Author Topic: [ANN] ptsweb.beeeeer.org - Protoshares mining sub-pool  (Read 230446 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Troglodactyl

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 960
    • View Profile
Re: [ANN] ptsweb.beeeeer.org - Protoshares mining sub-pool
« Reply #735 on: December 03, 2013, 06:04:27 am »
Clone from here and it will failover from beeeeer to rpool.

https://github.com/Troglodactyl/pts.git

Offline JohnD

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 76
    • View Profile
Re: [ANN] ptsweb.beeeeer.org - Protoshares mining sub-pool
« Reply #736 on: December 03, 2013, 08:14:51 am »
Clone from here and it will failover from beeeeer to rpool.

https://github.com/Troglodactyl/pts.git

Sounds good. Did you change anything else besides the auto failover?
Donate if you like it:
PTS: Pi236u2LoqHjt8xs75YdQ7ZEFGuMqVd9sJ
BTC: 1AngSrJcBxG3zBks8DnPzvTU3Q2d678XaF

Offline gnarl

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 72
    • View Profile
Re: [ANN] ptsweb.beeeeer.org - Protoshares mining sub-pool
« Reply #737 on: December 03, 2013, 08:24:20 am »
Its aliiiiive!

Offline xolokram

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 239
  • beeeeer.org
    • View Profile
Re: [ANN] ptsweb.beeeeer.org - Protoshares mining sub-pool
« Reply #738 on: December 03, 2013, 08:25:39 am »
hi,

it looks like the pool completely lost the connection to the protoshares network (necessary to create work for the miners)
starting to produce orphans and being unable to give up-to-date data :( i'm sorry about this inconvenience

i'm currently restarting/reconnecting everything and checking what caused all this

- xolokram

ps. ok, everything has been restarted, i guess some of the remaining blocks are orphans too  :-\
pps. looks like one of the more important nodes i use had a broken blockchain (using the vanilla protoshares client)
ppps. of course this happened while i was sleeping...
« Last Edit: December 03, 2013, 09:24:53 am by xolokram »
stats for [email protected]
BTC: 1S4kxaF4ro17qThUz4hQwAoiXzCWdzwdb | LTC: LMgYASNbAgGUG6fhw1xdMAWSbMiWjNNGgo
XPM: AJhA1PGbNM94ZmsJvVVM5FfbE9SdxiMzgd | PTS: PbfspbvSWxYqrp3DpRH7bsrmEqzY3418Ap

Offline recci

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 17
    • View Profile
Re: [ANN] ptsweb.beeeeer.org - Protoshares mining sub-pool
« Reply #739 on: December 03, 2013, 10:35:25 am »
This coin is incredibly hard to mine, I have been mining on an off for 4 or 5 days on 2 intel core i5's with 4 threads each and I still only have 0.04345 PTS. I thought is was meant to be mine-able for anybody, at this rate its not going to be profitable at all! Especially with the sky high cost of electricity in the uk....waste if time imo

Offline BitThink

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 10
    • View Profile
Re: [ANN] ptsweb.beeeeer.org - Protoshares mining sub-pool
« Reply #740 on: December 03, 2013, 10:41:55 am »
Oops, lost whole day's mining. :(

@recci
Are you using optimized mining program? Your mining income seems one order of magnitude less than the normal value to me.
« Last Edit: December 03, 2013, 10:50:16 am by BitThink »

Offline devilfish

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 98
    • View Profile
Re: [ANN] ptsweb.beeeeer.org - Protoshares mining sub-pool
« Reply #741 on: December 03, 2013, 12:20:13 pm »
Love how people come in here expecting easy money. Get a job if your that desperate for money, don't put your hopes into mining a digital currency.
BTC: 1MqCxQ2qD7ZuS3ELFY43wfaBTbA2XkYwDP
PTS: PiuFEJHz6zScALgPWzcu2SDKtWJW4cnUFi
XPM: Af5qzgsEwWaHZdGUq8dUoHkhmH4XBmnGW9

Offline btc2084

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 24
    • View Profile
Re: [ANN] ptsweb.beeeeer.org - Protoshares mining sub-pool
« Reply #742 on: December 03, 2013, 12:27:01 pm »
Dear Xolokram,

Is this a bug?  When my DSL modem was powered off and then on, ptsminer crashed. 

The last message I think I saw was that it would retry after 10-seconds but I think right after that the window closed and it generated a crash dump.

For people with spotty internet connectivity you might want to try unplugging the ethernet to see how the app responds.  It crashed on my Win 8.1 box.

Thanks for your continued bug fixing.

hi,

it looks like the pool completely lost the connection to the protoshares network (necessary to create work for the miners)
starting to produce orphans and being unable to give up-to-date data :( i'm sorry about this inconvenience

i'm currently restarting/reconnecting everything and checking what caused all this

- xolokram

ps. ok, everything has been restarted, i guess some of the remaining blocks are orphans too  :-\
pps. looks like one of the more important nodes i use had a broken blockchain (using the vanilla protoshares client)
ppps. of course this happened while i was sleeping...
« Last Edit: December 03, 2013, 12:33:39 pm by btc2084 »

Offline sony87

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 2
    • View Profile
Re: [ANN] ptsweb.beeeeer.org - Protoshares mining sub-pool
« Reply #743 on: December 03, 2013, 12:32:04 pm »
Hello Xolo, lost connection to the protoshare network has caused the orphaned blocks and that no more block generation happen every hour like before ? I just put 30cores to mine and got nothing from last night :(

Offline recci

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 17
    • View Profile
Re: [ANN] ptsweb.beeeeer.org - Protoshares mining sub-pool
« Reply #744 on: December 03, 2013, 12:39:33 pm »
Love how people come in here expecting easy money. Get a job if your that desperate for money, don't put your hopes into mining a digital currency.

Have a job mate! and don’t expect easy money. Just pointing out that this is probably not profitable for the average user to mine.

Love how people make over blown reactions to comments :P

Offline btc2084

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 24
    • View Profile
Re: [ANN] ptsweb.beeeeer.org - Protoshares mining sub-pool
« Reply #745 on: December 03, 2013, 12:46:38 pm »
I'm totally confused about all the "collision found" and "submitted share --> REJECTED" messages.

Do the messages below mean I'm not successfully mining?  Should I just go back to XPM?


[MASTER] submitted share -> REJECTED
[STATS] 2013-Dec-03 06:40:51 | 109.8 c/m | 4.0 sh/m | VL: 52 (82.5%), RJ: 11 (17.5%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[WORKER] collision found: 65298305 <-> 63144468 #1762 @ 1386074483 by 3
[MASTER] submitted share -> REJECTED
[STATS] 2013-Dec-03 06:41:04 | 110.6 c/m | 4.0 sh/m | VL: 52 (81.2%), RJ: 12 (18.8%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[WORKER] collision found: 36950812 <-> 30198943 #1770 @ 1386074509 by 5
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
[STATS] 2013-Dec-03 06:41:12 | 110.8 c/m | 4.0 sh/m | VL: 53 (81.5%), RJ: 12 (18.5%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[WORKER] collision found: 61666229 <-> 11175757 #1798 @ 1386074502 by 6
[MASTER] submitted share -> REJECTED
[STATS] 2013-Dec-03 06:41:15 | 111.6 c/m | 4.1 sh/m | VL: 53 (80.3%), RJ: 13 (19.7%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[WORKER] collision found: 53826084 <-> 31172614 #1800 @ 1386074503 by 7
[MASTER] submitted share -> REJECTED
[STATS] 2013-Dec-03 06:41:18 | 111.3 c/m | 4.1 sh/m | VL: 53 (79.1%), RJ: 14 (20.9%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[WORKER] collision found: 16964194 <-> 40092960 #1808 @ 1386074525 by 5
[WORKER] collision found: 43809248 <-> 41984804 #1810 @ 1386074526 by 6
[MASTER] work received - sharetarget: 07ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffbeefde4d
[MASTER] submitted share -> REJECTED
[STATS] 2013-Dec-03 06:41:23 | 111.5 c/m | 4.2 sh/m | VL: 53 (77.9%), RJ: 15 (22.1%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[MASTER] submitted share -> REJECTED
[STATS] 2013-Dec-03 06:41:23 | 111.5 c/m | 4.2 sh/m | VL: 53 (76.8%), RJ: 16 (23.2%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[WORKER] collision found: 30667112 <-> 26709513 #1820 @ 1386074490 by 2
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
[STATS] 2013-Dec-03 06:41:29 | 111.6 c/m | 4.3 sh/m | VL: 54 (77.1%), RJ: 16 (22.9%), ST: 0 (0.0%)


hi,

it looks like the pool completely lost the connection to the protoshares network (necessary to create work for the miners)
starting to produce orphans and being unable to give up-to-date data :( i'm sorry about this inconvenience

i'm currently restarting/reconnecting everything and checking what caused all this

- xolokram

ps. ok, everything has been restarted, i guess some of the remaining blocks are orphans too  :-\
pps. looks like one of the more important nodes i use had a broken blockchain (using the vanilla protoshares client)
ppps. of course this happened while i was sleeping...

Offline kargul

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 1
    • View Profile
Re: [ANN] ptsweb.beeeeer.org - Protoshares mining sub-pool
« Reply #746 on: December 03, 2013, 01:01:16 pm »
I'm totally confused about all the "collision found" and "submitted share --> REJECTED" messages.

Do the messages below mean I'm not successfully mining?  Should I just go back to XPM?


[MASTER] submitted share -> REJECTED
[STATS] 2013-Dec-03 06:40:51 | 109.8 c/m | 4.0 sh/m | VL: 52 (82.5%), RJ: 11 (17.5%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[WORKER] collision found: 65298305 <-> 63144468 #1762 @ 1386074483 by 3
[MASTER] submitted share -> REJECTED
[STATS] 2013-Dec-03 06:41:04 | 110.6 c/m | 4.0 sh/m | VL: 52 (81.2%), RJ: 12 (18.8%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[WORKER] collision found: 36950812 <-> 30198943 #1770 @ 1386074509 by 5
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
[STATS] 2013-Dec-03 06:41:12 | 110.8 c/m | 4.0 sh/m | VL: 53 (81.5%), RJ: 12 (18.5%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[WORKER] collision found: 61666229 <-> 11175757 #1798 @ 1386074502 by 6
[MASTER] submitted share -> REJECTED
[STATS] 2013-Dec-03 06:41:15 | 111.6 c/m | 4.1 sh/m | VL: 53 (80.3%), RJ: 13 (19.7%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[WORKER] collision found: 53826084 <-> 31172614 #1800 @ 1386074503 by 7
[MASTER] submitted share -> REJECTED
[STATS] 2013-Dec-03 06:41:18 | 111.3 c/m | 4.1 sh/m | VL: 53 (79.1%), RJ: 14 (20.9%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[WORKER] collision found: 16964194 <-> 40092960 #1808 @ 1386074525 by 5
[WORKER] collision found: 43809248 <-> 41984804 #1810 @ 1386074526 by 6
[MASTER] work received - sharetarget: 07ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffbeefde4d
[MASTER] submitted share -> REJECTED
[STATS] 2013-Dec-03 06:41:23 | 111.5 c/m | 4.2 sh/m | VL: 53 (77.9%), RJ: 15 (22.1%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[MASTER] submitted share -> REJECTED
[STATS] 2013-Dec-03 06:41:23 | 111.5 c/m | 4.2 sh/m | VL: 53 (76.8%), RJ: 16 (23.2%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[WORKER] collision found: 30667112 <-> 26709513 #1820 @ 1386074490 by 2
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
[STATS] 2013-Dec-03 06:41:29 | 111.6 c/m | 4.3 sh/m | VL: 54 (77.1%), RJ: 16 (22.9%), ST: 0 (0.0%)


Everything is fine, wait for blocks :D Where do you mine?

Offline Troglodactyl

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 960
    • View Profile
Re: [ANN] ptsweb.beeeeer.org - Protoshares mining sub-pool
« Reply #747 on: December 03, 2013, 02:05:02 pm »
Clone from here and it will failover from beeeeer to rpool.

https://github.com/Troglodactyl/pts.git

Sounds good. Did you change anything else besides the auto failover?


I just added the additional pool to a list, and have it waiting for 3 seconds for work when it tries to connect.  If the pool doesn't give it work it disconnects and tries connecting to the next pool.  Kind of ugly with the hard coded pool list, but it was a quick hack to get my miners back up and hopefully keep them up.

Offline devilfish

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 98
    • View Profile
Re: [ANN] ptsweb.beeeeer.org - Protoshares mining sub-pool
« Reply #748 on: December 03, 2013, 02:54:56 pm »
Love how people come in here expecting easy money. Get a job if your that desperate for money, don't put your hopes into mining a digital currency.

Have a job mate! and don’t expect easy money. Just pointing out that this is probably not profitable for the average user to mine.

Love how people make over blown reactions to comments :P

So why come and tell us, we already know this, you aren't adding anything.
BTC: 1MqCxQ2qD7ZuS3ELFY43wfaBTbA2XkYwDP
PTS: PiuFEJHz6zScALgPWzcu2SDKtWJW4cnUFi
XPM: Af5qzgsEwWaHZdGUq8dUoHkhmH4XBmnGW9

Offline jabbaah

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 28
    • View Profile
Re: [ANN] ptsweb.beeeeer.org - Protoshares mining sub-pool
« Reply #749 on: December 03, 2013, 03:02:05 pm »
For me it seems that the reject rate it going up for miners which do not have that my cores.

I am currently using 2x 32 core AWS spot instances for testing throughput, an 8 core i7
and a couple of 3 core virtual machines.

The reject rate for the 32 core monsters is below 1%
Reject rate for the 8 core is below 2%

And the reject rate for the 3 core things is at about 15% !!!
(I have 11 of those, and ALL of them have high reject rates)

I think I can see some pattern in this...

Unfortunately I don't know enough of the underlying work distribution software,
but maybe I am not the only one experiencing this situation and it would be
great if there might be some fine-tuning possible?

Who has the same experience?
http://www.dmsp.de/Protoshares   ---   https://github.com/spommerening/ptstools
PTS: PouLU5HendYGqZXwHnzdvBeMboJsUu1z2b   ---   BTC: 1QLNqVxhi3JrC8A4PfTF7jCoSi4h4pQV1R