Shall we rename "XT" to "X" once it is upgraded to avoid confusion?

[yellowecho]

I think the "T" was to help distinguish the MVP from the final product; however, I don't think most people followed development closely enough to know the difference.  Simply calling it "X" with the understanding that the chain will be upgraded to include everything is a much better approach IMO.

[ripplexiaoshan]

For sure, if the test is good, why we keep the "T".

[ebit]

The" initial allocation" how to turn  "final allocation"?
I think it is should be voted by bitsharesX.

[dcchong]

why are you shouting like this .. and more importantly .. what do you want to tell us with this? what lines? why complex? what is complex?

Sorry for my poor english, just forget it.

I mean, renaming "XT" to "X" is good.

"Would this add or remove confusion?"  This remove my confusion, thanks a lot.

 

[dcchong]

why are you shouting like this .. and more importantly .. what do you want to tell us with this? what lines? why complex? what is complex?

Sorry for my poor english, just forget it.

[dcchong]

 

[ebit]

If this is true ,I think it is good.

[xeroc]

why are you shouting like this .. and more importantly .. what do you want to tell us with this? what lines? why complex? what is complex?

[dcchong]

YES      One problem, our product lines ars complex to others...

[cygnify]

Yes.

[vlight]

DISCLAIMER: Actual order of DAC creation may vary, with the exception of BitShares XT, which will be the first to launch, and which will convert into BitShares X once the testing phase is over.

ngl, i always thought that BitShares XT will be renamed to BitShares X after the testing phase is over. Then what exactly do you mean "which will convert into BitShares X once the testing phase is over." ?

[emski]

Why not naming it something meaningful for everyone and using that (full) name everywhere until people start using abbreviation(s)?

Bitshares Base ?

[vlight]

Would this add or remove confusion?

add

[emski]

Why not naming it something meaningful for everyone and using that (full) name everywhere until people start using abbreviation(s)?

[liondani]

Or drop the T right away and announce ‘We have decided to remove All assets, this is it enjoy’ , this will serve better my new plans 

lol

[tonyk]

Or drop the T right away and announce ‘We have decided to remove All assets, this is it enjoy’ , this will serve better my new plans 

[liondani]

A big YES !!!!

[xeroc]

Oh yhea ..
 

But make it more obvious and make clear its NOT a TEST! Unless you want to manipule market for cheap BTSX

[toast]

Seems like people like having one "main" chain. Once XT is upgraded we can call it "BitShares X" for everyone to be able to rally around, since having a family of chains called "bitshares X" is apparently too abstract to handle. This one will have a small number of BitAssets and also normal user-issued assets.

Of course there will still be a family of chains as was always the plan, and I guess we can call it "The BTS X family". "BitShares X" won't trade altcoins or fiat (besides USD), those will be "XC" "XF", etc. All snapshots from bitshares X with 100% initial allocation.

Would this add or remove confusion?