Author Topic: Proxy:B-DEX  (Read 6805 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline vianull

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 91
    • View Profile
    • bts.ai
  • BitShares: vianull
Re: Proxy:B-DEX
« Reply #15 on: July 04, 2019, 05:20:42 pm »
 Coinegg's weight has been removed.  Thanks for reminding , and we will pay more attention on price feeding.
We are bts.ai  team
Witness:  witness.hiblockchain
Standby Committee: btsai

Offline BTSMoon

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 91
    • View Profile
Re: Proxy:B-DEX
« Reply #16 on: July 15, 2019, 06:25:48 am »
Please Unvote 9 Witnesses that have No Feed Global Protection for BitUSD.

liondani, verbaltech2, delegate-1.lafona, xn-delegate, abc123, xman, fox, roelandp, in.abit

https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=28662.msg332430;topicseen#msg332430

Offline Thul3

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 574
    • View Profile
Re: Proxy:B-DEX
« Reply #17 on: July 16, 2019, 12:22:23 pm »
I downvoted early today bitspark as committee when reading the past days his reckless opinion.
We had just an argument that he would let the GS on USD happen and that he thinks we shouldn't defend the bad debt holders as it's their own fault.

I got mad because the GS Protection was voted in to give borrowers a safer feeling of taking debt and also because i don't want to lose a part of the community again.

It seems they give a fuck about community members getting rekt should a GS happen.
They talk random shit but not how to grow the community.

I will open a new Thread about it soon so people can watch themself what kind of argumention they have.

I really feel upset because they give crap about other peoples money and their ignorance and ideology argumentation boils your blood

Offline Ammar Yousef (ioBanker)

Re: Proxy:B-DEX
« Reply #18 on: July 21, 2019, 09:27:16 pm »
I wish you the best luck, such a dynamic authority and control would always be the most important positive player within the bitshares network.
Be part of the change and set bitshares-vision as your proxy!
Committee account: iobanker-core
Ammar Yousef - CEO @ ioBanker OÜ

Offline biophil

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 880
  • Professor of Computer Science
    • View Profile
    • My Academic Website
  • BitShares: biophil
Re: Proxy:B-DEX
« Reply #19 on: July 23, 2019, 08:48:22 pm »
I downvoted early today bitspark as committee when reading the past days his reckless opinion.
We had just an argument that he would let the GS on USD happen and that he thinks we shouldn't defend the bad debt holders as it's their own fault.

I got mad because the GS Protection was voted in to give borrowers a safer feeling of taking debt and also because i don't want to lose a part of the community again.

Understanding and implementing undercollateralization protection in a way that does not involve GS will be one of the main focuses of my university research project. Obviously there are a lot of difficult tradeoffs to consider (liquidity versus accurate pegging versus strict collateral requirements) and my goal with the project is to take a comprehensive view of the problem and develop a framework that lets us optimize the tradeoffs. Would you consider supporting with your vote for worker 1.14.204?
Support our research efforts to improve BitAsset price-pegging! Vote for worker 1.14.204 "201907-uccs-research-project."

Offline Thul3

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 574
    • View Profile
Re: Proxy:B-DEX
« Reply #20 on: September 10, 2019, 10:36:52 pm »
Upvoted today  Bitshares UI worker
 
I upvoted Bitshares UI worker for 7 days so there will be enough funds to release the new updated UI.
The updated UI is urgently needed since it also contains the fix for market fee claim error and more important the cookie session for the refferal system which is a major point for any refferal offer.
 

« Last Edit: September 10, 2019, 10:41:20 pm by Thul3 »

Offline xeroc

  • Board Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12915
  • ChainSquad GmbH
    • View Profile
    • ChainSquad GmbH
  • BitShares: xeroc
  • GitHub: xeroc
Re: Proxy:B-DEX
« Reply #21 on: September 11, 2019, 12:36:57 pm »
Upvoted today  Bitshares UI worker
 
I upvoted Bitshares UI worker for 7 days so there will be enough funds to release the new updated UI.
The updated UI is urgently needed since it also contains the fix for market fee claim error and more important the cookie session for the refferal system which is a major point for any refferal offer.
+5%
Give BitShares a try! Use the http://testnet.bitshares.eu provided by http://bitshares.eu powered by ChainSquad GmbH

Offline Thul3

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 574
    • View Profile
Re: Proxy:B-DEX
« Reply #22 on: September 29, 2019, 04:05:52 pm »
I unvoted the refund400k worker as it got to strong putting important and urgent workers inactive.
Decentralized got already majority of its funding so it would be a waste of closing that funding to limit the effectiveness on the conference

Dexbot arbitrage feature between DEX - CEX .Urgently waiting for that feature to start promotion to get major asset liquidity on DEX


Also to prevent the closing of exotic infrastructur end of october should there be no funding


BSIP76 voted active again
« Last Edit: September 29, 2019, 04:11:46 pm by Thul3 »

Offline Bangzi

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 321
    • View Profile
    • Steemit: Bangzi
  • BitShares: bangzi
Re: Proxy:B-DEX
« Reply #23 on: October 31, 2019, 01:41:23 am »
Can you approve Committee-account Proposal: 1.10.50903 to Create a new Worker "BAIP-Threshold"? Is one of the criteria to pass a BAIP(BitAssets Improvement Proposal)

https://github.com/bitshares/baips/blob/master/baip-0001.md
Bitshares DEX - Over 1000 Coins, Buy, Sell, Transfer & List Any Coins |Free Signup Today: https://wallet.bitshares.org/?r=bangzi

Offline Thul3

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 574
    • View Profile
Re: Proxy:B-DEX
« Reply #24 on: December 12, 2019, 10:59:20 am »
In 14 days from today i will start removing my votes from inactive committee members .
Committee should be activly discussing to be productive instead of being a dead place.





Online sschiessl

Re: Proxy:B-DEX
« Reply #25 on: December 18, 2019, 08:24:45 am »
clockwork has been voted out as a witness, while he is one of the most active ones and there are other candidates that do not provide a public node, or otherwise engage publicly in the community. Committee the same, holding the last spot at the moment.

Is that action something you are willing to comment on? Since you and alt both voted him down the same time, I assume there is a reason.
« Last Edit: December 18, 2019, 08:27:31 am by sschiessl »

Offline xeroc

  • Board Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12915
  • ChainSquad GmbH
    • View Profile
    • ChainSquad GmbH
  • BitShares: xeroc
  • GitHub: xeroc
Re: Proxy:B-DEX
« Reply #26 on: December 18, 2019, 10:28:14 am »
In 2 weeks time, don't be surprised when Alex turns around and does other stuff.
Give BitShares a try! Use the http://testnet.bitshares.eu provided by http://bitshares.eu powered by ChainSquad GmbH

Offline clockwork

  • Committee member
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 376
    • View Profile
  • BitShares: clockwork
Re: Proxy:B-DEX
« Reply #27 on: December 19, 2019, 06:09:52 am »
chill everyone.

I believe it was just a mistake/misunderstanding. Votes have been reinstated.

Online sschiessl

Re: Proxy:B-DEX
« Reply #28 on: December 19, 2019, 11:04:26 am »
chill everyone.

I believe it was just a mistake/misunderstanding. Votes have been reinstated.

Apparently several have been voted out by voting changes done by you and baozi. I noticed votes are still in for bit.professor, who has explicitly stepped down from committee and even announced leaving the BTS community for good several weeks ago. If you are willing to, please comment on your reasoning for current committee votes.

Offline Thul3

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 574
    • View Profile
Re: Proxy:B-DEX
« Reply #29 on: April 05, 2020, 09:12:19 pm »
Removed my support from Abit as committee.
He changed the last months dramaticly to no work ethics.

He has no problems with bribes,inside deals,support scam workers (which he admited on tg) and voting not based on how supportive someone is for bitshares but how quite a witness is on scams like the scam exchange.


Here his talk about deciding why a witness should be voted in or out

Quote
dima was spreading hates in the groups, while lafona kept silence. so actually I'd rather vote for lafona

No mention who is better wittness or bigger supporter to bitshares.


Turning more and more into a disgusting politcal war.

Seems he haven't learned anything losing tens of millions of BTS by following some people blindly with no ethics to rules and consensus.


I agree he is one of bitshares most active member but his work ethics changed so dramaticly the last couple of months that i can't support it anymore till it changes to normal again where he accepts that bitshares is being run as a decentralized community and not by a few people who do inside deals and talking in secret thinking noone sees it and working mainly for their own profit.


On a side note as some people threatened me already in the past to remove support if i won't change my mind.
I'm a proxy and committee to do best for bitshares and bitshares only.
No Beos no cn-vote no others.

I support EVERYONE when i see a clear benefit for bitshares.
I have no problem losing my proxy or committee for adressing these clear issues which gets month by month bigger on bitshares and the western community massivly demanding a fork because of all these bad actions like inside deals,voting inactive committee members,voting for non supportive witnesses and kicking big supporters out.Ugly politics mainly done by some chinese and beos,no participation of community in important queries (just inside deals in closed groups) etc....

I always fought for the best of bitshares which is a decentralized project but its turning more and more into a centralized shit show where a few started to dictate everything in secret groups and beos supporting every crap and scam in hope to get a favour vote back by these people for funding their beos crap to bitshares.


That's not the bitshares i support and that's also not what cn-vote said it will support.

Remember  ?CN-Vote was against dilution,against inside deals,against ineffective workers and saying clearly being a witness/committee is a privilage for bitshares supporters ONLY



I always vote what is best for bitshares no matter what opinion on other topics someone has or what group/nation someone belongs.


Quote
so vote buyng is fine?

Quote
if the outcome is positive, it's fine for me.


Discussion between another Dev and Abit about paying 2 times for the same audit on the core prelude worker
$75/h to abit and later for the same work 3% of all funding to bbf

Of course no vote buying with reserve pool ?

There is way way more where he is justifying bad actions.These two are just from today
« Last Edit: April 06, 2020, 12:57:41 am by Thul3 »