NXT forks BitShares 2.O mojo! goes for scalability

[CoinHoarder]

Meh, I'm not done here.

The funny thing is.... you guys are "smart enough to know Litecoin was dying wayyyyy before I did," but you're not smart enough to see that Bitshares is dying. Now, THAT is funny.

@gamey Looking through your post count, you have not posted anything of substance for quite a while. Sorry that I try to critique and analyze things rather than cheerlead and groupthink with every post.

I am the one doing the groupthinking? Siding with BM nowadays is an unpopular opinion. Yet, I am the delusional one... It is cool nowadays to attack anything he proposes and says.

[gamey]

.....

Except I said it back when it was controversial... https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=662058.400

Whatever. I spend hours... daily... for 4 years researching cryptocurrencies. Then you armchair experts try to play like you're experts. You spend way too much time on these forums. You should branch out into the rest of the cryptocurrency community and see how deluded everyone is here. Thanks for the underhanded compliment douchenozzle.

 I've been intentionally arrogant in the past, but I am not so stupid to wonder why people wouldn't want to listen to me.  So is Bytemaster the only non-deluded person on this forum ?  Or would it be you and him?  Amuse me. One of your problems is you lump the 100s of users on the forum as all thinking the same way and being 'deluded'.  There are many things you say like this, which just makes people blow you off and no I don't care about any account on Bitcointalk in regards to this.

Basically, you spend too much time trying to prove to everyone you're smart.

I doubt I spend much if any more time than you do on this forum .. but continue on, you are starting to become really amusing with all these claims that have no real evidence or explanations backing them.  Your analysis skills are world class.  Just read this thread.

Anyway, I'll shut-up...  Although I do think I like being called a douchenozzle.  lol. cheers

[CoinHoarder]

.....

Except I said it back when it was controversial... https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=662058.400

2014. Such controversy. 

I was after Charlie in early 2013 ... and that was too late.

I can has autograph?

I am just pointing out I am not new around the crypto scene as Gamey had declared up-thread...

[Tuck Fheman]

.....

Except I said it back when it was controversial... https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=662058.400

2014. Such controversy. 

I was after Charlie in early 2013 ... and that was too late.

[CoinHoarder]

.....

Except I said it back when it was controversial... https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=662058.0

That's after I have been lobbying for innovative development in Litecoin for months...

Whatever. I spend hours... daily... for 4 years researching cryptocurrencies. Then you armchair experts try to play like you're experts. You spend way too much time on these forums. You should branch out into the rest of the cryptocurrency community and see how deluded everyone is here including yourself. Thanks for the underhanded compliment douchenozzle.

You are delusional if you think Bytemaster is not the best thing that ever happened to Bitshares. It simply would not exist, and would not be where it is today without him.

I am done with this poop flinging you have initiated, you may have the last word. Good day.

[Tuck Fheman]

Saying that LTC is going nowhere is not some bit of brilliance...

Chicken no Rize.

[gamey]

Coinhoarder you are as deluded as anyone and you can't even think straight. After repeating myself multiple times you finally have admitted you were greatly confused.

I'm still not sure if we are supposed to blindly follow Bytemaster because you view him as having a towering intellect or if that would be the group think which you hate so much.

This forum is all over the board about dilution and it is usually the Chinese guys who hate it. 

However, thank you for explaining why you personally care so much. 

Saying that LTC is going nowhere is not some bit of brilliance... lots around here have been saying the same. Yet they're still far ahead of every other project that didn't have a huge IPO/celebrity backing.  Seems very likely it'll die eventually. I've referred to LTC as BTC 1.2 some time ago.. I don't think I'm particularly smart for realizing that, nor would I ever brag about it, but to each his own.

[CoinHoarder]

I don't quote mortals much, but when I do:

The old adage goes.. you need to spend money to make money

I do believe it was the Chinese who proved that particular law at around the same time they were inventing paper and gunpowder, in fact, if it wasn't for that third round of funding following the failed IPO, neither would have been invented. 

I waste too much time coaching you guys though... I will probably end up giving up like I did on ...

The Litecoiners gave me a lot of hate too for consistently voicing dissenting opinions. I guess the joke is on them. (or is it on you?)

[BunkerChainLabs-DataSecurityNode]

My next project, called CoinHodor, will be a fork of NXT 2.O, BitShares 2.O, Crypti 2.O (aka Lisk) and dShares. It will be 15% better than all four, which makes it 60% better overall, by my math.

@Ander quick.. put some bitcoin into this!

[Not Vitalik Buterin]

My next project, called CoinHodor, will be a fork of NXT 2.O, BitShares 2.O, Crypti 2.O (aka Lisk) and dShares. It will be 15% better than all four, which makes it 60% better overall, by my math.

[CoinHoarder]

Seems like a misunderstanding to me. You guys are certainly idiots if you can't see how I could be confused... considering Tonyk's proposal has been the hot topic the past week and the underlying idea of Nxt 2.0 is splitting Nxt into two separate tokens. Regardless of there being different purposes for splitting Bitshares/Nxt into two separate tokens, there is an obvious similarity and the benefits may be overlapped if you combined the technologies. This is why I trust Bytemaster... he understands things like this:

can someone pull out the good ideas from that thread?

Bytemaster immediately saw the potential in the idea rather than stating "OMG Nxt is copying our completely original idea to make a scale-able blockchain." If you think this idea is original, then I have a bridge to sell you. So, I figured this couldn't be what you're talking about... silly me apparently. 

This is why I have pulled out of Bitshares. You guys have wrangled "control" of Bitshares from him by dragging his name through the mud for diluting Bitshares. Yet, fail to see he is the only thing that has put Bitshares where it is today. So many project have crashed and burned by now, but Bitshares is actually still doing OK compared to most. I trust Bytemaster's intellect, but I do not trust the rest of you. You guys (me including) can only dream of being as smart as him. I have been involved with cryptocurrencies since 2012. If I am a "noob", then what does that make all of you? https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=114059.msg1232596#msg1232596

Why do I still care? I convinced a lot of family and friends to invest in Bitshares early. I am too embarrassed/stubborn to admit I was wrong about Bitshares, but I am certainly on the verge of doing so. Too much group think, not enough critical think. "Dilution bad", "stagnated development good" ... cave man style thought process.

Research my warnings to Litecoin several years back. I ended up being right... they are a dying coin because they failed to innovate. Ethereum one-upping them is only the first step to the slow death of Litecoin. I see similar things happening with this project... with the greedy community holding innovation and development back in this fast paced ecosystem by screaming bloody murder regarding dilution. The old adage goes.. you need to spend money to make money holds true in the cryptocurrency space. You may be ahead now as far as technology and features, but you don't seem to understand it is paramount to continue development to stay ahead instead of stagnate and fall behind a la Litecoin.

I waste too much time coaching you guys though... I will probably end up giving up like I did on Litecoin. Oh well, I tried. Right? What can you do...

[tonyk]

Here's an idea, how about we focus on attacking ideas instead of each other.

That is fine and all, but that is not CoinHoarder's mission so he will never do this.  He has a relatively new account.

I am not coming to his defense, but I don't understand that statement. His account is only a couple months 'newer' than yours - he registered here 600 days ago.

Again, you lack reading comprehension. I'm not going to waste my time with an imbecile such as yourself. 

CH's (r)

PS
600 days should excuse this? Or does he needs more time? I am truly confused... honestly
...in the total pile of crap from CH..you decided to dedicate yourself on the issue that his account is not SO new??? and forget the statements like the one quoted above..and the fact he has NO stake in BTS.... but nevertheless  you center in on  the difference between account reg. dates by someone who dare state CH's BS is BS?

 wow nice!

[mint chocolate chip]

Here's an idea, how about we focus on attacking ideas instead of each other.

That is fine and all, but that is not CoinHoarder's mission so he will never do this.  He has a relatively new account.

I am not coming to his defense, but I don't understand that statement. His account is only a couple months 'newer' than yours - he registered here 600 days ago.

[gamey]

Here's an idea, how about we focus on attacking ideas instead of each other.

That is fine and all, but that is not CoinHoarder's mission so he will never do this.  He has a relatively new account. Swears up and down he has no stake in BTS.  Uses similar verbage of trolls past. I'm just pointing this out.  Even this thread, he derailed with nonsense, conflating this with TonyK's idea. You have to scratch yourself on the head and wonder why he cares so much, bringing it up in completely unrelated threads, trying to derail things etc.

NXT's idea was interesting to read and no I don't think they stole BTS's ideas, nor do I think many people in this thread believe as much.  Nor do I think everyone can't see the problems with TonyK's idea, they just don't all explicitly state it. 

Some people around here seem to realize that if you repeat nonsense enough, someone somewhere will start to believe it. That irks me.

Don't worry, I won't muck up this forum with my trolling the trolls. (much)

edit - Ok, someone pointed out I am wrong about the account's registration. I thought I remembered his account being summer 2015. It is summer 2014. My mistake.

[BunkerChainLabs-DataSecurityNode]

Here's an idea, how about we focus on attacking ideas instead of each other.

 

Fact is.. ideas are worthless, execution is everything.