Main > 中文 (Chinese)
论比特股复兴之路
ebit:
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=33976.msg350370;topicseen#msg350370 这里面列的第三步是研究怎样在社区里建立捐助机制。大家一起捐钱给开发者，激励他们工作。
EOS里有这样的系统，不知道能不能对接上BTS。
前天看SWAPBTS，里面有捐款页面，竟然没有一个人捐款。如果捐款有空投预期，或许会有人响应。
不知道abit有没有收到过捐款，反正我没捐过。
主要觉得他有钱，不在乎几毛钱的捐款。
其次，也许他厌恶捐款呢？
如果开发者喜欢被捐款，那就让捐款机制更科学。
ebit:
以github上的维护小组，为雏形，成立“比特股发币委员会”，围绕开发的各种新功能，发行各种新币。
各种新功能，各种新币，生态壮大后，发行银行资产背书的稳定币（白条）。
白条稳定币规模足够大后，再尝试算法稳定币。
这个顺序，好像才是健康的。打乱这个顺序，就是拔苗助长。
天籁:
You are right, I really mean bitassets - the committee owned and branded smartcoins. Thank you!
--- Quote from: R on January 11, 2024, 04:58:23 pm ---
--- Quote from: 天籁 on January 06, 2024, 05:59:07 am ---2021年之后，市场调整期间，比特股社区也做过几次智能币规则的修改尝试，试图恢复智能币的信誉，完善承兑功能。典型的一次短暂而彻底失败的尝试即所谓的负反馈精准锚定。第二次试验就是现在还在采用的方案，废弃锁死最低喂价，恢复最初的喂价方法，把黑天鹅全局清算改为最低抵押率清算，此时BitUSD市场早已全局清算，仅仅能维持BitCNY市场的半死状态，和死了也差不多。
记得就在前几年，比特股创始人BM离开比特股多年之后，又回访过一次比特股论坛，只提了一个问题，询问比特股当时的喂价方案，之后就没有再出现过。我猜想，他肯定是没有得到满意的答案，当然既然他提出这个问题，那就是说他也没有想到和发现满意的答案。再就是如果他找到了满意的答案，他有可能想在EOS上做个抵押锚定币方面的项目。
--- End quote ---
You talk about smartcoins, but you really mean bitassets - the committee owned and branded smartcoins.
Anyone can create their own privatized bitasset, free from outside influence, free from past bitshares prices, and many people have; see "honest.cny", "hertz", "hero", and the norns like "urthr" "skuld", and "verthandi" for example.
Some of these privatized smartcoins have good operational records with marketing being the limiting factor. You can create these to reference any asset as long as you have price feed scripts for them, with your own smartcoin config & black swan recovery methods set, no need for secondary chains to try out new smartcoin ideas (other than the test network).
The competitors to smartcoins don't seem to transparently demonstrate sufficient backing collateral, so no wonder competing with them is tough when they're effectively just passing off user issued assets on other chains with no proof/withdrawal mechanisms as the real deal.
You bring up a lack of innovation, but you haven't mentioned the liquidity pools, the reference UI spotlight features, suez order sends order mechanics, the expansion of "black swan recovery methods" for improving smartcoin development, NFT apps/galleries, Airdrop tech, the introduction of credit offer lending on chain neither?
You bring up death & failure, yet the blockchain blocks reliably continue to be produced every 3 seconds regardless of bizarre CEX behaviour. Good riddance to Binance, their platform brought centralization and downwards price action.
I'd note that the clone coin you mention didn't to a proper genesis so isn't a true fork & has an mcap 40x smaller than BTS as of this post, not a good look. They even modified their core to be fully centralized, banning accounts from the chain: https://github.com/bitshares-cnvote/newbitshares-core/blob/29c316e376f1a0925537b2e6dd0bf226c0df99bf/libraries/chain/evaluator.cpp#L81
I'd probably say encouraging new gateways to open up, and/or encouraging existing gateways to support new tokens should be on the road to revival, back when BTS was top 10 there were more than we have now. That and more UI development.
--- End quote ---
R:
--- Quote from: 天籁 on January 06, 2024, 05:59:07 am ---2021年之后，市场调整期间，比特股社区也做过几次智能币规则的修改尝试，试图恢复智能币的信誉，完善承兑功能。典型的一次短暂而彻底失败的尝试即所谓的负反馈精准锚定。第二次试验就是现在还在采用的方案，废弃锁死最低喂价，恢复最初的喂价方法，把黑天鹅全局清算改为最低抵押率清算，此时BitUSD市场早已全局清算，仅仅能维持BitCNY市场的半死状态，和死了也差不多。
记得就在前几年，比特股创始人BM离开比特股多年之后，又回访过一次比特股论坛，只提了一个问题，询问比特股当时的喂价方案，之后就没有再出现过。我猜想，他肯定是没有得到满意的答案，当然既然他提出这个问题，那就是说他也没有想到和发现满意的答案。再就是如果他找到了满意的答案，他有可能想在EOS上做个抵押锚定币方面的项目。
--- End quote ---
You talk about smartcoins, but you really mean bitassets - the committee owned and branded smartcoins.
Anyone can create their own privatized bitasset, free from outside influence, free from past bitshares prices, and many people have; see "honest.cny", "hertz", "hero", and the norns like "urthr" "skuld", and "verthandi" for example.
Some of these privatized smartcoins have good operational records with marketing being the limiting factor. You can create these to reference any asset as long as you have price feed scripts for them, with your own smartcoin config & black swan recovery methods set, no need for secondary chains to try out new smartcoin ideas (other than the test network).
The competitors to smartcoins don't seem to transparently demonstrate sufficient backing collateral, so no wonder competing with them is tough when they're effectively just passing off user issued assets on other chains with no proof/withdrawal mechanisms as the real deal.
You bring up a lack of innovation, but you haven't mentioned the liquidity pools, the reference UI spotlight features, suez order sends order mechanics, the expansion of "black swan recovery methods" for improving smartcoin development, NFT apps/galleries, Airdrop tech, the introduction of credit offer lending on chain neither?
You bring up death & failure, yet the blockchain blocks reliably continue to be produced every 3 seconds regardless of bizarre CEX behaviour. Good riddance to Binance, their platform brought centralization and downwards price action.
I'd note that the clone coin you mention didn't to a proper genesis so isn't a true fork & has an mcap 40x smaller than BTS as of this post, not a good look. They even modified their core to be fully centralized, banning accounts from the chain: https://github.com/bitshares-cnvote/newbitshares-core/blob/29c316e376f1a0925537b2e6dd0bf226c0df99bf/libraries/chain/evaluator.cpp#L81
I'd probably say encouraging new gateways to open up, and/or encouraging existing gateways to support new tokens should be on the road to revival, back when BTS was top 10 there were more than we have now. That and more UI development.
天籁:
停更几天，请移步二楼，看修改润色后的论文。
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version