Author Topic: added MXC Exchange to awesome-bitshares readme  (Read 202 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline kenCode

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2283
    • View Profile
    • Agorise
kenCode - Decentraliser @ Agorise
Matrix/Keybase/Hive/Commun/Github: @Agorise
www.PalmPay.chat

Offline abit

  • Committee member
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 4341
    • View Profile
    • Abit's Hive Blog
  • BitShares: abit
  • GitHub: abitmore
Re: added MXC Exchange to awesome-bitshares readme
« Reply #1 on: July 12, 2020, 03:41:23 pm »
The pull request has been closed since we don't add centralized exchanges so far.

Created a new issue for discussion: https://github.com/bitshares/awesome-bitshares/issues/39
BTS account: abit
BTS committee member: abit
BTS witness: in.abit

Offline kenCode

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2283
    • View Profile
    • Agorise
Re: added MXC Exchange to awesome-bitshares readme
« Reply #2 on: July 12, 2020, 04:22:29 pm »
The other exchanges that are in that list are also centralised. They support one or more BTS tokens, but they are also not DEX's in and of themselves. So, that is why I added MXC, WALLDEX, XBTS, etc. I am not sure what you disagree with...
kenCode - Decentraliser @ Agorise
Matrix/Keybase/Hive/Commun/Github: @Agorise
www.PalmPay.chat

Offline abit

  • Committee member
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 4341
    • View Profile
    • Abit's Hive Blog
  • BitShares: abit
  • GitHub: abitmore
Re: added MXC Exchange to awesome-bitshares readme
« Reply #3 on: July 15, 2020, 01:56:21 am »
The other exchanges that are in that list are also centralised. They support one or more BTS tokens, but they are also not DEX's in and of themselves. So, that is why I added MXC, WALLDEX, XBTS, etc. I am not sure what you disagree with...

I'm surprised that you didn't see the differences.

They are different types of "partnerships" to BitShares.

With XBTS, WALLDEX and etc, the users' major activities are on the BitShares blockchain.

With MXC and etc, the users' major activities are off-chain.

Actually, since we have bridges on awesome-bitshares, it's fair to add the centralized exchanges as well, as a new section. But it's not appropriate to mix them together, IMHO.
BTS account: abit
BTS committee member: abit
BTS witness: in.abit