Author Topic: Network problem now fixed, all nodes please update  (Read 5720 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline abit

  • Committee member
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 4664
    • View Profile
    • Abit's Hive Blog
  • BitShares: abit
  • GitHub: abitmore
Would this issue have caused a fork, or just a network stall?
No fork so far.

I can confirm there was some kind of fork, because metaexchange sent transactions which never arrived.
All nodes have been restarted, all transactions in the cache are gone. If you have a backup of your transactions, try broadcast them again.

There were network splits for sure, upgraded nodes in a network, and un-upgraded nodes in the other, but no fork since the un-upgraded nodes are unable to produce blocks.
« Last Edit: January 29, 2016, 05:25:05 pm by abit »
BitShares committee member: abit
BitShares witness: in.abit

Offline monsterer

Would this issue have caused a fork, or just a network stall?
No fork so far.

I can confirm there was some kind of fork, because metaexchange sent transactions which never arrived.
My opinions do not represent those of metaexchange unless explicitly stated.
https://metaexchange.info | Bitcoin<->Altcoin exchange | Instant | Safe | Low spreads

Offline BunkerChainLabs-DataSecurityNode

Network is back in action.. still waiting for more witnesses to update.
Well done guys ..
Downtime still was in the line of bitcoins waiting time for your transaction :)

Haha.. we can call these our bitcoin moments. :)
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
www.Peerplays.com | Decentralized Gaming Built with Graphene - Now with BookiePro and Sweeps!
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Offline abit

  • Committee member
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 4664
    • View Profile
    • Abit's Hive Blog
  • BitShares: abit
  • GitHub: abitmore
Would this issue have caused a fork, or just a network stall?
No fork so far.
BitShares committee member: abit
BitShares witness: in.abit

Offline CalabiYau

Network is back in action.. still waiting for more witnesses to update.
Well done guys ..
Downtime still was in the line of bitcoins waiting time for your transaction :)

+ 100%

Offline monsterer

Would this issue have caused a fork, or just a network stall?
My opinions do not represent those of metaexchange unless explicitly stated.
https://metaexchange.info | Bitcoin<->Altcoin exchange | Instant | Safe | Low spreads

Offline rnglab

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 171
    • View Profile
  • BitShares: rnglab
>70% participation now, growing as western witnesses wakes up. The fix is working good so far.

Offline xeroc

  • Board Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12922
  • ChainSquad GmbH
    • View Profile
    • ChainSquad GmbH
  • BitShares: xeroc
  • GitHub: xeroc
Network is back in action.. still waiting for more witnesses to update.
Well done guys ..
Downtime still was in the line of bitcoins waiting time for your transaction :)

Offline fuzzy

So this means asshole1 who is trying to get the fees from the UIAs is actually helping the network by finding issues? Who would have guessed.
http://cryptofresh.com/b/3067958

Me for one... but I am weird that way... the masses (and BM included btw) think speaking positively is the only way to "help"
...well besides selling their BTS...
@fuzzy

I also like the name... #1asshole beats it but I think it is not a vary valid name in bts... 2.0.

tony...i have no clue why you continue assuming you know so much about me.  at some point lieing about people starts seeming like slander.  in fact your willingness to do this to me made me put you on ignore because to be frank im really busy trying to make our community wealthier and more able to help change a world gone to shit.  I honestly dont have time for this and the only reason I know about it this time is because apparently you so miss my responses that you felt it necessary to mention me. 

the funny thing is at first i thought you were being super cool and mentioning me in a discussion we should be having tomorrow...which would have been cool because it would have been overtly helpful.

Then i had to continue reading....LOL
WhaleShares==DKP; BitShares is our Community! 
ShareBits and WhaleShares = Love :D

Offline BunkerChainLabs-DataSecurityNode

Network is back in action.. still waiting for more witnesses to update.
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
www.Peerplays.com | Decentralized Gaming Built with Graphene - Now with BookiePro and Sweeps!
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Offline abit

  • Committee member
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 4664
    • View Profile
    • Abit's Hive Blog
  • BitShares: abit
  • GitHub: abitmore
BitShares committee member: abit
BitShares witness: in.abit

Offline BunkerChainLabs-DataSecurityNode

Fix is in.. several witnesses are building right now and should be back online shortly.
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
www.Peerplays.com | Decentralized Gaming Built with Graphene - Now with BookiePro and Sweeps!
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Offline bytemaster

I have identified the problem, fix to be pushed shortly.
For the latest updates checkout my blog: http://bytemaster.bitshares.org
Anything said on these forums does not constitute an intent to create a legal obligation or contract between myself and anyone else.   These are merely my opinions and I reserve the right to change them at any time.

Offline BunkerChainLabs-DataSecurityNode

The fee pool balance is 1 satoshi (0.00001 BTS).. might that have some significance?

Code: [Select]
get_object 2.3.781
get_object 2.3.781
[{
    "id": "2.3.781",
    "current_supply": 2000000000,
    "confidential_supply": 0,
    "accumulated_fees": 2500000,
    "fee_pool": 1
  }
]

Can the fees have a precision beyond the asset?
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
www.Peerplays.com | Decentralized Gaming Built with Graphene - Now with BookiePro and Sweeps!
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Offline abit

  • Committee member
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 4664
    • View Profile
    • Abit's Hive Blog
  • BitShares: abit
  • GitHub: abitmore
Update: I tried to generate an empty block but failed. Why still need fee?
Code: [Select]
2112038ms th_a       db_block.cpp:195              _push_block          ] Failed to push new block:                         [114/1936]
3030007 insufficient_fee: insufficient fee
Insufficient Fee Paid
    {"core_fee_paid":0,"required":10000}
    th_a  evaluator.hpp:230 evaluate

    {}
    th_a  evaluator.cpp:46 start_evaluate

    {}
    th_a  db_block.cpp:653 apply_operation

    {"next_block.block_num()":3067959}
    th_a  db_block.cpp:536 _apply_block
2112038ms th_a       witness.cpp:178               block_production_loo ] Got exception while generating block:
3030007 insufficient_fee: insufficient fee
Insufficient Fee Paid
    {"core_fee_paid":0,"required":10000}
    th_a  evaluator.hpp:230 evaluate

    {}
    th_a  evaluator.cpp:46 start_evaluate

    {}
    th_a  db_block.cpp:653 apply_operation

    {"next_block.block_num()":3067959}
    th_a  db_block.cpp:536 _apply_block

    {"new_block":{"previous":"002ed036dea60c5872751faccc904c4c04d8edc0","timestamp":"2016-01-29T00:35:12","witness":"1.6.35","transact
ion_merkle_root":"0000000000000000000000000000000000000000","extensions":[],"witness_signature":"1f2eb9e040001a6aee45bdf4dbc0845c00d91
b0418cd5eaa577643a8b72bc7f73838f904a2dc23d40dc8a36f224b5c63205200f9ade4d195baed079d9ec14375a9","transactions":[]}}
    th_a  db_block.cpp:201 _push_block

    {"witness_id":"1.6.35"}
    th_a  db_block.cpp:405 _generate_block

BitShares committee member: abit
BitShares witness: in.abit