« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Blacklisting requires LTM (lifetime membership), should this be necessary?  (Read 3026 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

May 18, 2019, 04:56:54 pm Reply #4

Offline iamredbar

Re: Blacklisting requires LTM (lifetime membership), should this be necessary?
Quote from: xeroc on May 18, 2019, 10:39:35 am
No idea what made the original devs require ltm for this. But it makes sense if you consider whitelisting a 'premium' service

If that’s the case, then it does make sense.
Logged
May 18, 2019, 10:39:35 am Reply #3

Offline xeroc

  • Board Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12922
  • ChainSquad GmbH
    • View Profile
    • ChainSquad GmbH
  • BitShares: xeroc
  • GitHub: xeroc
Re: Blacklisting requires LTM (lifetime membership), should this be necessary?
No idea what made the original devs require ltm for this. But it makes sense if you consider whitelisting a 'premium' service
Logged
March 17, 2019, 01:53:18 pm Reply #2

Offline iamredbar

Re: Blacklisting requires LTM (lifetime membership), should this be necessary?
Bump. Anyone have any input? Or am I talking to a wall?
Logged
March 12, 2019, 04:10:36 pm Reply #1

Offline iamredbar

Blacklisting requires LTM (lifetime membership), should this be necessary?
I just realized that an account needs to be a LTM to use the blacklisting function.

Is there a reason for this? Should this be necessary? I am only asking because I do not know. If there is a solid reason, I am cool with that. But if there is not, maybe we should reconsider this choice.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
 

Page created in 0.192 seconds with 23 queries.