I see your point, but when you advertise "OpenLedger, which is a decentralized financial platform - in fact, the de facto BitShares 2.0 platform", you are kinda taking on the responsibility of promoting everything for and about Bitshares. You can't be the "de facto Bitshares 2.0 platform" and be separate at the same time.
I never thought I was separate in fact, this is why I dont get why Openledger is not put out there more than it is. I dont have any problems promoting Bitshares as it clearly shows, but in return I am not shown the same appreciation on forum of what i am in fact supposed to be promoting, so all my work of promoting bitshares is in fact giving in some ways a negative effect as users not finding OpenLedger may think that what is mentioned in articles is not all correct and they get the wrong feeling from day 1.
I was asked from Stan once if OpenLedger is neutral and meant as a BitShares platform, and I said yes I believed it to be a Bitshare platform with the focus of giving bts the best possible conditions in future, and in order to bring the message out to the initial masses of other crypto minded people as first step to mainstream acceptance it is sometimes wise to present a neutral name like OpenLedger for easier access and quicker acceptance. Then you can always speak about BitShares once they have entered the door and felt the furniture.
The quickest way to mainstream acceptance is not a straight road, and although I do believe in cutting corners, it is all in all a lengthy process.
On top of all, the assets promoted are all allowing an increasing amount of bts to be used for the good of the network, all are part of the BTS platform therefore promoting same everytime a new user buys these assets after having signed up, well some even buy the assets before signing up, but all in all everything promoted here is promoting bitshares.
Topic: We need to make OpenLedger more visible on the forum site ASAP (Read 7808 times)
