Author Topic: [POLL]change force settlement parameters for all fiat pegged smartcoins?  (Read 3896 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Methodise

Very good, Bitcrab. Thanks for bringing this up. I support the proposal. Consistency across all smartcoins will make the entire platform easier to understand for newcomers.

 +5%

Agreed.  Similar bitassets should have the same rules.

But doesn't consistency across all smart coins include bitOIL, bitSILVER etc. - and all fiats treated equally.

Bitshares needs to be bitAsset agnostic.
BTS: methodise

Offline paliboy

For those who don't know, you can see these proposals using Cryptofresh, e.g. on http://cryptofresh.com/p/1.10.1727 for RUB

@bitcrab the Cryptofresh link for NOK doesn't work, any idea why?

Offline yvv

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1186
    • View Profile

Offline bitcrab

  • Committee member
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1920
    • View Profile
  • BitShares: bitcrab
  • GitHub: bitcrab
15 committee proposals created to update the forcesettlement parameters of below smartcoins:

smartcoins      proposal
EUR              1.10.1712
JPY              1.10.1714
GBP      1.10.1715
AUD      1.10.1716
CAD      1.10.1717
CHF      1.10.1718
SEK              1.10.1719
MXN      1.10.1720
NZD      1.10.1721
SGD      1.10.1722
HKD      1.10.1723
NOK      1.10.1724
KRW      1.10.1725
TRY              1.10.1726
RUB      1.10.1727

all the committee members, please approve the above 15 proposals.

memory for the steps to create such proposal:

Code: [Select]
begin_builder_transaction

return 17

add_operation_to_builder_transaction 17 [12,{"fee": {"amount":100000000, "asset_id": "1.3.0"}, "issuer": "1.2.0", "asset_to_update":"1.3.110", "new_options": { "feed_lifetime_sec": 86400,"minimum_feeds": 7,"force_settlement_delay_sec": 86400, "force_settlement_offset_percent": 100,"maximum_force_settlement_volume": 50, "short_backing_asset": "1.3.0","extensions": []}, "extensions":[]}]

propose_builder_transaction2 17 bitcrab "2017-04-27T04:00:00" 3600 true

the above 15 fiats are listed in the top20 trading volumes in FOREX, however, INR from India, BRL from Brasil, ZAR from South Africa are not created yet in Bitshares, these 3 fiats are from 3 BRICS countries and are also listed in top20.

« Last Edit: April 10, 2017, 05:14:45 am by bitcrab »
Email:bitcrab@qq.com

Offline bitcrab

  • Committee member
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1920
    • View Profile
  • BitShares: bitcrab
  • GitHub: bitcrab
I would rather vote for cleaning up flaws in basic shorting mechanics. It is beyond my understanding why do I need additional funds, besides the collateral, to close my short position. For example, if I have 1000 BTS locked in collateral, I need additional ~500 BTS to buy the borrowed asset and close the position. This is silly. Come on, people, I already have plenty of funds at my account, and I should be able to place a settle order at my price right away. If margin call happens before my order is taken, it should be canceled automatically and margin call should be executed normal way. Flaws like this create friction and hurt liquidity.

this is another topic, your suggestion sounds reasonable, however I am not sure if it is easy to realize it.
Email:bitcrab@qq.com

Offline bitcrab

  • Committee member
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1920
    • View Profile
  • BitShares: bitcrab
  • GitHub: bitcrab
Is max force settle vol =  % of 24h volume of  USD:BTS market or sum of all  USD markets?  (USD as exmple here)
Can settle orders be canceled ? ( I quess not)

if max force settle vol =a%, then in one hour a% of the smartcoin supply can be settled, settle orders cannot be cancelled.
Email:bitcrab@qq.com

Offline mea123

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 82
    • View Profile
  • BitShares: mea123
I would rather vote for cleaning up flaws in basic shorting mechanics. It is beyond my understanding why do I need additional funds, besides the collateral, to close my short position. For example, if I have 1000 BTS locked in collateral, I need additional ~500 BTS to buy the borrowed asset and close the position. This is silly. Come on, people, I already have plenty of funds at my account, and I should be able to place a settle order at my price right away. If margin call happens before my order is taken, it should be canceled automatically and margin call should be executed normal way. Flaws like this create friction and hurt liquidity.

agree

Offline yvv

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1186
    • View Profile
I would rather vote for cleaning up flaws in basic shorting mechanics. It is beyond my understanding why do I need additional funds, besides the collateral, to close my short position. For example, if I have 1000 BTS locked in collateral, I need additional ~500 BTS to buy the borrowed asset and close the position. This is silly. Come on, people, I already have plenty of funds at my account, and I should be able to place a settle order at my price right away. If margin call happens before my order is taken, it should be canceled automatically and margin call should be executed normal way. Flaws like this create friction and hurt liquidity.

Offline nmywn

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 266
    • View Profile
Is max force settle vol =  % of 24h volume of  USD:BTS market or sum of all  USD markets?  (USD as exmple here)
Can settle orders be canceled ? ( I quess not)

Offline bitcrab

  • Committee member
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1920
    • View Profile
  • BitShares: bitcrab
  • GitHub: bitcrab
more than 4 months passed, I feel now it's time to apply this planned change.

in the 4 months we can see that force settlement still happen now and then on bitUSD and bitCNY, however now shorters do not worry too much on being force settled, on the other hand, there's no big will from holders to do force settlement as it's not easy to make profit via this way. we can say that the 1% force settlement conpensation and the 0.5% limit bring the expected consequence on bitUSD and bitCNY.

in Japan, the new law defines Bitcoin and other virtual currency as a form of payment method,https://news.bitcoin.com/japan-bitcoin-method-payment-april-1/ I feel this create the possibility for more adoption of bitJPY.

it seems we have whales from Japan, the account tsuratsura-3557 hold nearly 200k bitUSD, maybe they can help to bootstrap bitJPY.

in Russia, people are also preparing an entry point to DEX. xanoxt[/member]/pre-anons-rudex-org-i-zavtrashnego-ibcg-blockchain-mitapa-v-moskve]https://steemit.com/ru/@xanoxt/pre-anons-rudex-org-i-zavtrashnego-ibcg-blockchain-mitapa-v-moskve

I feel we should not wait, we need immediately apply the changes to the fiats.

as there are little dispute on this proposal, I will not create workers to collect share based opinions, if any one still think they are necessary, please create them.

I will draft a post on github for public track and discuss of it and then begin to create the proposals.



 
Email:bitcrab@qq.com


Offline BunkerChainLabs-DataSecurityNode

This was initially what I recommended. We still have to see what impact bitUSD will have with this.. starting to collect the data on community sentiments though is good.
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
www.Peerplays.com | Decentralized Gaming Built with Graphene - Now with BookiePro and Sweeps!
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Offline Brekyrself

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 511
    • View Profile
Very good, Bitcrab. Thanks for bringing this up. I support the proposal. Consistency across all smartcoins will make the entire platform easier to understand for newcomers.

 +5%

Agreed.  Similar bitassets should have the same rules.

Offline Chronos

Very good, Bitcrab. Thanks for bringing this up. I support the proposal. Consistency across all smartcoins will make the entire platform easier to understand for newcomers.

 +5%

iHashFury

  • Guest
This may work short term for fiat.
Please do not mess with GOLD SILVER BTC!