Author Topic: [ANN] PTS.1GH.COM - GPU, CPU mining ★ New version 1.4! Please upgrade ASAP! ★  (Read 100445 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline mudshark79

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 76
    • View Profile
Re: [ANN] PTS.1GH.COM - GPU mining
« Reply #110 on: January 12, 2014, 01:02:12 pm »
Payday!

Offline xxrforone

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 65
    • View Profile
Re: [ANN] PTS.1GH.COM - GPU mining
« Reply #109 on: January 12, 2014, 01:01:42 pm »
We need Gpu load up to 99%  not just 65%  7950

Offline mudshark79

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 76
    • View Profile
Re: [ANN] PTS.1GH.COM - GPU mining
« Reply #108 on: January 12, 2014, 12:53:08 pm »
If the lack of luck persists hashpower will change it's mind sooner or later  8), or maybe ypool also ... gpu ...
ypоol protoshares is 6%, 1GH.COM is only 3.5%
this is important for my office botnet  8)

Right, but at the moment 96,5% of "nothing" is less than 94% of "something"., nevermind, don't wanna spoil the party.
look at http://ptsweb.beeeeer.org/blocks
they've found 5 blocks today, 3 yesterday, and 10 the day before.  It varies a lot

Right, but the nice-looking beeer-UI doesn't give a hint about the hashpower involved also - so you can't say anything about the efficiency. 1GH does a bit or at least you could calculate, as long as the top contributor list was shorter than 100, now you can make some estimations. 

Offline reorder

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 400
    • View Profile
Re: [ANN] PTS.1GH.COM - GPU mining
« Reply #107 on: January 12, 2014, 12:50:02 pm »
Btw, isn't it a "unhealthy" condition of a network, if 98% off all blocks are found by just one pool? What has this to do with "consensus" through proof-of-work? Same question is for mmc where 1gh finds nearly all the blocks... maybe a bit off topic, though. Also my understanding in this field or details is still a bit limited, normally you don't worry too much about this, don't you  8)?
It is unhealthy indeed. Somehow everyone seems to ignore ypool monopoly in PTS while 1gh takes quite a fire for being #1 in MMC.

Offline mudshark79

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 76
    • View Profile
Re: [ANN] PTS.1GH.COM - GPU mining
« Reply #106 on: January 12, 2014, 12:47:44 pm »
Btw, isn't it a "unhealthy" condition of a network, if 98% off all blocks are found by just one pool? What has this to do with "consensus" through proof-of-work? Same question is for mmc where 1gh finds nearly all the blocks... maybe a bit off topic, though. Also my understanding in this field or details is still a bit limited, normally you don't worry too much about this, don't you  8)?

Offline phrozenspite

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 58
    • View Profile
Re: [ANN] PTS.1GH.COM - GPU mining
« Reply #105 on: January 12, 2014, 12:44:51 pm »
If the lack of luck persists hashpower will change it's mind sooner or later  8), or maybe ypool also ... gpu ...
ypоol protoshares is 6%, 1GH.COM is only 3.5%
this is important for my office botnet  8)

Right, but at the moment 96,5% of "nothing" is less than 94% of "something"., nevermind, don't wanna spoil the party.
look at http://ptsweb.beeeeer.org/blocks
they've found 5 blocks today, 3 yesterday, and 10 the day before.  It varies a lot
supporting Newmine for a fair Memorycoin
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=389386.0

Offline mudshark79

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 76
    • View Profile
Re: [ANN] PTS.1GH.COM - GPU mining
« Reply #104 on: January 12, 2014, 12:42:35 pm »
If the lack of luck persists hashpower will change it's mind sooner or later  8), or maybe ypool also ... gpu ...
ypоol protoshares is 6%, 1GH.COM is only 3.5%
this is important for my office botnet  8)

Right, but at the moment 96,5% of "nothing" is less than 94% of "something"., nevermind, don't wanna spoil the party.

Offline earntodie

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 88
    • View Profile
Re: [ANN] PTS.1GH.COM - GPU mining
« Reply #103 on: January 12, 2014, 12:30:54 pm »
If the lack of luck persists hashpower will change it's mind sooner or later  8), or maybe ypool also ... gpu ...
ypоol protoshares is 6%, 1GH.COM is only 3.5%
this is important for my office botnet  8)
1GH CLUB!! PTS mining club - PTS.1GH.COM, MEMORY coin mining club - MMC.1GH.COM, MAX coin mining club - MAX.1GH.COM

Offline phrozenspite

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 58
    • View Profile
Re: [ANN] PTS.1GH.COM - GPU mining
« Reply #102 on: January 12, 2014, 12:29:37 pm »
hey reorder, the latest miner works fine only about 1% rejects now.
Is payout working for the site yet? i noticed that our first confirmed block put me above .1
supporting Newmine for a fair Memorycoin
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=389386.0

Offline reorder

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 400
    • View Profile
Re: [ANN] PTS.1GH.COM - GPU mining
« Reply #101 on: January 12, 2014, 12:28:44 pm »
Have issue:
Code: [Select]
c:\pts-1gh-win>pts-miner.exe PbFmDH5TqZViVm4TR2e4p9H4DqDYpUKdnN
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "pts-miner.py", line 5, in <module>
  File "zipextimporter.pyo", line 82, in load_module
  File "pyopencl\__init__.pyo", line 28, in <module>
  File "zipextimporter.pyo", line 98, in load_module
ImportError: MemoryLoadLibrary failed loading pyopencl\_cl.pyd
My gpu:
Code: [Select]
deviceQuery.exe Starting...

 CUDA Device Query (Runtime API) version (CUDART static linking)

Detected 1 CUDA Capable device(s)

Device 0: "GeForce GTX 650 Ti"
  CUDA Driver Version / Runtime Version          6.0 / 5.5
  CUDA Capability Major/Minor version number:    3.0
  Total amount of global memory:                 1024 MBytes (1073414144 bytes)
  ( 4) Multiprocessors, (192) CUDA Cores/MP:     768 CUDA Cores
  GPU Clock rate:                                928 MHz (0.93 GHz)
  Memory Clock rate:                             2700 Mhz
  Memory Bus Width:                              128-bit
  L2 Cache Size:                                 262144 bytes
  Maximum Texture Dimension Size (x,y,z)         1D=(65536), 2D=(65536, 65536),
3D=(4096, 4096, 4096)
  Maximum Layered 1D Texture Size, (num) layers  1D=(16384), 2048 layers
  Maximum Layered 2D Texture Size, (num) layers  2D=(16384, 16384), 2048 layers
  Total amount of constant memory:               65536 bytes
  Total amount of shared memory per block:       49152 bytes
  Total number of registers available per block: 65536
  Warp size:                                     32
  Maximum number of threads per multiprocessor:  2048
  Maximum number of threads per block:           1024
  Max dimension size of a thread block (x,y,z): (1024, 1024, 64)
  Max dimension size of a grid size    (x,y,z): (2147483647, 65535, 65535)
  Maximum memory pitch:                          2147483647 bytes
  Texture alignment:                             512 bytes
  Concurrent copy and kernel execution:          Yes with 1 copy engine(s)
  Run time limit on kernels:                     Yes
  Integrated GPU sharing Host Memory:            No
  Support host page-locked memory mapping:       Yes
  Alignment requirement for Surfaces:            Yes
  Device has ECC support:                        Disabled
  CUDA Device Driver Mode (TCC or WDDM):         WDDM (Windows Display Driver Mo
del)
  Device supports Unified Addressing (UVA):      No
  Device PCI Bus ID / PCI location ID:           2 / 0
  Compute Mode:
     < Default (multiple host threads can use ::cudaSetDevice() with device simu
ltaneously) >

deviceQuery, CUDA Driver = CUDART, CUDA Driver Version = 6.0, CUDA Runtime Versi
on = 5.5, NumDevs = 1, Device0 = GeForce GTX 650 Ti
Result = PASS
Maybe low memory? Monitor plugged in the card too/
No, it just does not work yet with Nvidia on 64bit Windows. Working on it right now.

Offline reorder

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 400
    • View Profile
Re: [ANN] PTS.1GH.COM - GPU mining
« Reply #100 on: January 12, 2014, 12:27:24 pm »
Why are we getting so many immature blocks?

Better Question: why the block rate "degraded" while Hashpower rised constantly? Laws of Propability? Seems like best working Condition was somewhen 6 hours ago...
Just luck or lack thereof.

If the lack of luck persists hashpower will change it's mind sooner or later  8), or maybe ypool also ... gpu ...
That for sure, so tell your AMD friends how cool PTS is :)

Offline mudshark79

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 76
    • View Profile
Re: [ANN] PTS.1GH.COM - GPU mining
« Reply #99 on: January 12, 2014, 12:23:46 pm »
Why are we getting so many immature blocks?

Better Question: why the block rate "degraded" while Hashpower rised constantly? Laws of Propability? Seems like best working Condition was somewhen 6 hours ago...
Just luck or lack thereof.

If the lack of luck persists hashpower will change it's mind sooner or later  8), or maybe ypool also ... gpu ...

Offline earntodie

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 88
    • View Profile
Re: [ANN] PTS.1GH.COM - GPU mining
« Reply #98 on: January 12, 2014, 12:22:44 pm »
What about CPU mining for Win and Mac?
1GH CLUB!! PTS mining club - PTS.1GH.COM, MEMORY coin mining club - MMC.1GH.COM, MAX coin mining club - MAX.1GH.COM

Offline old_pioner

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 21
    • View Profile
Re: [ANN] PTS.1GH.COM - GPU mining
« Reply #97 on: January 12, 2014, 12:15:33 pm »
Have issue:
Code: [Select]
c:\pts-1gh-win>pts-miner.exe PbFmDH5TqZViVm4TR2e4p9H4DqDYpUKdnN
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "pts-miner.py", line 5, in <module>
  File "zipextimporter.pyo", line 82, in load_module
  File "pyopencl\__init__.pyo", line 28, in <module>
  File "zipextimporter.pyo", line 98, in load_module
ImportError: MemoryLoadLibrary failed loading pyopencl\_cl.pyd
My gpu:
Code: [Select]
deviceQuery.exe Starting...

 CUDA Device Query (Runtime API) version (CUDART static linking)

Detected 1 CUDA Capable device(s)

Device 0: "GeForce GTX 650 Ti"
  CUDA Driver Version / Runtime Version          6.0 / 5.5
  CUDA Capability Major/Minor version number:    3.0
  Total amount of global memory:                 1024 MBytes (1073414144 bytes)
  ( 4) Multiprocessors, (192) CUDA Cores/MP:     768 CUDA Cores
  GPU Clock rate:                                928 MHz (0.93 GHz)
  Memory Clock rate:                             2700 Mhz
  Memory Bus Width:                              128-bit
  L2 Cache Size:                                 262144 bytes
  Maximum Texture Dimension Size (x,y,z)         1D=(65536), 2D=(65536, 65536),
3D=(4096, 4096, 4096)
  Maximum Layered 1D Texture Size, (num) layers  1D=(16384), 2048 layers
  Maximum Layered 2D Texture Size, (num) layers  2D=(16384, 16384), 2048 layers
  Total amount of constant memory:               65536 bytes
  Total amount of shared memory per block:       49152 bytes
  Total number of registers available per block: 65536
  Warp size:                                     32
  Maximum number of threads per multiprocessor:  2048
  Maximum number of threads per block:           1024
  Max dimension size of a thread block (x,y,z): (1024, 1024, 64)
  Max dimension size of a grid size    (x,y,z): (2147483647, 65535, 65535)
  Maximum memory pitch:                          2147483647 bytes
  Texture alignment:                             512 bytes
  Concurrent copy and kernel execution:          Yes with 1 copy engine(s)
  Run time limit on kernels:                     Yes
  Integrated GPU sharing Host Memory:            No
  Support host page-locked memory mapping:       Yes
  Alignment requirement for Surfaces:            Yes
  Device has ECC support:                        Disabled
  CUDA Device Driver Mode (TCC or WDDM):         WDDM (Windows Display Driver Mo
del)
  Device supports Unified Addressing (UVA):      No
  Device PCI Bus ID / PCI location ID:           2 / 0
  Compute Mode:
     < Default (multiple host threads can use ::cudaSetDevice() with device simu
ltaneously) >

deviceQuery, CUDA Driver = CUDART, CUDA Driver Version = 6.0, CUDA Runtime Versi
on = 5.5, NumDevs = 1, Device0 = GeForce GTX 650 Ti
Result = PASS
Maybe low memory? Monitor plugged in the card too/
« Last Edit: January 12, 2014, 12:19:37 pm by old_pioner »

Offline reorder

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 400
    • View Profile
Re: [ANN] PTS.1GH.COM - GPU mining
« Reply #96 on: January 12, 2014, 11:51:03 am »
Why are we getting so many immature blocks?

Better Question: why the block rate "degraded" while Hashpower rised constantly? Laws of Propability? Seems like best working Condition was somewhen 6 hours ago...
Just luck or lack thereof.