0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Yeah, lots of incentive to get it right the first time
Quote from: sschechter on January 30, 2014, 03:09:46 amDoes this mean to treat our test shares as if they were the real thing because they might become so at any moment? Only a critical failure that requires a restart will reset their value?For XT to be testable they have to have nonzero value. They get that value from the fact that the current version could become the real one. We will all discover this together.
Does this mean to treat our test shares as if they were the real thing because they might become so at any moment? Only a critical failure that requires a restart will reset their value?
Quote from: sumantso on January 29, 2014, 07:09:22 pmQuote from: jifehuang on January 29, 2014, 06:41:45 pmAfter Feb 28 AGS investors will have a hard time making decisions, especially for investment in BTC. If the first testnet becomes successfully, the AGS obtained in Mar and later gives you no BTS.They give you shares in future DACs, icluding new chains of BTSX. Say, a floating interest is implemented in a future chain which releases in April; then each AGS will give you 2 shares in that new chain (while PTS will give you some 1.5).Bytemaster has said if the new DACs don't require much extra work they will be very likely awarded 50/50 to AGS/PTS.Still confusion. If the first chain is successful, why will there be a second chain? If the second chain contains new features, how to ensure people to adopt it when many are already using the first chain (some may even made a profit on it) ? Is it introducing competition among BTSv1 and BTSv2, and possibly more to come?
Quote from: jifehuang on January 29, 2014, 06:41:45 pmAfter Feb 28 AGS investors will have a hard time making decisions, especially for investment in BTC. If the first testnet becomes successfully, the AGS obtained in Mar and later gives you no BTS.They give you shares in future DACs, icluding new chains of BTSX. Say, a floating interest is implemented in a future chain which releases in April; then each AGS will give you 2 shares in that new chain (while PTS will give you some 1.5).Bytemaster has said if the new DACs don't require much extra work they will be very likely awarded 50/50 to AGS/PTS.
After Feb 28 AGS investors will have a hard time making decisions, especially for investment in BTC. If the first testnet becomes successfully, the AGS obtained in Mar and later gives you no BTS.
Why not take a snapshot on the 28th and let us all beta test it for a month to fix any bugs? If all works out take a final snapshot and official launch the following month?
This process of launching test networks that "might be final release" networks will continue until all bugs are found. This is necessary because for a test network to function it must have a non-0 value otherwise bitasset evaluation results in divide by 0 errors.
so nobody know which version will success.I have no courage to test the function by buy or sell my bts. maybe tomorrow the price is totally different.All I can do is do nothing before I know it is success.
Do I understand this correctly?If I want Angelshares that are awarded with BTS I need to purchase (via donation) them definitely before Feb 28, correct?What happens with donations that are sent out after this date?
If Feb 28 is the final snapshot, then AGS is converted to BTS at about 3.5:1. Every fail means a new snapshot is taken and the ratio lowers. Correct?
so nobody know which version will success.I have no courage to test the function by buy or sell my bts. maybe tomorrow the price is totally different.All I can do is do nothing before I know it is success.Quote from: bytemaster on January 29, 2014, 05:56:46 amQuote from: alt on January 29, 2014, 05:55:06 amQuote from: bytemaster on January 29, 2014, 05:26:58 amYes, we are preparing a mass mailing on this topic. If BitShares X Test is successful we will simply drop the Test from the name, if it fails in some manner that is unrecoverable then a new snapshot will be used. Thus the value of the BTS (and BitUSD etc) in the test chain must factor in probability of catastrophic failure and reset of the chain. It should go up over time as the likelihood of failure decreases. This process of launching test networks that "might be final release" networks will continue until all bugs are found. This is necessary because for a test network to function it must have a non-0 value otherwise bitasset evaluation results in divide by 0 errors. Note that having many parallel chains was always in the plan and a version 2 chain with variable interest rates set by market forces will come out later as well. So some bugs that result in the launch of a new chain may not mean the complete death of the initial test chain. If the initial test chain has any residual value or can be 'patched' then it might take on a life of its own. very confuse... How can a clarify?
Quote from: alt on January 29, 2014, 05:55:06 amQuote from: bytemaster on January 29, 2014, 05:26:58 amYes, we are preparing a mass mailing on this topic. If BitShares X Test is successful we will simply drop the Test from the name, if it fails in some manner that is unrecoverable then a new snapshot will be used. Thus the value of the BTS (and BitUSD etc) in the test chain must factor in probability of catastrophic failure and reset of the chain. It should go up over time as the likelihood of failure decreases. This process of launching test networks that "might be final release" networks will continue until all bugs are found. This is necessary because for a test network to function it must have a non-0 value otherwise bitasset evaluation results in divide by 0 errors. Note that having many parallel chains was always in the plan and a version 2 chain with variable interest rates set by market forces will come out later as well. So some bugs that result in the launch of a new chain may not mean the complete death of the initial test chain. If the initial test chain has any residual value or can be 'patched' then it might take on a life of its own. very confuse... How can a clarify?
Quote from: bytemaster on January 29, 2014, 05:26:58 amYes, we are preparing a mass mailing on this topic. If BitShares X Test is successful we will simply drop the Test from the name, if it fails in some manner that is unrecoverable then a new snapshot will be used. Thus the value of the BTS (and BitUSD etc) in the test chain must factor in probability of catastrophic failure and reset of the chain. It should go up over time as the likelihood of failure decreases. This process of launching test networks that "might be final release" networks will continue until all bugs are found. This is necessary because for a test network to function it must have a non-0 value otherwise bitasset evaluation results in divide by 0 errors. Note that having many parallel chains was always in the plan and a version 2 chain with variable interest rates set by market forces will come out later as well. So some bugs that result in the launch of a new chain may not mean the complete death of the initial test chain. If the initial test chain has any residual value or can be 'patched' then it might take on a life of its own. very confuse...
Yes, we are preparing a mass mailing on this topic. If BitShares X Test is successful we will simply drop the Test from the name, if it fails in some manner that is unrecoverable then a new snapshot will be used. Thus the value of the BTS (and BitUSD etc) in the test chain must factor in probability of catastrophic failure and reset of the chain. It should go up over time as the likelihood of failure decreases. This process of launching test networks that "might be final release" networks will continue until all bugs are found. This is necessary because for a test network to function it must have a non-0 value otherwise bitasset evaluation results in divide by 0 errors. Note that having many parallel chains was always in the plan and a version 2 chain with variable interest rates set by market forces will come out later as well. So some bugs that result in the launch of a new chain may not mean the complete death of the initial test chain. If the initial test chain has any residual value or can be 'patched' then it might take on a life of its own.
Does this mean keyhotee genesis block is definitely before feb 28th, since keyhotee private keys get some BTS?
Quote from: unlimited_power on January 29, 2014, 05:11:35 amQuote from: bytemaster on January 29, 2014, 01:46:53 amQuote from: mitao on January 29, 2014, 12:38:16 amSo it is test chain only? If the test is working well, will there be another snapshot, or just using the snapshot on Feb 28th?Sent from my iPhone using TapatalkIf it works well then it will have much value, if it fails there will be a new snapshot. There will of course be many other chains and snapshots.Please clarify: Does this mean that unless there is an issue warranting a new snapshot, then the snapshot taken on Feb. 28 for BitShares X Test will be the same snapshot used for BitShares X (Production)?If the answer is yes, then this is a huge deal. And there needs to be a huge notification/advertisement campaign so people can acquire PTS/AGS in time.Yes, we are preparing a mass mailing on this topic. If BitShares X Test is successful we will simply drop the Test from the name, if it fails in some manner that is unrecoverable then a new snapshot will be used. Thus the value of the BTS (and BitUSD etc) in the test chain must factor in probability of catastrophic failure and reset of the chain. It should go up over time as the likelihood of failure decreases. This process of launching test networks that "might be final release" networks will continue until all bugs are found. This is necessary because for a test network to function it must have a non-0 value otherwise bitasset evaluation results in divide by 0 errors. Note that having many parallel chains was always in the plan and a version 2 chain with variable interest rates set by market forces will come out later as well. So some bugs that result in the launch of a new chain may not mean the complete death of the initial test chain. If the initial test chain has any residual value or can be 'patched' then it might take on a life of its own.
Quote from: bytemaster on January 29, 2014, 01:46:53 amQuote from: mitao on January 29, 2014, 12:38:16 amSo it is test chain only? If the test is working well, will there be another snapshot, or just using the snapshot on Feb 28th?Sent from my iPhone using TapatalkIf it works well then it will have much value, if it fails there will be a new snapshot. There will of course be many other chains and snapshots.Please clarify: Does this mean that unless there is an issue warranting a new snapshot, then the snapshot taken on Feb. 28 for BitShares X Test will be the same snapshot used for BitShares X (Production)?If the answer is yes, then this is a huge deal. And there needs to be a huge notification/advertisement campaign so people can acquire PTS/AGS in time.
Quote from: mitao on January 29, 2014, 12:38:16 amSo it is test chain only? If the test is working well, will there be another snapshot, or just using the snapshot on Feb 28th?Sent from my iPhone using TapatalkIf it works well then it will have much value, if it fails there will be a new snapshot. There will of course be many other chains and snapshots.
So it is test chain only? If the test is working well, will there be another snapshot, or just using the snapshot on Feb 28th?Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Quote from: Stan on January 29, 2014, 04:02:07 amQuote from: bytemaster on January 29, 2014, 01:46:53 amQuote from: mitao on January 29, 2014, 12:38:16 amSo it is test chain only? If the test is working well, will there be another snapshot, or just using the snapshot on Feb 28th?Sent from my iPhone using TapatalkIf it works well then it will have much value, if it fails there will be a new snapshot. There will of course be many other chains and snapshots.Be sure to consider the serious risk that our Feb 28th chain, BitShares XT, could simply work the first time and thus enjoy a first-mover network effect all its own. Murphy's Law applies to itself too: "Anything that can go wrong will go wrong unless you are counting on it to go wrong."The same thought. But isn't it run on the central server?Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Quote from: bytemaster on January 29, 2014, 01:46:53 amQuote from: mitao on January 29, 2014, 12:38:16 amSo it is test chain only? If the test is working well, will there be another snapshot, or just using the snapshot on Feb 28th?Sent from my iPhone using TapatalkIf it works well then it will have much value, if it fails there will be a new snapshot. There will of course be many other chains and snapshots.Be sure to consider the serious risk that our Feb 28th chain, BitShares XT, could simply work the first time and thus enjoy a first-mover network effect all its own. Murphy's Law applies to itself too: "Anything that can go wrong will go wrong unless you are counting on it to go wrong."
Quote from: jae208 on January 27, 2014, 01:08:00 pmThis is fantastic! Is there a hard deadline for when Bitshares X should be officially out? Do you think BItshares x will be out no later than the Las Vegas conference?As always, it depends on how testing goes. We have noted that others are already helping to find and fix bugs in the current release. This certainly helps to accelerate things!The code that's out there right now also an opportunity for 3rd Party developers to start working early on all manner of supporting GUIs and value-added components.Thus, the answer to your question is really, "It depends on how much help we have."
This is fantastic! Is there a hard deadline for when Bitshares X should be officially out? Do you think BItshares x will be out no later than the Las Vegas conference?
So after the 28th february, 4M BTS will be allocated proportionally to AGS and PTS holders?
Quote from: yidaidaxia on January 27, 2014, 08:44:28 amGreat!So we will just test this feature(BTS X allocated to AGS/PTS) or also including other features of Bitshares X at Feb 28th test? Thanks.Quote from: bytemaster on January 26, 2014, 01:51:02 pmThe last BTC and PTS block on feb 28 th will be used for the snapshot of the bitshares XT blockchain. This will be the first feature complete test network. Sent from my iPhone using TapatalkTo my understanding, it's a feature complete version and we will test and report bugs for all the features.Cuz, for BTS genesis block allocation only, you don't need a whole test network.(Or, you can wait for bytemaster himself to confirm this.)
Great!So we will just test this feature(BTS X allocated to AGS/PTS) or also including other features of Bitshares X at Feb 28th test? Thanks.Quote from: bytemaster on January 26, 2014, 01:51:02 pmThe last BTC and PTS block on feb 28 th will be used for the snapshot of the bitshares XT blockchain. This will be the first feature complete test network. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The last BTC and PTS block on feb 28 th will be used for the snapshot of the bitshares XT blockchain. This will be the first feature complete test network. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
您的意思是2月28号之前的ags.pts分得bts4oo万?之后ags.pts还会存在一段时间。