0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
I have this error message:Traceback (most recent call last): File "pts-miner.py", line 7, in <module> File "miner.py", line 1747, in miner.run (miner.c:14711) File "miner.py", line 1660, in miner.filter_devices (miner.c:13193)IndexError: list index out of range
Quote from: Condoras3 on February 16, 2014, 04:21:20 pmHow to adjust the intensity of the gpu miner? I can't use the while the miner is running.ThxEdit: initially I posted about my another miner.The PTS miner does not have anything like intensity setting, all work is done in a single thread that runs for relatively long and cannot be interrupted.
How to adjust the intensity of the gpu miner? I can't use the while the miner is running.Thx
Quote from: Condoras3 on February 16, 2014, 04:35:31 pmI have this error message:Traceback (most recent call last): File "pts-miner.py", line 7, in <module> File "miner.py", line 1747, in miner.run (miner.c:14711) File "miner.py", line 1660, in miner.filter_devices (miner.c:13193)IndexError: list index out of rangeWhat commandline do you use to start the miner?
Quote from: reorder on February 16, 2014, 04:36:25 pmQuote from: Condoras3 on February 16, 2014, 04:35:31 pmI have this error message:Traceback (most recent call last): File "pts-miner.py", line 7, in <module> File "miner.py", line 1747, in miner.run (miner.c:14711) File "miner.py", line 1660, in miner.filter_devices (miner.c:13193)IndexError: list index out of rangeWhat commandline do you use to start the miner?well the miner work, adding -I 10 throw that error
Quote from: currencydebt on February 12, 2014, 03:57:54 pmIs it just short term luck or something else that has caused this 48 hour dip in blocks foundJust luck, and high variance at hashrate that low.
Is it just short term luck or something else that has caused this 48 hour dip in blocks found
Hey guys, been awhile since I last mined PTS but gave up on all the crapcoins and pointing my miners back to PTS.Is there any Updated guides on setting up Yam miner on Ubuntu? Went through some pages of this thread but couldn't find anything.Any help would appreciated.Thank you.
Quote from: old_pioner on February 10, 2014, 10:43:07 amQuote from: reorder on February 09, 2014, 08:13:44 pmDoes it really has that fee on 1gh? Because this is the part of protocol we decided to ignore, does not feel fair.Not 1gh get fee. Look dev. readme:QuotePtsGPUz v0.4 (2014-01-28):MD5 of PtsGPUz0.4.exe: 766a4dd7a1babfff176df3855c70caf01. Supports to AMD display card added.2. Fee rate reduced to 5%.3. SM (Shader Model) 3.5 code generation added for Nvidia card like GeForce GTX 780Ti.Net performance list for AMD cards:HD7850, 1024SP, 256bit, 2GB: 470-500 collisions/minute.HD6670, 480SP, 128bit, 1GB: 100-110 collisions/minute.Yes, the point is, ypool has implemented a 'developer donation' feature in their protocol where it sends a fraction of each share reward to addresses the miner sends in special field. The problem with it is it is done silently, without warning user. So if the miner uses this feature to pay developer, his fee will not be sent by 1gh. But if it openly reconnects with another credentials to mine for developer, it will work of course.
Quote from: reorder on February 09, 2014, 08:13:44 pmDoes it really has that fee on 1gh? Because this is the part of protocol we decided to ignore, does not feel fair.Not 1gh get fee. Look dev. readme:QuotePtsGPUz v0.4 (2014-01-28):MD5 of PtsGPUz0.4.exe: 766a4dd7a1babfff176df3855c70caf01. Supports to AMD display card added.2. Fee rate reduced to 5%.3. SM (Shader Model) 3.5 code generation added for Nvidia card like GeForce GTX 780Ti.Net performance list for AMD cards:HD7850, 1024SP, 256bit, 2GB: 470-500 collisions/minute.HD6670, 480SP, 128bit, 1GB: 100-110 collisions/minute.
Does it really has that fee on 1gh? Because this is the part of protocol we decided to ignore, does not feel fair.
PtsGPUz v0.4 (2014-01-28):MD5 of PtsGPUz0.4.exe: 766a4dd7a1babfff176df3855c70caf01. Supports to AMD display card added.2. Fee rate reduced to 5%.3. SM (Shader Model) 3.5 code generation added for Nvidia card like GeForce GTX 780Ti.Net performance list for AMD cards:HD7850, 1024SP, 256bit, 2GB: 470-500 collisions/minute.HD6670, 480SP, 128bit, 1GB: 100-110 collisions/minute.
Quote from: reorder on February 10, 2014, 10:50:44 amQuote from: old_pioner on February 10, 2014, 10:43:07 amQuote from: reorder on February 09, 2014, 08:13:44 pmDoes it really has that fee on 1gh? Because this is the part of protocol we decided to ignore, does not feel fair.Not 1gh get fee. Look dev. readme:QuotePtsGPUz v0.4 (2014-01-28):MD5 of PtsGPUz0.4.exe: 766a4dd7a1babfff176df3855c70caf01. Supports to AMD display card added.2. Fee rate reduced to 5%.3. SM (Shader Model) 3.5 code generation added for Nvidia card like GeForce GTX 780Ti.Net performance list for AMD cards:HD7850, 1024SP, 256bit, 2GB: 470-500 collisions/minute.HD6670, 480SP, 128bit, 1GB: 100-110 collisions/minute.Yes, the point is, ypool has implemented a 'developer donation' feature in their protocol where it sends a fraction of each share reward to addresses the miner sends in special field. The problem with it is it is done silently, without warning user. So if the miner uses this feature to pay developer, his fee will not be sent by 1gh. But if it openly reconnects with another credentials to mine for developer, it will work of course.So is the PtsGPUz miner worth it from a net performance perspective? The cpm always seems higher even with 5 percent taken out vs the miner listed on the 1gh site, but maybe I'm missing something. Thanks.
Will there be any special kind of payout before the 28th? I know the payouts occur per .1 PTS, but it would be nice if there was a one time payout before the 28th.