0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Sun Mar 02 23:02:02 2014 Share acceptedSun Mar 02 23:02:11 2014 Share acceptedSun Mar 02 23:02:12 2014 Share acceptedSun Mar 02 23:02:13 2014 Share acceptedSun Mar 02 23:02:14 2014 Share acceptedSun Mar 02 23:02:14 2014 Share acceptedSun Mar 02 23:02:15 2014 Share acceptedWorker 0-0 GeForce GTX 650 Ti CPM (15m) 460.00 HPM (15m) 164.67 | CPM 458.96 HPM 164.30 | A/R 10/0 (0.00% rej)Total CPM (15m) 460.00 HPM (15m) 164.67 | CPM 458.96 HPM 164.30 | A/R 10/0 (0.00% rej)Sun Mar 02 23:02:17 2014 Share acceptedSun Mar 02 23:02:19 2014 Share acceptedSun Mar 02 23:02:23 2014 Share acceptedSun Mar 02 23:02:27 2014 Share acceptedWorker 0-0 GeForce GTX 650 Ti CPM (15m) 469.71 HPM (15m) 165.14 | CPM 468.81 HPM 164.82 | A/R 14/0 (0.00% rej)Total CPM (15m) 469.71 HPM (15m) 165.14 | CPM 468.81 HPM 164.82 | A/R 14/0 (0.00% rej)Worker 0-0 GeForce GTX 650 Ti CPM (15m) 482.00 HPM (15m) 165.50 | CPM 481.19 HPM 165.22 | A/R 14/0 (0.00% rej)Total CPM (15m) 482.00 HPM (15m) 165.50 | CPM 481.19 HPM 165.22 | A/R 14/0 (0.00% rej)Worker 0-0 GeForce GTX 650 Ti CPM (15m) 488.89 HPM (15m) 165.78 | CPM 488.15 HPM 165.53 | A/R 14/0 (0.00% rej)Total CPM (15m) 488.89 HPM (15m) 165.78 | CPM 488.15 HPM 165.53 | A/R 14/0 (0.00% rej)Sun Mar 02 23:03:01 2014 Worker 0-0 GeForce GTX 650 Ti CPM (15m) 493.60 HPM (15m) 166.00 | CPM 492.93 HPM 165.78 | A/R 14/0 (0.00% rej)Share acceptedSun Mar 02 23:03:41 2014 Total CPM (15m) 493.60 HPM (15m) 166.00 | CPM 492.93 HPM 165.78 | A/R 14/0 (0.00% rej)Share acceptedSun Mar 02 23:03:41 2014 Share acceptedSun Mar 02 23:03:41 2014 Share acceptedSun Mar 02 23:03:49 2014 Share acceptedSun Mar 02 23:03:55 2014 Share acceptedWorker 0-0 GeForce GTX 650 Ti CPM (15m) 560.00 HPM (15m) 193.09 | CPM 483.18 HPM 166.60 | A/R 20/0 (0.00% rej)Total CPM (15m) 560.00 HPM (15m) 193.09 | CPM 483.18 HPM 166.60 | A/R 20/0 (0.00% rej)Sun Mar 02 23:03:58 2014 Share acceptedSun Mar 02 23:04:03 2014 Share acceptedWorker 0-0 GeForce GTX 650 Ti CPM (15m) 558.00 HPM (15m) 191.00 | CPM 487.02 HPM 166.70 | A/R 22/0 (0.00% rej)Total CPM (15m) 558.00 HPM (15m) 191.00 | CPM 487.02 HPM 166.70 | A/R 22/0 (0.00% rej)Sun Mar 02 23:04:14 2014 Share acceptedSun Mar 02 23:04:26 2014 Share acceptedWorker 0-0 GeForce GTX 650 Ti CPM (15m) 557.54 HPM (15m) 189.54 | CPM 491.42 HPM 167.06 | A/R 24/0 (0.00% rej)Total CPM (15m) 557.54 HPM (15m) 189.54 | CPM 491.42 HPM 167.06 | A/R 24/0 (0.00% rej)Worker 0-0 GeForce GTX 650 Ti CPM (15m) 554.86 HPM (15m) 188.00 | CPM 493.24 HPM 167.12 | A/R 24/0 (0.00% rej)Total CPM (15m) 554.86 HPM (15m) 188.00 | CPM 493.24 HPM 167.12 | A/R 24/0 (0.00% rej)Sun Mar 02 23:04:44 2014 Share acceptedSun Mar 02 23:04:50 2014 Share acceptedSun Mar 02 23:04:54 2014 Share accepted
New block data - height: 57956 tx count: 28Share found! (BlockHeight: 57956)collisions/min: 428.5714 Shares total: 1Rounds per second for Nvidia GPU 0: 2.3000Share found! (BlockHeight: 57956)Share found! (BlockHeight: 57956)Share found! (BlockHeight: 57956)Share found! (BlockHeight: 57956)Share found! (BlockHeight: 57956)collisions/min: 592.0000 Shares total: 6Rounds per second for Nvidia GPU 0: 2.8000Share found! (BlockHeight: 57956)collisions/min: 532.1739 Shares total: 7Share found! (BlockHeight: 57956)Rounds per second for Nvidia GPU 0: 2.8000Share found! (BlockHeight: 57956)collisions/min: 592.2581 Shares total: 9New block data - height: 57956 tx count: 28Rounds per second for Nvidia GPU 0: 2.8000collisions/min: 566.1538 Shares total: 9collisions/min: 546.3830 Shares total: 9Rounds per second for Nvidia GPU 0: 2.8000collisions/min: 519.2727 Shares total: 9Rounds per second for Nvidia GPU 0: 2.8000collisions/min: 520.0000 Shares total: 9Rounds per second for Nvidia GPU 0: 2.8000collisions/min: 508.7324 Shares total: 9Rounds per second for Nvidia GPU 0: 2.7000Share found! (BlockHeight: 57956)collisions/min: 505.8228 Shares total: 10Share found! (BlockHeight: 57956)collisions/min: 525.5172 Shares total: 11Rounds per second for Nvidia GPU 0: 2.8000New block data - height: 57956 tx count: 28collisions/min: 538.1053 Shares total: 11Rounds per second for Nvidia GPU 0: 2.8000Share found! (BlockHeight: 57956)collisions/min: 534.7573 Shares total: 12Rounds per second for Nvidia GPU 0: 2.8000collisions/min: 540.5405 Shares total: 12Share found! (BlockHeight: 57956)Rounds per second for Nvidia GPU 0: 2.8000collisions/min: 554.6218 Shares total: 13Share found! (BlockHeight: 57956)Invalid shareReason: unknown-workcollisions/min: 553.7008 Shares total: 14Rounds per second for Nvidia GPU 0: 2.8000Share found! (BlockHeight: 57956)Invalid shareReason: unknown-workcollisions/min: 553.7778 Shares total: 15Rounds per second for Nvidia GPU 0: 2.8000collisions/min: 556.3636 Shares total: 15Share found! (BlockHeight: 57956)Invalid shareReason: unknown-workRounds per second for Nvidia GPU 0: 2.7000New block data - height: 57956 tx count: 28collisions/min: 0.0000 Shares total: 16Rounds per second for Nvidia GPU 0: 2.8000collisions/min: 648.0000 Shares total: 16Share found! (BlockHeight: 57956)Invalid shareReason: unknown-workcollisions/min: 606.6667 Shares total: 17Rounds per second for Nvidia GPU 0: 2.8000collisions/min: 572.3077 Shares total: 17Rounds per second for Nvidia GPU 0: 2.8000Share found! (BlockHeight: 57956)Invalid shareReason: unknown-workcollisions/min: 564.7059 Shares total: 18
Quote from: Brekyrself on February 25, 2014, 11:38:06 pmreorder:Any plans on a faster miner for these last few days? Some of the other miners are incredibly fast but do not work with 1gh pool.ThanksSorry, got no time at all to reimplement this.. And NaN apparently would not move host/port to commandline parameters because we do not support the hidden developer fee feature of the protocol However, I will opensource the miner tomorrow so it can possibly be used for noirshares etc.
reorder:Any plans on a faster miner for these last few days? Some of the other miners are incredibly fast but do not work with 1gh pool.Thanks
Will there be any special kind of payout before the 28th? I know the payouts occur per .1 PTS, but it would be nice if there was a one time payout before the 28th.
Quote from: reorder on February 10, 2014, 10:50:44 amQuote from: old_pioner on February 10, 2014, 10:43:07 amQuote from: reorder on February 09, 2014, 08:13:44 pmDoes it really has that fee on 1gh? Because this is the part of protocol we decided to ignore, does not feel fair.Not 1gh get fee. Look dev. readme:QuotePtsGPUz v0.4 (2014-01-28):MD5 of PtsGPUz0.4.exe: 766a4dd7a1babfff176df3855c70caf01. Supports to AMD display card added.2. Fee rate reduced to 5%.3. SM (Shader Model) 3.5 code generation added for Nvidia card like GeForce GTX 780Ti.Net performance list for AMD cards:HD7850, 1024SP, 256bit, 2GB: 470-500 collisions/minute.HD6670, 480SP, 128bit, 1GB: 100-110 collisions/minute.Yes, the point is, ypool has implemented a 'developer donation' feature in their protocol where it sends a fraction of each share reward to addresses the miner sends in special field. The problem with it is it is done silently, without warning user. So if the miner uses this feature to pay developer, his fee will not be sent by 1gh. But if it openly reconnects with another credentials to mine for developer, it will work of course.So is the PtsGPUz miner worth it from a net performance perspective? The cpm always seems higher even with 5 percent taken out vs the miner listed on the 1gh site, but maybe I'm missing something. Thanks.
Quote from: old_pioner on February 10, 2014, 10:43:07 amQuote from: reorder on February 09, 2014, 08:13:44 pmDoes it really has that fee on 1gh? Because this is the part of protocol we decided to ignore, does not feel fair.Not 1gh get fee. Look dev. readme:QuotePtsGPUz v0.4 (2014-01-28):MD5 of PtsGPUz0.4.exe: 766a4dd7a1babfff176df3855c70caf01. Supports to AMD display card added.2. Fee rate reduced to 5%.3. SM (Shader Model) 3.5 code generation added for Nvidia card like GeForce GTX 780Ti.Net performance list for AMD cards:HD7850, 1024SP, 256bit, 2GB: 470-500 collisions/minute.HD6670, 480SP, 128bit, 1GB: 100-110 collisions/minute.Yes, the point is, ypool has implemented a 'developer donation' feature in their protocol where it sends a fraction of each share reward to addresses the miner sends in special field. The problem with it is it is done silently, without warning user. So if the miner uses this feature to pay developer, his fee will not be sent by 1gh. But if it openly reconnects with another credentials to mine for developer, it will work of course.
Quote from: reorder on February 09, 2014, 08:13:44 pmDoes it really has that fee on 1gh? Because this is the part of protocol we decided to ignore, does not feel fair.Not 1gh get fee. Look dev. readme:QuotePtsGPUz v0.4 (2014-01-28):MD5 of PtsGPUz0.4.exe: 766a4dd7a1babfff176df3855c70caf01. Supports to AMD display card added.2. Fee rate reduced to 5%.3. SM (Shader Model) 3.5 code generation added for Nvidia card like GeForce GTX 780Ti.Net performance list for AMD cards:HD7850, 1024SP, 256bit, 2GB: 470-500 collisions/minute.HD6670, 480SP, 128bit, 1GB: 100-110 collisions/minute.
Does it really has that fee on 1gh? Because this is the part of protocol we decided to ignore, does not feel fair.
PtsGPUz v0.4 (2014-01-28):MD5 of PtsGPUz0.4.exe: 766a4dd7a1babfff176df3855c70caf01. Supports to AMD display card added.2. Fee rate reduced to 5%.3. SM (Shader Model) 3.5 code generation added for Nvidia card like GeForce GTX 780Ti.Net performance list for AMD cards:HD7850, 1024SP, 256bit, 2GB: 470-500 collisions/minute.HD6670, 480SP, 128bit, 1GB: 100-110 collisions/minute.
Hey guys, been awhile since I last mined PTS but gave up on all the crapcoins and pointing my miners back to PTS.Is there any Updated guides on setting up Yam miner on Ubuntu? Went through some pages of this thread but couldn't find anything.Any help would appreciated.Thank you.
Quote from: currencydebt on February 12, 2014, 03:57:54 pmIs it just short term luck or something else that has caused this 48 hour dip in blocks foundJust luck, and high variance at hashrate that low.
Is it just short term luck or something else that has caused this 48 hour dip in blocks found