It will fix itself with the buzz and advent of new DACs. I think that's your point, as well as Daniels
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
In the last 48hrs I've spoken with a DAC development team lead who apparently approached invictus about developing their ecosystem on the AGS/PTS platform, but Invictus told them if they wanted to have a stake before they announce and develop their first platform they should "buy some while they're cheap"
This was weeks ago when the price was quite a bit higher. Point is, there is no reason to jump into this ecosystem if you have no stake in it. Invictus sucked up all the funds intended for investing and incentivizing development of the community and now is the boot standing on the neck of DAC development.
How exactly do you think "Buzz" happens? Because there is good news and things are in development. I don't understand why it makes sense to sit on 300,000PTS and over a thousand BTC if the plan is to not spend it incentivizing other people into the space. Invictus said "AGS Funds will never be taken as profit" but they ARE using them to pay for salaries and general operating costs at invictus, so while it may not be "profit" they are PAYING THEMSELVES using these funds and not using them to incentivize other developers getting into their ecosystem, which was much of the intent of the fund if I recall correctly.
A bounty literally is saying "IF someone does this thing we want done, to the specifications we require we guarantee to pay whoever does it this fixed amount" So it's not like they're just throwing money around, they ONLY pay for results in this scenario.
I'm getting tired of saying the same obvious things. I have been very patient but that is ending.