xeroc
  • GitHub: xeroc
Re: Proxy: xeroc
« Reply #37 on: July 18, 2016, 10:35:07 am »
update

 - I have approved the bts-munich web-reward worker (https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,22828.0/all.html)
   They deserve some initial funding to continue their efforts. There has already been done some work towards a refreshed webpage.

 - added nexus-dev witness
   Trusted Ethereum company with many tech enthusiasts from the BitShares space working with them. I believe [member=487]Riverhead[/member] runs this witness for them.

 - readded bitcrab to the committee
   .. since he appears to be more active in the community again.
Give BitShares a try! Use the http://testnet.bitshares.eu provided by http://bitshares.eu powered by ChainSquad GmbH

Online pc

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1365
    • View Profile
    • Bitcoin - Perspektive oder Risiko?
  • BitShares: cyrano
Re: Proxy: xeroc
« Reply #38 on: July 18, 2016, 12:01:18 pm »

 - added nexus-dev witness
   Trusted Ethereum company with many tech enthusiasts from the BitShares space working with them. I believe [member=487]Riverhead[/member] runs this witness for them.


IMO in the interest of decentralization you shouldn't be voting for both riverhead and nexus-dev, if both are run by the same person.
Please vote for my BitShares witness "cyrano" and for my STEEM witness "cyrano.witness"!
Bitcoin - Perspektive oder Risiko? ISBN 978-3-8442-6568-2 http://bitcoin.quisquis.de

Offline Riverhead

Re: Proxy: xeroc
« Reply #39 on: July 19, 2016, 11:52:25 am »

 - added nexus-dev witness
   Trusted Ethereum company with many tech enthusiasts from the BitShares space working with them. I believe [member=487]Riverhead[/member] runs this witness for them.


IMO in the interest of decentralization you shouldn't be voting for both riverhead and nexus-dev, if both are run by the same person.


A valid point for consideration to anyone that sets Xeroc as their proxy. They have leveraged my experience running a Steem witness to bootstrap their witness candidate. They are in the process of procuring hardware and I'll be handing it off at that point. I'll update this thread when that happens.

Offline callmeluc

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 539
    • View Profile
Re: Proxy: xeroc
« Reply #40 on: October 06, 2016, 10:09:11 am »
Is there any chance our witness "witness.still“ can get your support?

Our proposal is here:
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,23336.0.html
BTS_自扯自淡

Offline peccavi1

Re: Proxy: xeroc
« Reply #41 on: December 22, 2016, 07:18:19 pm »
Hey xeroc
have just given you proxy voting on my account
think you have the right approach though this is a lot of swahili to me
Trusting in your integrity!
Wishing you a fair wind!
peccavi1

Hey friends and shareholders,

since it happened to me to be a proxy, I would like to keep you informed about proxy decisions in this thread.

For those that have net set me as their proxy and are wondering why I vote for my own worker proposal:
7 Days ago I have contacted all shareholders that have me set as their proxy and sent them the following
message (hosted at github.com/xeroc/worker-proposal):

Quote
Dear Shareholder,

you receive this message because you have set the account "xeroc" as your voting
proxy in BitShares.

First, of all, I would like to thank you for the confidence and trust you have
in me.

However, I see the need to inform you about the decision I made to vote for my
own worker proposal going forward. You can find the details of it in
[github](https://github.com/xeroc/worker-proposals). In summary, the current
proposal would pay me roughly 3000€ for 20h/week of work during January and
February. After that time, a new proposal will be made with similar pay (Euro
denominated) to keep my BitShares related work funded. It is of great importance
to me to let you know about this conflicting interests!

To give you enough time to reconsider and change your voting proxy, I will *not*
vote for my proposal until Monday next week (28th of December).

Sincerely Yours
 -- Fabian Schuh a.k.a. xeroc

---
This message has been signed with PGP. The cryptographic signature can be found
in this git repository and you can verify it with `gpg --verify followers.md.sig`.

Today is 28th of December and as such, I will set my vote accordingly.
If you have me set as your proxy and do NOT agree with this you can still remove me as your proxy because my
vote will only be counted by the end of the day (maintenance interval).

Offline xeroc

  • Board Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12564
  • ChainSquad GmbH
    • View Profile
    • ChainSquad GmbH
  • BitShares: xeroc
  • GitHub: xeroc
Re: Proxy: xeroc
« Reply #42 on: December 25, 2016, 03:59:51 pm »
Thanks for your trust.
Indeed there is a lot of technology, politics and business involved in running a huge network like bitshares and i expect it to grow massively in 2017.
Hoping to serve your needs well..
Give BitShares a try! Use the http://testnet.bitshares.eu provided by http://bitshares.eu powered by ChainSquad GmbH

Offline xeroc

  • Board Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12564
  • ChainSquad GmbH
    • View Profile
    • ChainSquad GmbH
  • BitShares: xeroc
  • GitHub: xeroc
Re: Proxy: xeroc
« Reply #43 on: January 03, 2017, 10:47:44 am »
To let you know, I have

* approved svk's worker as I know he is doing awesome work and the UI needs to improve constantly to keep an edge over competitors
* disapproved soledger's worker as I haven't heard or seen anything for a couple of weeks
Give BitShares a try! Use the http://testnet.bitshares.eu provided by http://bitshares.eu powered by ChainSquad GmbH

Offline xiangxn

Re: Proxy: xeroc
« Reply #44 on: January 16, 2017, 03:36:03 am »
You can vote for my witness [xn-delegate], thanks.
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,23687.0.html
Please vote for my witness: xn-delegate
My wallet:https://btsgo.net/

Offline CalabiYau

Re: Proxy: xeroc
« Reply #45 on: January 16, 2017, 09:00:09 am »
Thanks for your trust.
Indeed there is a lot of technology, politics and business involved in running a huge network like bitshares and i expect it to grow massively in 2017.
Hoping to serve your needs well..

Really appreciate your job & integrity and share your expectations !

Offline xeroc

  • Board Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12564
  • ChainSquad GmbH
    • View Profile
    • ChainSquad GmbH
  • BitShares: xeroc
  • GitHub: xeroc
Re: Proxy: xeroc
« Reply #46 on: January 16, 2017, 09:49:43 am »
Even though I dislike approving an unknown developer as a worker for BitShares core code, I am willing to see and give Alfredo Garcia a chance to proof himself.
I'll revisit my choice in a few weeks
Give BitShares a try! Use the http://testnet.bitshares.eu provided by http://bitshares.eu powered by ChainSquad GmbH

Offline fav

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4220
  • No Pain, No Gain
    • View Profile
  • BitShares: fav
Re: Proxy: xeroc
« Reply #47 on: January 16, 2017, 10:08:52 am »
Even though I dislike approving an unknown developer as a worker for BitShares core code, I am willing to see and give Alfredo Garcia a chance to proof himself.
I'll revisit my choice in a few weeks

blockpay is supervising and paying for half of the worker... I think that's a good enough incentive to give him a chance :)
► How-to Buy BitShares: https://goo.gl/i9j2YZ

Offline Thom

Re: Proxy: xeroc
« Reply #48 on: January 19, 2017, 04:51:21 pm »
Even though I dislike approving an unknown developer as a worker for BitShares core code, I am willing to see and give Alfredo Garcia a chance to proof himself.
I'll revisit my choice in a few weeks

blockpay is supervising and paying for half of the worker... I think that's a good enough incentive to give him a chance :)

I agree with both of these comments.

Thank you xeroc for continuing to be involved and for your optimistic attitude towards the platform. You sir are a powerhouse!

Also glad to see Riverhead's involvement as nexus-dev. Riverhead is yet another solid and long standing member of this community I am very happy to see return in any capacity.
Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere - MLK |  Verbaltech2 Witness Reports: https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,23902.0.html

Offline Stan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2871
  • You need to think BIGGER, Pinky...
    • View Profile
    • Cryptonomex
  • BitShares: Stan
Re: Proxy: xeroc
« Reply #49 on: January 20, 2017, 03:28:21 am »
Even though I dislike approving an unknown developer as a worker for BitShares core code, I am willing to see and give Alfredo Garcia a chance to proof himself.
I'll revisit my choice in a few weeks

blockpay is supervising and paying for half of the worker... I think that's a good enough incentive to give him a chance :)

I agree with both of these comments.

Thank you xeroc for continuing to be involved and for your optimistic attitude towards the platform. You sir are a powerhouse!

Also glad to see Riverhead's involvement as nexus-dev. Riverhead is yet another solid and long standing member of this community I am very happy to see return in any capacity.

Agreed.  Xeroc is the bees knees.


Anything said on these forums does not constitute an intent to create a legal obligation or contract of any kind.   These are merely my opinions which I reserve the right to change at any time.

Offline xeroc

  • Board Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12564
  • ChainSquad GmbH
    • View Profile
    • ChainSquad GmbH
  • BitShares: xeroc
  • GitHub: xeroc
Re: Proxy: xeroc
« Reply #50 on: February 03, 2017, 10:42:45 am »
I just voted against the worker that proposes to increase the payment for witnesses.
In my opinion, the witnesses job is producing blocks and providing a reliable feed. The "problems" raised with "inaccurate" feeds have mostly been resolved. witnesses that still produce inaccurate feeds should be replaced by those that are willing to work for the current pay.
If things go wild, I would rather move feed production away from witnesses towards a set of paid (through workers) producers which however comes with other disadvantages.
Give BitShares a try! Use the http://testnet.bitshares.eu provided by http://bitshares.eu powered by ChainSquad GmbH

Offline Thom

Re: Proxy: xeroc
« Reply #51 on: February 03, 2017, 04:18:41 pm »
I just voted against the worker that proposes to increase the payment for witnesses.
In my opinion, the witnesses job is producing blocks and providing a reliable feed. The "problems" raised with "inaccurate" feeds have mostly been resolved. witnesses that still produce inaccurate feeds should be replaced by those that are willing to work for the current pay.
If things go wild, I would rather move feed production away from witnesses towards a set of paid (through workers) producers which however comes with other disadvantages.

So I guess the feedback you were looking from witnesses as to what they will do with the increase didn't come or was unacceptable in your perspective. You just posted that request 2 days ago, which isn't a lot of time. Your impression may come from other sources that this forum, like Telegram.

I'm curious as to why you believe the feed accuracy issue has been "resolved" given the eastern perspective. I've been reading this forum every day for a couple of weeks now but that isn't my impression.

I'm open to new info. Perhaps I missed an important input, for example on Telegram which I can't keep up with on the ...DEX channel.

If that is the case, it would be great to see a summary of such important info from Telegram that's being factored into these decisions.
« Last Edit: February 03, 2017, 04:23:20 pm by Thom »
Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere - MLK |  Verbaltech2 Witness Reports: https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,23902.0.html

Offline xeroc

  • Board Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12564
  • ChainSquad GmbH
    • View Profile
    • ChainSquad GmbH
  • BitShares: xeroc
  • GitHub: xeroc
Re: Proxy: xeroc
« Reply #52 on: February 03, 2017, 04:25:37 pm »
So I guess the feedback you were looking from witnesses as to what they will do with the increase didn't come or was unacceptable in your perspective.
I did read feedback from a couple witnesses here in the forums and on telegram but there are still plenty of witnesses I haven't even seen in months let alone reading anything from them.
If we get those voted out and can instead vote in some fresh and motivated people, then I will re-evaluate.

Quote
I'm curious as to why you believe the feed accuracy issue has been "resolved" given the eastern perspective. I've been reading this forum every day for a couple of weeks now but that isn't my impression.

I'm open to new info. Perhaps I missed an important input, for example on Telegram which I can't keep up with on the ...DEX channel.
My impression was that most witnesses updated their feed script to reflect the price according to the wishes of the chinese community (i.e. neglect western BTC trading pairs and focus on the chinese-based BTC price).
Are there still witnesses producing "massively" inaccurate price feeds?
Give BitShares a try! Use the http://testnet.bitshares.eu provided by http://bitshares.eu powered by ChainSquad GmbH

Offline BunkerChainLabs-com

Re: Proxy: xeroc
« Reply #53 on: February 04, 2017, 01:54:29 am »
So I guess the feedback you were looking from witnesses as to what they will do with the increase didn't come or was unacceptable in your perspective.
I did read feedback from a couple witnesses here in the forums and on telegram but there are still plenty of witnesses I haven't even seen in months let alone reading anything from them.
If we get those voted out and can instead vote in some fresh and motivated people, then I will re-evaluate.

Quote
I'm curious as to why you believe the feed accuracy issue has been "resolved" given the eastern perspective. I've been reading this forum every day for a couple of weeks now but that isn't my impression.

I'm open to new info. Perhaps I missed an important input, for example on Telegram which I can't keep up with on the ...DEX channel.
My impression was that most witnesses updated their feed script to reflect the price according to the wishes of the chinese community (i.e. neglect western BTC trading pairs and focus on the chinese-based BTC price).
Are there still witnesses producing "massively" inaccurate price feeds?

I wonder if this is still an issue since the China gov audited the china exchanges and found out that they were manipulating the BTC markets and so are forcing them to charge fees for trading now. It would suggest that their price is likely going to be more in line with the North American/Euro prices more so now. I guess we have to wait a bit to see.

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
www.Peerplays.com | World's First Decentralized Tournament Platform Built Entirely on the Blockchain!
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Offline xeroc

  • Board Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12564
  • ChainSquad GmbH
    • View Profile
    • ChainSquad GmbH
  • BitShares: xeroc
  • GitHub: xeroc
Re: Proxy: xeroc
« Reply #54 on: February 06, 2017, 11:34:19 am »
Dear followers,

I am going to vote for my own worker (https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,23770.0/all.html) in a few days. If you disagree with paying
this worker, please consider removing me as your proxy. Thank you for considerations.

Regards
 -- Fabian
Give BitShares a try! Use the http://testnet.bitshares.eu provided by http://bitshares.eu powered by ChainSquad GmbH

Offline Thom

Re: Proxy: xeroc
« Reply #55 on: February 06, 2017, 04:06:17 pm »
Dear followers,

I am going to vote for my own worker (https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,23770.0/all.html) in a few days. If you disagree with paying
this worker, please consider removing me as your proxy. Thank you for considerations.

Regards
 -- Fabian

I see the proposals bitcrab entered to measure stake weighted consensus for increasing witness pay are neck in neck, with "Agree" now slightly in the lead with 27% and "Against" the increase remaining at 24%. The Agree to the increase has risen 7% since yesterday.

After reviewing your worker proposal and seeing the level of pay you're requesting, I'm really surprised you're so bearish on the witness pay issue.

I NOT saying you're not well worth every cent of the $4K monthly pay you're requesting, in fact I also see a benefit to liquidity using your new worker proposal scheme. PLUS I think BitShares will GREATLY benefit from the resulting work on the uptick interface.

Since you are my proxy my formal support is inclusive as well as "verbally" explicit here. I would hope that you will reconsider your position on witness pay. What is the process for that? I know it's up to committee, but is there a regular meeting or call for votes on changes or is it ad-hoc whenever the committee feels a formal vote / parameter change can't wait any longer?

When will an increase in witness pay be formally put to a vote by the committee?
 
« Last Edit: February 06, 2017, 04:07:53 pm by Thom »
Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere - MLK |  Verbaltech2 Witness Reports: https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,23902.0.html

Offline xeroc

  • Board Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12564
  • ChainSquad GmbH
    • View Profile
    • ChainSquad GmbH
  • BitShares: xeroc
  • GitHub: xeroc
Re: Proxy: xeroc
« Reply #56 on: February 07, 2017, 02:03:45 pm »
I just approved the 0pay worker that votes for an increase of the witness pay to 3 BTS/block
with the reservation that I will disapprove all witnesses that do not provide additional work to fund other that provide additional work to the BTS blockchain (one or the other way)

@witnesses: ball is in your court now! Please show us your passion!
Give BitShares a try! Use the http://testnet.bitshares.eu provided by http://bitshares.eu powered by ChainSquad GmbH

Offline xeroc

  • Board Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12564
  • ChainSquad GmbH
    • View Profile
    • ChainSquad GmbH
  • BitShares: xeroc
  • GitHub: xeroc
Re: Proxy: xeroc
« Reply #57 on: February 07, 2017, 02:11:33 pm »
Dear Thom,

the worker pay is as high because of it asking for 2.5x the actual pay so that bitUSD can be borrowed if not available to buy. This means the payment will by far not on full end up in my possession.
Also, I don't have any trouble with increasing witness pay and actually just now approved the 3BTS proposal of [member=23]bitcrab[/member]. The point I was trying to make is that I don't like to throw money at witnesses that
do their job now with the pay they get. If we increase pay, I do expect improvements one or the other way.
Since I realized that I can remove my support also from witnesses if they don't show their passion, I realized I can indeed support an increased payout for witnesses.

Committee has a Telegram group that is used to coordinate. A proposal needs to last a couple days at least which should give every committee member enough time to approve or comment on his disapproval.
If a committee member doesn't vote and doesn't comment, he should be voted down.

For a social perspective, is only possible if one of the vote-workers crosses the burn worker, however, I think we should eventually come up with a more granular social consensus about when a vote-worker is considered "approved" or not ..

Hope that answers your questions.

After reviewing your worker proposal and seeing the level of pay you're requesting, I'm really surprised you're so bearish on the witness pay issue.

I NOT saying you're not well worth every cent of the $4K monthly pay you're requesting, in fact I also see a benefit to liquidity using your new worker proposal scheme. PLUS I think BitShares will GREATLY benefit from the resulting work on the uptick interface.

Since you are my proxy my formal support is inclusive as well as "verbally" explicit here. I would hope that you will reconsider your position on witness pay. What is the process for that? I know it's up to committee, but is there a regular meeting or call for votes on changes or is it ad-hoc whenever the committee feels a formal vote / parameter change can't wait any longer?

When will an increase in witness pay be formally put to a vote by the committee?

Give BitShares a try! Use the http://testnet.bitshares.eu provided by http://bitshares.eu powered by ChainSquad GmbH

Offline xeroc

  • Board Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12564
  • ChainSquad GmbH
    • View Profile
    • ChainSquad GmbH
  • BitShares: xeroc
  • GitHub: xeroc
Re: Proxy: xeroc
« Reply #58 on: February 11, 2017, 05:43:38 pm »
I have approved this worker:
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,23785.0.html
While I understand this is "advertisement" and should be covered by the referral program, I also understand that the referral program is a 'long-term' play
and cannot provide liquidity for a short-term advertisement opportunity as presented here!
Give BitShares a try! Use the http://testnet.bitshares.eu provided by http://bitshares.eu powered by ChainSquad GmbH

Offline fav

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4220
  • No Pain, No Gain
    • View Profile
  • BitShares: fav
Re: Proxy: xeroc
« Reply #59 on: February 11, 2017, 06:33:42 pm »
I have approved this worker:
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,23785.0.html
While I understand this is "advertisement" and should be covered by the referral program, I also understand that the referral program is a 'long-term' play
and cannot provide liquidity for a short-term advertisement opportunity as presented here!

could you wait a bit if possible? There is NO framework to measure success or anything. Let me remind you that bitshares paid chronos $2.4 for ONE (!) youtube view at the time of measurement. let's not mindlessly throw money at something like we did in the past
► How-to Buy BitShares: https://goo.gl/i9j2YZ

Offline xeroc

  • Board Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12564
  • ChainSquad GmbH
    • View Profile
    • ChainSquad GmbH
  • BitShares: xeroc
  • GitHub: xeroc
Re: Proxy: xeroc
« Reply #60 on: February 20, 2017, 08:57:07 am »
I urge every committee member that wants to keep my vote to approve the committee proposal `1.10.1183` which increases the witness pay from 1.5BTS to 3BTS (http://cryptofresh.com/p/1.10.1183)
as it has been approved by the majority of shareholders.
Give BitShares a try! Use the http://testnet.bitshares.eu provided by http://bitshares.eu powered by ChainSquad GmbH

Offline alt

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2613
    • View Profile
  • BitShares: baozi
Re: Proxy: xeroc
« Reply #61 on: March 29, 2017, 02:07:39 pm »
at least you should make sure bue's node is online before you vote for this guy
can you vote him out before you confirm his node is up?

Offline xeroc

  • Board Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12564
  • ChainSquad GmbH
    • View Profile
    • ChainSquad GmbH
  • BitShares: xeroc
  • GitHub: xeroc
Re: Proxy: xeroc
« Reply #62 on: March 29, 2017, 02:33:46 pm »
at least you should make sure bue's node is online before you vote for this guy
can you vote him out before you confirm his node is up?
You are right, my impression was he would still be interested in being a witness and gave him another chance.
How would you propose that I check his node's availability next time? Aren't "potential" witnesses not supposed to have their machine running in case someone (like me) votes them in?
Give BitShares a try! Use the http://testnet.bitshares.eu provided by http://bitshares.eu powered by ChainSquad GmbH

Offline alt

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2613
    • View Profile
  • BitShares: baozi
Re: Proxy: xeroc
« Reply #63 on: March 29, 2017, 11:02:35 pm »
it's your job to make sure his node online if you want to vote for him.
you can touch him through mail/IM , what ever
if you think it's very emergency to vote him in, you need to watch if he's lost block after you vote him in.
6 hours have passed before I post here after you vote him in.

you are the biggest vote proxy, you need more carefully.

usually I only vote for somebody ask for vote in the forum recently.

Offline xeroc

  • Board Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12564
  • ChainSquad GmbH
    • View Profile
    • ChainSquad GmbH
  • BitShares: xeroc
  • GitHub: xeroc
Re: Proxy: xeroc
« Reply #64 on: March 30, 2017, 04:49:33 am »
you are the biggest vote proxy, you need more carefully.
Agreed

Quote
usually I only vote for somebody ask for vote in the forum recently.
That's what I usually do aswell. Didn't work out too good with the 'public-witness-one', either ..

I will work on some nicer tools to make it easier for me to track misbehaving witnesses.
Give BitShares a try! Use the http://testnet.bitshares.eu provided by http://bitshares.eu powered by ChainSquad GmbH

Offline xeroc

  • Board Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12564
  • ChainSquad GmbH
    • View Profile
    • ChainSquad GmbH
  • BitShares: xeroc
  • GitHub: xeroc
Re: Proxy: xeroc
« Reply #65 on: March 30, 2017, 10:53:01 am »
How you like this:

Give BitShares a try! Use the http://testnet.bitshares.eu provided by http://bitshares.eu powered by ChainSquad GmbH

Offline fav

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4220
  • No Pain, No Gain
    • View Profile
  • BitShares: fav
Re: Proxy: xeroc
« Reply #66 on: March 30, 2017, 11:12:34 am »
How you like this:



we need this updated regularly on a website
► How-to Buy BitShares: https://goo.gl/i9j2YZ

Offline alt

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2613
    • View Profile
  • BitShares: baozi
Re: Proxy: xeroc
« Reply #67 on: March 30, 2017, 11:54:23 am »
this is one of the reason why I against the worker.
a coder like to do something cool, but we don't need this, we need something satisfied the users.
If we need this tool, we definitely implement it in the web page instead of in the console

Offline xeroc

  • Board Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12564
  • ChainSquad GmbH
    • View Profile
    • ChainSquad GmbH
  • BitShares: xeroc
  • GitHub: xeroc
Re: Proxy: xeroc
« Reply #68 on: March 30, 2017, 12:39:03 pm »
this is one of the reason why I against the worker.
a coder like to do something cool, but we don't need this, we need something satisfied the users.
If we need this tool, we definitely implement it in the web page instead of in the console
.. and you would do that for free?

You do understand that the console tool is not the main point of my worker but a reference implementation that shows how to use the python library?!
Give BitShares a try! Use the http://testnet.bitshares.eu provided by http://bitshares.eu powered by ChainSquad GmbH

Offline JonnyBitcoin

Re: Proxy: xeroc
« Reply #69 on: April 02, 2017, 12:00:53 pm »
this is one of the reason why I against the worker.
a coder like to do something cool, but we don't need this, we need something satisfied the users.
If we need this tool, we definitely implement it in the web page instead of in the console
.. and you would do that for free?

You do understand that the console tool is not the main point of my worker but a reference implementation that shows how to use the python library?!

Alt, have you considered doing a worker proposal to further develop btsbots?
I vote for liquidity and simplicity. Make me your proxy?
BTSDEX.COM

Offline alt

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2613
    • View Profile
  • BitShares: baozi
Re: Proxy: xeroc
« Reply #70 on: April 02, 2017, 01:26:15 pm »
no, btsbots.com is a gift to community for free.
and will be maintained as an open source project for free.
I don't have much time to develop it now only because of I have a new project need release in 3 month.it's not about money.
good news is the new project used btsbots's architecture, so some code will merge to btsbots later.

this is one of the reason why I against the worker.
a coder like to do something cool, but we don't need this, we need something satisfied the users.
If we need this tool, we definitely implement it in the web page instead of in the console
.. and you would do that for free?

You do understand that the console tool is not the main point of my worker but a reference implementation that shows how to use the python library?!

Alt, have you considered doing a worker proposal to further develop btsbots?

Offline JonnyBitcoin

Re: Proxy: xeroc
« Reply #71 on: April 02, 2017, 02:08:46 pm »
no, btsbots.com is a gift to community for free.
and will be maintained as an open source project for free.
I don't have much time to develop it now only because of I have a new project need release in 3 month.it's not about money.
good news is the new project used btsbots's architecture, so some code will merge to btsbots later.

this is one of the reason why I against the worker.
a coder like to do something cool, but we don't need this, we need something satisfied the users.
If we need this tool, we definitely implement it in the web page instead of in the console
.. and you would do that for free?

You do understand that the console tool is not the main point of my worker but a reference implementation that shows how to use the python library?!

Alt, have you considered doing a worker proposal to further develop btsbots?

A big BTS related project in 3 months time sounds very promising :-) :-)
I vote for liquidity and simplicity. Make me your proxy?
BTSDEX.COM

Offline xeroc

  • Board Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12564
  • ChainSquad GmbH
    • View Profile
    • ChainSquad GmbH
  • BitShares: xeroc
  • GitHub: xeroc
Re: Proxy: xeroc
« Reply #72 on: June 30, 2017, 11:03:42 am »
I justed voted for alfredo's worker, as I've seen him do incredible throughout the last months!
Give BitShares a try! Use the http://testnet.bitshares.eu provided by http://bitshares.eu powered by ChainSquad GmbH

Offline oxarbitrage

Re: Proxy: xeroc
« Reply #73 on: July 03, 2017, 11:48:38 am »
I justed voted for alfredo's worker, as I've seen him do incredible throughout the last months!

thanks, your support as proxy and individual is very appreciated!

Online abit

  • Committee member
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3182
    • View Profile
    • Steemit Blog
  • BitShares: abit
  • GitHub: abitmore
Re: Proxy: xeroc
« Reply #74 on: October 01, 2017, 11:10:11 am »
For those who wonder why [member=120]xeroc[/member] have removed votes from quite a few witnesses, here is the reason:
seem I need to go through my witness votes and kick out some of those that aren't as active as they are supposed to be for the amount of money they get.
By reducing the number of active witnesses we also reduce the operational costs of the blockchain ... let's see when people start complaining real hard ..
BTS account: abit
BTS committee member: abit
BTS witness: in.abit

Offline Chronos

Re: Proxy: xeroc
« Reply #75 on: October 03, 2017, 08:40:04 pm »
Does that really reduce operational costs? Since block time is constant, I think that would just give more income to remaining witnesses, not reduce cost.

Not saying this is a bad thing, just pointing it out.

Offline xeroc

  • Board Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12564
  • ChainSquad GmbH
    • View Profile
    • ChainSquad GmbH
  • BitShares: xeroc
  • GitHub: xeroc
Re: Proxy: xeroc
« Reply #76 on: October 17, 2017, 05:15:40 pm »
Today, I voted for the "spokesperson" proposal as well as for the "compliance" proposal as I see them desperately needed. The people that I work with won't work for free but have the knowledge and desire to bring good to BitShares.

Secondly, i want to clarify that I removed the votes for the BSIP18 worker as well as for the Steemfest worker. The reason is that those are fully funded by now (in bitUSD) through escrow by the bitshares blockchain foundation

The accounting is all public:  http://www.bitshares.foundation/accounting

most recent books look like this: 

In 30001-bitshares.foundation .. it says that there are 23kUSD in escrow for the bsip18 worker .. and 6.666 USD in escrow for the steemfest worker
Give BitShares a try! Use the http://testnet.bitshares.eu provided by http://bitshares.eu powered by ChainSquad GmbH

Offline callmeluc

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 539
    • View Profile
BTS_自扯自淡

Offline xeroc

  • Board Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12564
  • ChainSquad GmbH
    • View Profile
    • ChainSquad GmbH
  • BitShares: xeroc
  • GitHub: xeroc
Give BitShares a try! Use the http://testnet.bitshares.eu provided by http://bitshares.eu powered by ChainSquad GmbH

Offline xeroc

  • Board Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12564
  • ChainSquad GmbH
    • View Profile
    • ChainSquad GmbH
  • BitShares: xeroc
  • GitHub: xeroc
Re: Proxy: xeroc
« Reply #79 on: November 20, 2017, 07:07:39 am »
I have approved

* 201712-infrastructure, and
* 2017-12-blockchainacademy

We desperately need the first one, and to me, the second one is a bargain considering the changes of getting into university education.
Give BitShares a try! Use the http://testnet.bitshares.eu provided by http://bitshares.eu powered by ChainSquad GmbH

Offline doyoubit

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 47
    • View Profile
Re: Proxy: xeroc
« Reply #80 on: November 20, 2017, 02:43:25 pm »
I have approved

* 201712-infrastructure, and
* 2017-12-blockchainacademy

We desperately need the first one, and to me, the second one is a bargain considering the changes of getting into university education.

Awesome!  +5% +5% +5%

Offline ivandev

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 22
    • View Profile
Re: Proxy: xeroc
« Reply #81 on: December 29, 2017, 06:10:10 pm »
Hello, dear xeroc.
We've noticed, that you have unvoted openledger-dc witness. Came here, to check the reason, as well, as checked witness chat and didn't find any explanations. During the last 1.5y our witness was one of the most stable and its support was quite responsive, so is there some serious reasons for taking voice back? At the same time 3 of bottom active witnesses are missing blocks and still active.
Thanks in advance.
« Last Edit: April 04, 2018, 07:08:01 am by ivandev »

Offline xeroc

  • Board Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12564
  • ChainSquad GmbH
    • View Profile
    • ChainSquad GmbH
  • BitShares: xeroc
  • GitHub: xeroc
Re: Proxy: xeroc
« Reply #82 on: January 02, 2018, 02:15:28 pm »
Hello, dear [member=120]xeroc[/member].
We've noticed, that you have unvoted openledger-dc witness. Came here, to check the reason, as well, as checked witness chat and didn't find any explanations. During the last 1.5y our witness was one of the most stable and its support was quite responsive, so is there some serious reasons for taking voice back? At the same time 3 of bottom active witnesses are missing blocks and still active.
Thanks in advance.
Your feeds for CNY were among those that I deemed inaccurate .. chinese community members approached me to tighten up the peg .. all I can do is disapprove workers that are farer away from the actualy price than others ...
If you fix your feeds you can get voted back.


Furthermore, I have approved the BTS liquidity worker that wants to write software for automated trading. Looking forward to see how quickly they can produce high quality code.

Also, I have removed my votes from the blockchain-acedemy worker since it is fully funded now  ..

Even though the spokesperson worker is fully funded now as well, I do not remove my votes to keep it up for representative purposes. The BBF will no longer trade those BTS into USD for that worker.
Give BitShares a try! Use the http://testnet.bitshares.eu provided by http://bitshares.eu powered by ChainSquad GmbH

Offline zhaomu

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 12
    • View Profile
Re: Proxy: xeroc
« Reply #83 on: January 03, 2018, 06:42:11 am »
Hi xeroc,
     I set up a witness node on the testnet (zhaomu-test), can you vote for me so I can start to test the price feed.
    And also, can you consider my witness proposal? https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,25678.0.html

Offline xeroc

  • Board Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12564
  • ChainSquad GmbH
    • View Profile
    • ChainSquad GmbH
  • BitShares: xeroc
  • GitHub: xeroc
Re: Proxy: xeroc
« Reply #84 on: January 30, 2018, 08:27:19 am »
FYI:
I have approve workers:

- Legal Council about BTS and No-action
- BSIP29
Give BitShares a try! Use the http://testnet.bitshares.eu provided by http://bitshares.eu powered by ChainSquad GmbH

Offline xeroc

  • Board Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12564
  • ChainSquad GmbH
    • View Profile
    • ChainSquad GmbH
  • BitShares: xeroc
  • GitHub: xeroc
Re: Proxy: xeroc
« Reply #85 on: January 31, 2018, 04:00:30 pm »
I've removed my support from committee-member `openledgerdc` since openledger started setting
a default voting proxy for its customers and breaks the long-standing social contract of no-voting
of exchanges with customer funds. This is unfortunate but OpenLedger wasn't able to present
sufficient motivations for this move and after discussion, couldn't be convinced to reconsider this
position.

This is, of course, a personal opinion, but I cannot accept businesses to set default voting behavior
for its customers.

For those wondering, the `bitshareseurope` account which is set as default_proxy account, too, does
not vote.
Give BitShares a try! Use the http://testnet.bitshares.eu provided by http://bitshares.eu powered by ChainSquad GmbH

Offline oxarbitrage

Re: Proxy: xeroc
« Reply #86 on: February 01, 2018, 11:44:13 pm »
I've removed my support from committee-member `openledgerdc` since openledger started setting
a default voting proxy for its customers and breaks the long-standing social contract of no-voting
of exchanges with customer funds. This is unfortunate but OpenLedger wasn't able to present
sufficient motivations for this move and after discussion, couldn't be convinced to reconsider this
position.

This is, of course, a personal opinion, but I cannot accept businesses to set default voting behavior
for its customers.

For those wondering, the `bitshareseurope` account which is set as default_proxy account, too, does
not vote.

This is good info for me. Not your personal opinion and decision as that is ... well, personal; but on my last worker proposal i asked Ronny if he can vote for it. Never got a response, i will take this opportunity to apologize for that, i didn't know how it was and i saw the account voting before i thought they were a new big proxy and tried to contact them as i did with all the rest.
I was also close to ask you for a vote with bitshareseurope when i realized it was yours, at the end it was not needed but i now know it will not be possible and why.

thank you for the transparency.

Offline ccedk

  • Board Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1068
  • Synergy, community work and proactively thinking
    • View Profile
    • CCEDK.com - Danish Crypto Currency Exchange BitUSD-USD Buy and Sell Digital Currency
  • BitShares: ccedkbts
Re: Proxy: xeroc
« Reply #87 on: February 08, 2018, 01:20:19 pm »
I've removed my support from committee-member `openledgerdc` since openledger started setting
a default voting proxy for its customers and breaks the long-standing social contract of no-voting
of exchanges with customer funds. This is unfortunate but OpenLedger wasn't able to present
sufficient motivations for this move and after discussion, couldn't be convinced to reconsider this
position.

This is, of course, a personal opinion, but I cannot accept businesses to set default voting behavior
for its customers.

For those wondering, the `bitshareseurope` account which is set as default_proxy account, too, does
not vote.

thanks, great to know how you consider a "company" - the de facto bitshares exchange OpenLedger, and this is not my words, but rather the creator or BitShares who said this. It has to be very clear that we are not an exchange as we have no access to manipulate the transactions on the DEX which is clearly the definition of an exchange, and until now we have offered a valuable service to all bts community where we are until now still at a minus overall for providing gateways allowing people to access a safe haven like bitshares stablecoins or bts itself or same procedure for leaving again. There is no doubt that this is not done out of pure charity, however, it is clear that we are providing a valuable support for the community to evolve and we do it with the face that allows us to constantly act for the benefit of the community.

What you decide to do personally is up to you, and you are right it is definitely personal and it is also personal when I remove my support from your own committee post, thank you for perhaps stating a discussion as to who does what and for the benefits of whom in whatever is done for bitshares, I think it could in fact become an interesting "soap opera" and I could be writing a lot more right now, but choose not to.

And lets be clear, it is only customers if they use the gateways provided by OpenLedger, and with more than 170 000 signups already, it is clear that less than 10 000 of these are in fact active, so what we are in fact providing is a support from the people not trading or even active making use of these accounts where they may have been not used and all for the benefit of bts. And the customers are in fact also the customers of the bts community as it is a service offered to the community and definitely also customers to all the OBITS holders who benefit minimum 50% of all revenues.
« Last Edit: February 08, 2018, 01:28:35 pm by ccedk »
OBITS - a token of appreciation  http://obits.io/
OpenLedger Webwallet - https://bitshares.openledger.info
ICOO Prelaunch ICO asset - http://icoo.io/

Offline xeroc

  • Board Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12564
  • ChainSquad GmbH
    • View Profile
    • ChainSquad GmbH
  • BitShares: xeroc
  • GitHub: xeroc
Re: Proxy: xeroc
« Reply #88 on: February 20, 2018, 11:10:32 am »
FYI, I have had multiple discussions with clockwork during the last couple months and respect and
trust him more than enough to approve his newly created committee membership. Looking forward
to rattle those committee members that passed away
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=25980.0
Give BitShares a try! Use the http://testnet.bitshares.eu provided by http://bitshares.eu powered by ChainSquad GmbH

Offline xeroc

  • Board Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12564
  • ChainSquad GmbH
    • View Profile
    • ChainSquad GmbH
  • BitShares: xeroc
  • GitHub: xeroc
Re: Proxy: xeroc
« Reply #89 on: March 22, 2018, 07:20:32 am »
I have voted for clockwork's worker since he proved himselve reliable on the testnet
I also intend to approve the committee proposal of xiaoshan
Give BitShares a try! Use the http://testnet.bitshares.eu provided by http://bitshares.eu powered by ChainSquad GmbH

Offline ivandev

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 22
    • View Profile
Re: Proxy: xeroc
« Reply #90 on: April 04, 2018, 07:14:28 am »
Your feeds for CNY were among those that I deemed inaccurate .. chinese community members approached me to tighten up the peg .. all I can do is disapprove workers that are farer away from the actualy price than others ...
If you fix your feeds you can get voted back.
Hello, dear Fabian. From the last time, you've checked our feeds, we made some major updates of feeds scripts, reconsidered reliable sources of prices, so we have much more objective feeds states, than previously. Could you please consider voting again for our witness?
Thanks in advance.

Offline xeroc

  • Board Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12564
  • ChainSquad GmbH
    • View Profile
    • ChainSquad GmbH
  • BitShares: xeroc
  • GitHub: xeroc
Re: Proxy: xeroc
« Reply #91 on: April 04, 2018, 07:27:06 am »

https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=26107.new#new
I will vote for the committee-funding worker so that it can receive funds.
Two weeks after it received funds, I will remove my vote for a subsequent report to convince me it is a good idea.
Give BitShares a try! Use the http://testnet.bitshares.eu provided by http://bitshares.eu powered by ChainSquad GmbH

Offline win.neil

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 13
    • View Profile
    • winex
  • BitShares: neil-hu
Re: Proxy: xeroc
« Reply #92 on: April 09, 2018, 02:50:52 pm »
Hello, xeroc:

You can vote for our witness (winex.witness), thank you very much.
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=25831.0
DEX:winex.pro
witness: winex.witness

Online Bangzi

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 94
    • View Profile
    • Steemit: Bangzi
  • BitShares: bangzi
Re: Proxy: xeroc
« Reply #93 on: May 17, 2018, 09:11:13 am »
Please consider vote for Bangzi !!!

Testnet ID: bangzi-test (Only miss 1 block since few days ago)

Bitshares' Witness Proposal:
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=26459.0
Please Vote for My Witness: Bangzi
My Blog: https://steemit.com/@bangzi
请投票支持比特股见证人: Bangzi

Offline xeroc

  • Board Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12564
  • ChainSquad GmbH
    • View Profile
    • ChainSquad GmbH
  • BitShares: xeroc
  • GitHub: xeroc
Re: Proxy: xeroc
« Reply #94 on: July 04, 2018, 02:06:55 pm »
I am approving JohnR's proposal to become committee member: https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=26758.msg319777;topicseen#new

We need to catch up compatition there and I feel that someone with background in economics is the right thing for us nerds to find a way to grow BitShares into an *actual* business.
Give BitShares a try! Use the http://testnet.bitshares.eu provided by http://bitshares.eu powered by ChainSquad GmbH

Offline xeroc

  • Board Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12564
  • ChainSquad GmbH
    • View Profile
    • ChainSquad GmbH
  • BitShares: xeroc
  • GitHub: xeroc
Re: Proxy: xeroc
« Reply #95 on: July 11, 2018, 07:47:22 am »
I support the HackTheDex worker:
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=26806.0
as well as the infrastructure worker:
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=26778.0
Give BitShares a try! Use the http://testnet.bitshares.eu provided by http://bitshares.eu powered by ChainSquad GmbH

Offline xeroc

  • Board Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12564
  • ChainSquad GmbH
    • View Profile
    • ChainSquad GmbH
  • BitShares: xeroc
  • GitHub: xeroc
Re: Proxy: xeroc
« Reply #96 on: July 12, 2018, 09:28:37 am »
Voting for Alfredo's worker to cover the promised amount of payment
Give BitShares a try! Use the http://testnet.bitshares.eu provided by http://bitshares.eu powered by ChainSquad GmbH