Please reconsider your decision. thul is emotional now. We should think about it rationally.
What means rationally ?Only accepting your point of view?
Also the claim i attack bitcrab personly is false.
I am questioning his actions being less effectiv than other possibilities where he doesn't accept any other point of view than his own.
What names have i been called when warning about OMO fund being used in a wrong time and decreasing CR to under 2 against community consensus ?
Bitcrab using the OMO fund to buy his own debt out at highest possible price also opened a big door questioning his action.
What names have i been called when instantly saying BSIP42 as it was will be a disaster as margin call walls will be created ?
And saying now the lowering of MCR in a downtrend makes no sense is offensive since its against his agenda ?
Increase of price feed to kill the last possibile arbitrage is also ok for you ?
So once somebodies CR goes under 1.75 he needs to pray it will be no bigger downfall as it could lead to a total loss of his investment when he will be held hostage with his low CR as no margin calls will be eaten to push back his CR and lower risk of a total loss ?
Also making somebody accountable for his past actions is being emotional ?Or is it to prevent similar situations in the future?
You guys are very loud now but where were you when bitcny was near GS or tons of ex investors spitting blood because of their total loss ?
Bitshares has a clear leak of governance and it needs members who do their own research and have the guts to talk about these in public.
You claim its rational to spend 2 million BTS for 2 exchanges which have
no real volume based on the worker bitcrab opened?What value does it bring to bitshares?
If you think that these questions are emotional rather than rational or that i ask them just because of bitcrab than you are wrong.
And if you think anybody can stop me from expressing my point of view or holding people accountable for their actions than i have to tell you again you are wrong.
I did it before being a proxy and i will keep doing it also when being not a proxy anymore.
But instead of attacking and trying to discredit me you should ask alt directly to join cn-vote
不知道为啥alt要把自己的票代理给Thul3这个傻逼,代理给cn-vote也好得多啊。
At least be honest why the attack.
And just as a side note there are many big proxies questioning bitcrabs motivation but just being silent.
BEOS even not hiding they don't like bitcrab.
I voted
for bitcrab as committee and witness before he misused the votes of ZB ( my personal opinion) which made that i revoked my votes so he won't have an advantage by using zb's votes for his own benefit against the rest of the community.
So claiming i'm in a personal vendetta against bitcrab is just false and a lie.
These are rational decissions based for the good of bitshares and my ethical view for the
whole community.
Am going to reply on this one too
1.反对降低爆仓惩罚
2.反对调低最低抵押率
3.反对见证人喂真实价格
4.反对bitcny上交易所交易对
5.反对交易所参与社区治理和成为见证人
6.反对市值管理
I use google translator so i hope i understood these correctly
1.If you mean being against lowering MSSR of bitcny to 1.01 yes because it takes the possibility away to arbitrage margin calls
and release risk
2.Wrong i'm not against a reduce of MCR but i'm against a reduce in a downtrend.A decrease of MCR has its biggest effect at bottom or clear reversal signal
3.Thats your definition of real price feed.
4.I don't oppose.But adding bitcny to exchanges which have
zero real volume what benefit will it bring to bitcny ?
Instead of wasting funds for scam exchanges with 99.5% fake volume it would make more sense to work on exchanges with real volume also when it means to go the longer route including legal letters.
Also thinking that any legit exchange will add liquidity for bitcny without providing a massiv amount of bitcny to that exchange for market making is just being naive.You would need first to create a fund to create these bitassets are sell a big amount of BTS to provide these bitassets to that exchange.
Thinking that an exchange opens your trading pair and it brings from itself liquidity is naive.
5.Yes i'm against it
but accepted the other points of view as it was said they will make decissions based on the good for bitshares.What i don't accept is misusing these votes for the benefit of a single persons benefit.
6.Please clarify