Main > Stakeholder Proposals

Preserving initial delegate name

(1/3) > >>

bytemaster:

--- Quote from: emski on June 14, 2014, 08:25:26 pm ---
--- Quote from: bytemaster on June 14, 2014, 02:18:14 pm ---init-delegate-1 was the first to be voted out :)

--- End quote ---
votes on the test network doesnt matter anyway. Arent the initial votes predefined by you ?

--- End quote ---

They are defined by who ever launches the DAC.

emski:

--- Quote from: bytemaster on June 14, 2014, 02:18:14 pm ---init-delegate-1 was the first to be voted out :)

--- End quote ---
votes on the test network doesnt matter anyway. Arent the initial votes predefined by you ?

bytemaster:
init-delegate-1 was the first to be voted out :)

emski:
nope, I think you are first.
I've seen people using "vote for X" but you are the first to use "vote for X instead Y, because X is horrible".
I'll try not to be that lazy and come up with better name.

Troglodactyl:

--- Quote from: emski on June 13, 2014, 03:07:35 pm ---init-delegate-1 seems like a rather good name.
I was wondering If I should use it.

--- End quote ---

init-delegate-1 is a horrible name.  Vote for init-delegate-62, init-delegate-63, init-delegate-64, and init-delegate-65 instead. ;)

...Do I get the dubious honor of first DPOS delegate smear campaign, or did someone beat me to it?

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page