Author Topic: Force settlement offset  (Read 2398 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline biophil

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 880
  • Professor of Computer Science
    • View Profile
    • My Academic Website
  • BitShares: biophil
I'm not even convinced that the offset benefits shorters, TBH. I mean it certainly benefited people who had open short positions at the time, but for new positions it's a wash. All it does is move the price down, which means that opening a short position now happens at a slightly lower price. It's just silly.
Support our research efforts to improve BitAsset price-pegging! Vote for worker 1.14.204 "201907-uccs-research-project."

Offline yvv

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1186
    • View Profile
Thanks for linking that discussion. The discussion is so painful. It's one of a million more "hey all let's go tweak this parameter very slightly in favor of X user group over Y user group, because hey, most of us voting types are X user group anyway and nobody from Y user group is here to protest! It will solve perceived problem Z while predictably creating a new set of problems A, B, and C!"

And now, the forseeable consequence is that now that we have much higher liquidity bitassets, they all trade below the peg.

Ha-ha, you are so right here  :)

Offline biophil

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 880
  • Professor of Computer Science
    • View Profile
    • My Academic Website
  • BitShares: biophil

If so, what is the purpose of this?

Here's the original discussion: https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,22355.0.html

Thanks for linking that discussion. The discussion is so painful. It's one of a million more "hey all let's go tweak this parameter very slightly in favor of X user group over Y user group, because hey, most of us voting types are X user group anyway and nobody from Y user group is here to protest! It will solve perceived problem Z while predictably creating a new set of problems A, B, and C!"

And now, the forseeable consequence is that now that we have much higher liquidity bitassets, they all trade below the peg.
Support our research efforts to improve BitAsset price-pegging! Vote for worker 1.14.204 "201907-uccs-research-project."

Offline pc

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1530
    • View Profile
    • Bitcoin - Perspektive oder Risiko?
  • BitShares: cyrano
The big smartcoins all seem to have a parameter called "force settlement offset" set to 1%. What is this? Does it mean that you get only 99% of the face-value BTS when you request a settlement?

Yes, basically.

If so, what is the purpose of this?

Here's the original discussion: https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,22355.0.html
Bitcoin - Perspektive oder Risiko? ISBN 978-3-8442-6568-2 http://bitcoin.quisquis.de

Offline Brekyrself

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 514
    • View Profile
I recall @bitcrab & @pc having a in depth discussion on this awhile back.

This forum is difficult to search however here are two interesting threads to read:

https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,16143.0.html
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,20356.0.html

Offline yvv

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1186
    • View Profile
Quote
Does it mean that you get only 99% of the face-value BTS when you request a settlement?

Yes.

Quote
BTS when you request a settlement?

To discourage forced settlement.  Why we need to discourage forced settlement is another question.

Offline biophil

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 880
  • Professor of Computer Science
    • View Profile
    • My Academic Website
  • BitShares: biophil
The big smartcoins all seem to have a parameter called "force settlement offset" set to 1%. What is this? Does it mean that you get only 99% of the face-value BTS when you request a settlement?

If so, what is the purpose of this?
Support our research efforts to improve BitAsset price-pegging! Vote for worker 1.14.204 "201907-uccs-research-project."