From the poll result it should be 1%

There were 81% voting for change.

When you consider the weighted average its 1.46 (assuming >3 means 4).

When you consider weighted average of the super majority voting other than zero; its 1.81

If you consider those who voted > 3 as potentially seeking more than 4: Then 2 is quite plausibly the weighted sentiment.

It was a non anon poll as we certainly consider weight of opinion; so there is also that.

Also, considered heavily was technical analysis of daily candles in python simulation for Average True Range Percent (ATRP)(ATR%). You can plot BTSUSD binance ATR at tradingview and ATRP if you have an account there.

https://www.tradingview.com/symbols/BTSUSD/?exchange=BINANCEhttps://www.investopedia.com/terms/a/atr.asphttps://www.fidelity.com/learning-center/trading-investing/technical-analysis/technical-indicator-guide/atrpThe aim is to achieve desired effects of allowing the red shorter to avoid the blue force settler in pursuit of the "ten day trending outlook" at green. Admittedly, no matter how you spin it, there is a degree of shoot from the hip in any arrangement involving fine tuning of an MPA's parameters. 2% seems like a solid compromise after a few days of reviewing relevant data.

You'll note I initially voted 0% in the poll myself. I have been swayed both through other's rhetoric, thoughtful consideration of data, and ongoing contemplation of game theory.