Author Topic: [Witness Proposal] blckchnd  (Read 13296 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline blockchained

Re: [Witness Proposal] blckchnd
« Reply #60 on: August 25, 2020, 05:52:58 pm »



abit you are criminal and deserve a jail

you started this shit with bots, I even don't have the right to add one

But if thuleee baned you by your own methods, he have my support

You are a cancer of bitshares
« Last Edit: September 30, 2020, 05:58:01 pm by blockchained »

Offline blockchained

Re: [Witness Proposal] blckchnd
« Reply #61 on: August 25, 2020, 05:54:19 pm »

don't forget to add that you muted me and other admins first and deleted all history first, this was just reaction on your abuse

everyone could check the time who started this mess



« Last Edit: September 30, 2020, 05:58:27 pm by blockchained »

Offline blockchained

Re: [Witness Proposal] blckchnd
« Reply #62 on: August 25, 2020, 05:55:17 pm »

all this sentence are addressed to you and fits you very well, you deserve each word and more
« Last Edit: September 30, 2020, 05:58:59 pm by blockchained »

Offline blockchained

Re: [Witness Proposal] blckchnd
« Reply #63 on: August 25, 2020, 05:57:53 pm »
Thanks to your friend Thule.

cool, finally someone forced you to eat the same dish,
you are abuser abit, you lost your ethic, you silently banned admins long before thulee decide to react,  I can witness that

So you first started this dictatorship in the chat with silent bans by your bot for opinion against your agenda


Is this some kind of Chinese tradition to punish everyone around without any proof or excuse?


Poor abit you really look miserable in your fall

you just a criminal and deserve what will come to you
Marked.

your fraud and abuse of the system will be soon widely known, so just enjoy the ride fraudster


« Last Edit: October 02, 2020, 04:55:50 pm by blockchained »

Offline blockchained

Re: [Witness Proposal] blckchnd
« Reply #64 on: August 25, 2020, 07:40:07 pm »
Thanks to your friend Thule.


You still didn't answer me what I'm to do with this bot, why you mute me?
Or you mute gateway owner that produces fees and bring users and volume, just because I support thuleee opinion that criticize your behavior? 
« Last Edit: August 25, 2020, 07:53:27 pm by blockchained »

Offline blockchained

Re: [Witness Proposal] blckchnd
« Reply #65 on: August 29, 2020, 10:35:46 am »
From this moment RuDEX team stop to participate in this forum.
This forum occupied with admins that abuse their admin power and supports malicious actions with Github.
All further RuDEX announcements will be published in our official channels:

https://steemit.com/@rudex
https://golos.id/@rudex
https://twitter.com/rudex_bitshares
https://t.me/BitSharesDEX_RU
« Last Edit: August 29, 2020, 10:59:32 am by blockchained »

Offline blockchained

Re: [Witness Proposal] blckchnd
« Reply #66 on: September 29, 2020, 02:55:47 pm »
After abit trojan took place yesterday we've stopped our witness infrastructure for bitshares.

We have a capable team of core and UI devs, so we're preparing a fork of bitshares code base, back to the consensus rules that was before the abit abuse on github.
It will be a new distribution, a new chain, and a new genesis.
 
News will come latter with announcements.

 

Offline alt

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2821
    • View Profile
  • BitShares: baozi
Re: [Witness Proposal] blckchnd
« Reply #67 on: October 02, 2020, 02:31:29 am »
It's so bad to see you decide to step away too.
I respect you and wish you have a good process.

But if it's possible, May I  ask you to stay with Bitshares for more time?
Too many big argument the community have made recent years, but they are not a big deal indeed compare today.
People come and go, Bitshares is still here, you should stay with it if you still have faith in it.

You have development team, please step in the core development work.
Your business is the exchange gateway, pay more attention to the crypto asset instead of smart coin.
we can have more opportunity if we stay together than fork alone.

I still have faith in Bitshares, wish you too.

After abit trojan took place yesterday we've stopped our witness infrastructure for bitshares.

We have a capable team of core and UI devs, so we're preparing a fork of bitshares code base, back to the consensus rules that was before the abit abuse on github.
It will be a new distribution, a new chain, and a new genesis.
 
News will come latter with announcements.

Offline blockchained

Re: [Witness Proposal] blckchnd
« Reply #68 on: October 02, 2020, 11:34:33 am »
It's so bad to see you decide to step away too.
I respect you and wish you have a good process.

We've observed and supported this project for the last four years. But the last events that happened force us to do this step.
We can't tolerate github abuse from one core dev
We can't tolerate trojan that was delivered by audit worker
We can't tolerate broke of consensus that was publicly acknowledged by core manager Milos
We can't tolerate the staking mechanism that was enforced with 0 discussions and completely changed consensus and voting behavior
The staking problem that was implemented with no discussion and I guess without any modulation is that it's not scalable and it hit hard by "voting apathy" because you have no intention in staking, you gain nothing besides the "governance drama"
The "abit precedent" vanished any trust in the current blockchain consensus & witnesses and operating on it can be just not safe.
Even if everyone starts to play with his staking rules what guarantee we have that he will not abuse github again and broke consensus again? This is a rhetorical question.
 
But if it's possible, May I  ask you to stay with Bitshares for more time?
As a RuDEX gateway and registration-faucet and services we will be here if it is profitable for us, but I know the plans of current core group to enforce KYC on gateways and double tax the gateways assets and gateways liquidity, if this happens in this case we will migrate.

Too many big argument the community have made recent years, but they are not a big deal indeed compare today.
People come and go, Bitshares is still here, you should stay with it if you still have faith in it.
Never before was this kind of admin power abuse in Bitshares, so it's not about "people come and go" it's about safety.
Big part of Chinese community already split, but they also forked 4.0 code.
We believe not in Bitshares as a brand name or so, we like the tool that was before 4.0, with liquid voting and without double taxation, and this code doesn't exist now not in bitshares not in newshares. So we have no choice than start a new chain in attempt to save the tool in form we liked it.


You have development team, please step in the core development work.
We saw attempts that was blocked, abit refused give up his position in github and after his abuse I have no reason to work with dev with such ethics, so I don't understand how you plan to put someone besides him there?


Your business is the exchange gateway, pay more attention to the crypto asset instead of smart coin.

Sad true, but bitshares already not unique with UIA, so already exist better alternatives in this case,
Decentralization is a product and abit just broke this product made voting participation even less. 5% in dpos is really looks like a joke

we can have more opportunity if we stay together than fork alone.

I still have faith in Bitshares, wish you too.
Like I stated above we have a faith in the tool not in the brand name, but with the consensus that doesn't exist now, it is one of the reasons for our attempt to save this tool.
Only this way we can fix a reviving hole, and other mistakes that will never be fixed here because of a greed.

But if you have an idea how to fix bitshares issue with lack of trust to current situation don't hesitate to shoot me PM
If you have plan to fight back abit abuse we will support it too, we have a big server park so if the situation in bitshares changes it not hard to start rudex block producer here,

but as a blckchnd team we will work on a new chain to save a tool we fell in love, welcome btw.
« Last Edit: October 02, 2020, 04:51:56 pm by blockchained »

Offline alt

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2821
    • View Profile
  • BitShares: baozi
Re: [Witness Proposal] blckchnd
« Reply #69 on: October 02, 2020, 01:18:13 pm »
We've observed and supported this project for the last four years. But the last events that happened force us to do this step.
We can't tolerate github abuse from one core dev
We can't tolerate trojan that was delivered by audit worker
We can't tolerate broke of consensus that was publicly acknowledged by core manager Milos
We can't tolerate the staking mechanism that was enforced with 0 discussions and completely changed consensus and voting behavior
The staking problem that was implemented with no discussion and I guess without any modulation is that it's not scalable and it hit hard by "voting apathy" because you have no intention in staking, you gain nothing besides the "governance drama"
The "abit precedent" vanished any trust in the current blockchain consensus & witnesses and operating on it can be just not safe.
Even if everyone starts to play with his staking rules what guarantee we have that he will not abuse github again and broke consensus again? This is a rhetorical question.

We saw attempts that was blocked, abit refused give up his position in github and after his abuse I have no reason to work with dev with such ethics, so I don't understand how you plan to put someone besides him there?

I agree all these things are ridiculous.
I think it's not a big deal to change to another official github address if we have enough vote power.
The real problem is it seems we are lack of reliable development team always, a team which truly serve the business.

I wish the business person include you and bitcrab and others can have more comunication, if you can reach a consensus, I will support with my vote.

Offline abit

  • Committee member
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 4511
    • View Profile
    • Abit's Hive Blog
  • BitShares: abit
  • GitHub: abitmore
Re: [Witness Proposal] blckchnd
« Reply #70 on: October 02, 2020, 08:56:22 pm »
I wish the business person include you and bitcrab and others can have more comunication, if you can reach a consensus, I will support with my vote.
不知道你是真傻还是装傻,还在幻想你口中所谓的 business person 来拯救你。
CryptoBridge OpenLedger SparkDEX 给的教训还不够吗?还有 Deex 之流就不说了。

就算掰开手指数现在还在 BitShares 的公司机构,
也要先看 Move Institute , XBTS , ioBanker , 甚至 BEOS 。
什么时候轮得到 RuDEX ? RuDEX 根本都不是注册公司。

RuDEX 有关联开发团队不假。社区出钱开发的btspp手机钱包,他换个皮就是自己的了。申请一个 UI worker 拿了一百万多万没做完。后来又想申请 core worker 拿钱,我说你先提交点代码让我看看,结果没声了。回头变成我不放权?

你的聪明才智哪里去了?一个 Thule 天天在你耳边吹风,就只有他说的才是真话?
不说别的。他说锁喂价好你就支持锁喂价。 RuDEX 完全是反对锁喂价的,他有没有和你说?
他天天黑巨蟹你没听见过?还幻想巨蟹和他和RuDEX合作。
醒醒。
BTS account: abit
BTS committee member: abit
BTS witness: in.abit

Offline abit

  • Committee member
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 4511
    • View Profile
    • Abit's Hive Blog
  • BitShares: abit
  • GitHub: abitmore
Re: [Witness Proposal] blckchnd
« Reply #71 on: October 02, 2020, 09:06:11 pm »

I wish the business person include you and bitcrab and others can have more comunication, if you can reach a consensus, I will support with my vote.

再转点东西你看看。
什么样的一条链会被其它两条链控制?这算不算得上是币圈奇葩?认识不到这些还在那里妄谈什么共识呢?

什么样的人会对持异见者进行各种人身语言攻击,满口fuck呢?就因为作为网关就有了随心所欲fuck别人的权力?

alt你知道你在交谈的人在电报上是什么样的一副面孔吗?

这么多年得过且过,自欺欺人,掩耳盗铃式的面对问题,处理问题,你们希望能够得到一个什么样的好的结果?

个个票仓都跟嘉靖万历一样的,试问这条链能够有一个什么样的好结果呢?

一个国家难道也要给持有商务或者旅行或者游学签证的人投票权吗?

DPOS治理是不是贿选横行?你们有仔细想过或者试着去解决吗?

一条链只有什么是不可或缺的,是核心代币还是矿工?核心代币是不可或缺的吗?

一些人并没有追求如何使一条链的治理更公平、更合理,恰恰相反,他们在追求的是一种畸形的共识体系或者更加确切的说是利益作祟,他们不愿也不想看到在BM在DPOS上一些票权获得方式的迭代,

你们是否仔细想过,对一条链而言,核心代币票权治理真的合适吗?

我想大家都是成年人,有独立思考的能力,但是能够听信别人一遍遍的忽悠也算是一绝了。

连临时对代币的控制成本与时间成本都不想失去的人,能够做好与参与好什么样的治理?
BTS account: abit
BTS committee member: abit
BTS witness: in.abit

Offline blockchained

Re: [Witness Proposal] blckchnd
« Reply #72 on: October 03, 2020, 12:43:00 am »
I wish the business person include you and bitcrab and others can have more comunication, if you can reach a consensus, I will support with my vote.
不知道你是真傻还是装傻,还在幻想你口中所谓的 business person 来拯救你。
CryptoBridge OpenLedger SparkDEX 给的教训还不够吗?还有 Deex 之流就不说了。

就算掰开手指数现在还在 BitShares 的公司机构,
也要先看 Move Institute , XBTS , ioBanker , 甚至 BEOS 。
什么时候轮得到 RuDEX ? RuDEX 根本都不是注册公司。

RuDEX 有关联开发团队不假。社区出钱开发的btspp手机钱包,他换个皮就是自己的了。申请一个 UI worker 拿了一百万多万没做完。后来又想申请 core worker 拿钱,我说你先提交点代码让我看看,结果没声了。回头变成我不放权?

你的聪明才智哪里去了?一个 Thule 天天在你耳边吹风,就只有他说的才是真话?
不说别的。他说锁喂价好你就支持锁喂价。 RuDEX 完全是反对锁喂价的,他有没有和你说?
他天天黑巨蟹你没听见过?还幻想巨蟹和他和RuDEX合作。
醒醒。

so many lies from you abit,
you are pitty

Offline btstodamoon

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 111
    • View Profile
Re: [Witness Proposal] blckchnd
« Reply #73 on: October 03, 2020, 01:24:55 am »
支持abit

Offline xixi002020

Re: [Witness Proposal] blckchnd
« Reply #74 on: October 03, 2020, 01:50:31 am »
I wish the business person include you and bitcrab and others can have more comunication, if you can reach a consensus, I will support with my vote.
不知道你是真傻还是装傻,还在幻想你口中所谓的 business person 来拯救你。
CryptoBridge OpenLedger SparkDEX 给的教训还不够吗?还有 Deex 之流就不说了。

就算掰开手指数现在还在 BitShares 的公司机构,
也要先看 Move Institute , XBTS , ioBanker , 甚至 BEOS 。
什么时候轮得到 RuDEX ? RuDEX 根本都不是注册公司。

RuDEX 有关联开发团队不假。社区出钱开发的btspp手机钱包,他换个皮就是自己的了。申请一个 UI worker 拿了一百万多万没做完。后来又想申请 core worker 拿钱,我说你先提交点代码让我看看,结果没声了。回头变成我不放权?

你的聪明才智哪里去了?一个 Thule 天天在你耳边吹风,就只有他说的才是真话?
不说别的。他说锁喂价好你就支持锁喂价。 RuDEX 完全是反对锁喂价的,他有没有和你说?
他天天黑巨蟹你没听见过?还幻想巨蟹和他和RuDEX合作。
醒醒。

so many lies from you abit,
you are pitty


社区出钱开发的btspp手机钱包,他换个皮就是自己的了    这个不假吧!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!    还能不承认?都知道的事情