[ANN] PTS.1GH.COM - GPU, CPU mining ★ New version 1.4! Please upgrade ASAP! ★

[reorder]

Hello,

I meant 275 CPM (100 HPM) . Sorry for the mistake 

The miner is algorithmically slower on 1G cards than on 1.5G+, and 5870's memory controllers are inferior to newer ones. This coin depends on fast memory access a lot.

[bustever]

Hello,

I meant 275 CPM (100 HPM) . Sorry for the mistake 

[phrozenspite]

Hello,

Thank you for you GPU miner project ! 

The hashrate is abnormally low with my 5870, i have only 275 hpm  . (I'am LTC miner and i have 440 Kh/s with this card) Win 8.1 + 13.9 drivers.

I try with the last update, but I have the same problem. Do you have an idea to enhance my hashrate ?


Thank you

what is your CPM, that's what we're using to measure this i think. 

Reorder how is the server holding up?  I recall when we started MMC that the strain started to lower people's hashrate there. 

For now though i switched back to one of the "older" versions.  5+% rejects for me is at least 55 CPM lost and the new version was maybe equal in speed, but looking a bit slower.

[voffka05]

7-10% rejects with v1.1 .i have two cards and start it not together(in one bat). 1 bat with card 0 , 2 bat with card 1 i have better results .

[bustever]

Hello,

Thank you for you GPU miner project ! 

The hashrate is abnormally low with my 5870, i have only 275 hpm  . (I'am LTC miner and i have 440 Kh/s with this card) Win 8.1 + 13.9 drivers.

I try with the last update, but I have the same problem. Do you have an idea to enhance my hashrate ?


Thank you

[phrozenspite]

still constantly at 8 here, my CPM has climbed to about 1095 now, rejects still about 5%

[mudshark79]

Does the 'queue in' (queued tasks for the card) value often fall below 8 for you with 1.1?

Constantly at 8 in 1.1

[phrozenspite]

as far as i can see it's stayed at 8.  I'll watch it for a bit to see

[reorder]

Does the 'queue in' (queued tasks for the card) value often fall below 8 for you with 1.1?

[phrozenspite]

yeah, same here.  I'm seeing it at around 1085 down from the 1100-1130 that i was fluctuating between before(it had settled around 1110). The CPM is still slowly climbing, but i'm also seeing about 5% rejects

[flakblaze]

CPM does appear to be slightly lower for me in 1.1 (using 6970s).

[mudshark79]

Sorry, guys, had to update it again (only Windows version) due to a subtle bug which prevented ntime-roll from working. Please redownload.

I am not able to change the link yet, so I cannot append version number to it for the next few hours. I have put a copy however, available at this URL: http://ptsdl.1gh.com/pts-1gh-win-1.1.zip

it could just be a coincidence but i'm getting a bunch more stale rejects now

Not a coincidence actually, the queue in the miner is deeper now, but it should be compensated by a better cpm..

CPM is not better with me. Actually, maybe 5% less, to be honest. First version was the fastest in regard of CPM, second and third are a bit less.

[reorder]

Sorry, guys, had to update it again (only Windows version) due to a subtle bug which prevented ntime-roll from working. Please redownload.

I am not able to change the link yet, so I cannot append version number to it for the next few hours. I have put a copy however, available at this URL: http://ptsdl.1gh.com/pts-1gh-win-1.1.zip

it could just be a coincidence but i'm getting a bunch more stale rejects now

Not a coincidence actually, the queue in the miner is deeper now, but it should be compensated by a better cpm..

[Aber]

Second block

[phrozenspite]

Sorry, guys, had to update it again (only Windows version) due to a subtle bug which prevented ntime-roll from working. Please redownload.

I am not able to change the link yet, so I cannot append version number to it for the next few hours. I have put a copy however, available at this URL: http://ptsdl.1gh.com/pts-1gh-win-1.1.zip

it could just be a coincidence but i'm getting a bunch more stale rejects now