Author Topic: AMD OpenCL Momentum miner  (Read 155638 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Aktor

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 1
    • View Profile
Re: fast AMD OpenCL PTS/NRS miner released
« Reply #810 on: April 30, 2014, 12:15:41 pm »
Hy,can somebody tell me how can I start mining NRS on Ypool with GPU 280X 3GB,pls.

Offline NewMine

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 551
    • View Profile
Re: fast AMD OpenCL PTS/NRS miner released
« Reply #811 on: May 01, 2014, 02:53:31 pm »
v1.2 with catalyst 13 is getting my HD7970's 4370 col/min for NRS and PTS. It's up over 33% with this update.  I was averaging 2960 col/min before.  Good job! And thank you.
« Last Edit: May 01, 2014, 08:24:39 pm by newmine »

Offline JoeyD

Re: fast AMD OpenCL PTS/NRS miner released
« Reply #812 on: May 01, 2014, 03:59:19 pm »
Catalyst 14 with the proper clpts-v1.2 for that driver on linux is averaging 5100 or possibly slightly more per 280X. I've setup a few gpu's now to try and help keep the network churning along.

Offline JohnD

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 76
    • View Profile
Re: fast AMD OpenCL PTS/NRS miner released
« Reply #813 on: May 01, 2014, 06:24:52 pm »
Great work. Win is still slower than linux but i am getting ~4800 c/m now with my 290x and Catalyst 14.
Donate if you like it:
PTS: Pi236u2LoqHjt8xs75YdQ7ZEFGuMqVd9sJ
BTC: 1AngSrJcBxG3zBks8DnPzvTU3Q2d678XaF

Offline Ykw

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 88
    • View Profile
Re: fast AMD OpenCL PTS/NRS miner released
« Reply #814 on: May 01, 2014, 07:01:09 pm »
Great work. Win is still slower than linux but i am getting ~4800 c/m now with my 290x and Catalyst 14.

yep...

After changing "-a 1" to "-a 0"...
290X (2 thread) - 4817 col/m (from 4679)...

Offline JohnD

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 76
    • View Profile
Re: fast AMD OpenCL PTS/NRS miner released
« Reply #815 on: May 01, 2014, 09:01:39 pm »
Great work. Win is still slower than linux but i am getting ~4800 c/m now with my 290x and Catalyst 14.

yep...

After changing "-a 1" to "-a 0"...
290X (2 thread) - 4817 col/m (from 4679)...

 ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ???
Thanks. "-a 1" was the fastest option for me so far but i tried "-a 0" again and i am getting ~5200 now.
Donate if you like it:
PTS: Pi236u2LoqHjt8xs75YdQ7ZEFGuMqVd9sJ
BTC: 1AngSrJcBxG3zBks8DnPzvTU3Q2d678XaF

Offline JoeyD

Re: fast AMD OpenCL PTS/NRS miner released
« Reply #816 on: May 01, 2014, 09:16:49 pm »
??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ???
Thanks. "-a 1" was the fastest option for me so far but i tried "-a 0" again and i am getting ~5200 now.

Yeah, I thought it was strange that you weren't getting a higher average then me. AMD linux drivers are not faster than the windows counterparts and I'm not overclocking my 280X, so it had to be something else.

Offline Mr305

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 11
    • View Profile
Re: fast AMD OpenCL PTS/NRS miner released
« Reply #817 on: May 02, 2014, 09:16:59 am »
Damn

AMD update 14.4 with nans v1.2 update, I get with a 280x Toxic 5200 c/m, bfeore 3600 c/m

You are a great Man.

Offline Ykw

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 88
    • View Profile
Re: fast AMD OpenCL PTS/NRS miner released
« Reply #818 on: May 02, 2014, 09:23:06 am »
NaN, do NVIDIA/AMD cards... profit from DMA access for multicard miner implementation?.. will have tons of memory for memory allocation. plus.. threads can be NUMA so... is it possible to design NRS/PTS algos with advantage on this?

SHA is more unlike i know.. but scrypt might have it's advantages...

EDIT: can you share with me a profiled data of your miner running over a 290/290X card? or do you want me to do run it?.. I would like to see if there is place for implementing something like this.. if you are interested.. give me a ping.
« Last Edit: May 02, 2014, 09:30:52 am by Ykw »

Offline Mario24

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 30
    • View Profile
Re: fast AMD OpenCL PTS/NRS miner released
« Reply #819 on: May 02, 2014, 09:46:05 am »
Damn

AMD update 14.4 with nans v1.2 update, I get with a 280x Toxic 5200 c/m, bfeore 3600 c/m

You are a great Man.

which option of-a?

how many sh / m?

I test also the 14.4 driver to date. I found out, that is the option in my R290x-t 1.1-a 1 on my Win7x64 and a monitor on the device. are best
« Last Edit: May 02, 2014, 09:59:20 am by Mario241077 »
donate BTC: 184qt6xvfhgyQnDCZvaAjPN3WtzudEs7Uz
donate ORB: oY6daworbXQNrn2ydgQPTVGtQ5Q3xWhQzg

Offline Ykw

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 88
    • View Profile
Re: fast AMD OpenCL PTS/NRS miner released
« Reply #820 on: May 02, 2014, 10:10:55 am »
Damn

AMD update 14.4 with nans v1.2 update, I get with a 280x Toxic 5200 c/m, bfeore 3600 c/m

You are a great Man.

which option of-a?

how many sh / m?

I test also the 14.4 driver to date. I found out, that is the option in my R290x-t 1.1-a 1 on my Win7x64 and a monitor on the device. are best

you have 4 optional codes to use with the miner.. using -a flag... you have 0, 1, 2 or 3...

Usually 0 is for 290/290X and 1 for others... but it depends a bit on the OS/Board/CPU... your setup in general..

Offline Mario24

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 30
    • View Profile
Re: fast AMD OpenCL PTS/NRS miner released
« Reply #821 on: May 02, 2014, 10:15:38 am »
I know how much sh / m do you get?
donate BTC: 184qt6xvfhgyQnDCZvaAjPN3WtzudEs7Uz
donate ORB: oY6daworbXQNrn2ydgQPTVGtQ5Q3xWhQzg

Offline Ykw

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 88
    • View Profile
Re: fast AMD OpenCL PTS/NRS miner released
« Reply #822 on: May 02, 2014, 10:19:37 am »
I know how much sh / m do you get?

fixed..
I get around 9.406 sh/m (4768 col/m) over the 290X.. but I would say.. this is not the usual value.. you should get above 5200 col/m... I have something preventing.. my card to pump... (acknowledged).

EDIT: Forgot I am EU... I use , for decimal... :S LOL
« Last Edit: May 02, 2014, 10:21:14 am by Ykw »

Offline Mario24

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 30
    • View Profile
Re: fast AMD OpenCL PTS/NRS miner released
« Reply #823 on: May 02, 2014, 10:24:47 am »
[MASTER] @ 12:23:14 | work received | sharetarget 0x0080000000000000000
000000000000000000000000000000000000
[WORKER1] share found: 20754872 <-> 18110106 #892 (433718) @ 1399026195
[WORKER1] share found: 39356499 <-> 24461962 #893 (433966) @ 1399026198
12:23:23 | 4636 c/m | 9.536 sh/m | VL: 884 (98.99%) | RJ: 9 (1.01%) | S
0%) | ART: 4.076e+008 ms (22.43/9.899/15.55)
[WORKER0] share found: 4842003 <-> 10828914 #894 (434396) @ 1399026204
12:23:33[WORKER | 1] share found: 29758071 <-> 12186142 #895 (435240) @
154641
 c/m | 9.54 sh/m | VL: 885 (98.99%) | RJ: 9 (1.01%) | ST: 0 (0.00%) | A
e+008 ms (22.43/9.899/15.55)
[WORKER1] share found: 4620972 <-> 45861533 #896 (435504) @ 1399026218
[MASTER] @ 12:23:42 | work received | sharetarget 0x0080000000000000000
000000000000000000000000000000000000
12:23:43 | 4636 c/m | 9.534 sh/m | VL: 887 (99.00%) | RJ: 9 (1.00%) | S
0%) | ART: 4.076e+008 ms (22.43/9.899/15.55)


I get the same
donate BTC: 184qt6xvfhgyQnDCZvaAjPN3WtzudEs7Uz
donate ORB: oY6daworbXQNrn2ydgQPTVGtQ5Q3xWhQzg

Offline Ykw

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 88
    • View Profile
Re: fast AMD OpenCL PTS/NRS miner released
« Reply #824 on: May 02, 2014, 10:28:13 am »
[MASTER] @ 12:23:14 | work received | sharetarget 0x0080000000000000000
000000000000000000000000000000000000
[WORKER1] share found: 20754872 <-> 18110106 #892 (433718) @ 1399026195
[WORKER1] share found: 39356499 <-> 24461962 #893 (433966) @ 1399026198
12:23:23 | 4636 c/m | 9.536 sh/m | VL: 884 (98.99%) | RJ: 9 (1.01%) | S
0%) | ART: 4.076e+008 ms (22.43/9.899/15.55)
[WORKER0] share found: 4842003 <-> 10828914 #894 (434396) @ 1399026204
12:23:33[WORKER | 1] share found: 29758071 <-> 12186142 #895 (435240) @
154641
 c/m | 9.54 sh/m | VL: 885 (98.99%) | RJ: 9 (1.01%) | ST: 0 (0.00%) | A
e+008 ms (22.43/9.899/15.55)
[WORKER1] share found: 4620972 <-> 45861533 #896 (435504) @ 1399026218
[MASTER] @ 12:23:42 | work received | sharetarget 0x0080000000000000000
000000000000000000000000000000000000
12:23:43 | 4636 c/m | 9.534 sh/m | VL: 887 (99.00%) | RJ: 9 (1.00%) | S
0%) | ART: 4.076e+008 ms (22.43/9.899/15.55)

I get the same

your board+CPU+RAM(and clocks)... plus gpu clocks...

It normally does not have to do with this.. you might have found the same problem I have... let's check.