Author Topic: Shall we rename "XT" to "X" once it is upgraded to avoid confusion?  (Read 3468 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline yellowecho

I think the "T" was to help distinguish the MVP from the final product; however, I don't think most people followed development closely enough to know the difference.  Simply calling it "X" with the understanding that the chain will be upgraded to include everything is a much better approach IMO.
696c6f766562726f776e696573

Offline ripplexiaoshan

  • Board Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2300
    • View Profile
  • BitShares: jademont
For sure, if the test is good, why we keep the "T".
BTS committee member:jademont

Offline ebit

  • Committee member
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1873
    • View Profile
  • BitShares: ebit
The" initial allocation" how to turn  "final allocation"?
I think it is should be voted by bitsharesX.
telegram:ebit521
https://weibo.com/ebiter

Offline dcchong

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 203
    • View Profile
why are you shouting like this .. and more importantly .. what do you want to tell us with this? what lines? why complex? what is complex?

Sorry for my poor english, just forget it.

I mean, renaming "XT" to "X" is good.

"Would this add or remove confusion?"  This remove my confusion, thanks a lot.

 +5% +5% +5% +5%
wallet_approve_delegate dc-delegate true
wallet_approve_delegate bitsharesx-delegate true

Offline dcchong

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 203
    • View Profile
why are you shouting like this .. and more importantly .. what do you want to tell us with this? what lines? why complex? what is complex?

Sorry for my poor english, just forget it.
wallet_approve_delegate dc-delegate true
wallet_approve_delegate bitsharesx-delegate true

Offline dcchong

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 203
    • View Profile
wallet_approve_delegate dc-delegate true
wallet_approve_delegate bitsharesx-delegate true

Offline ebit

  • Committee member
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1873
    • View Profile
  • BitShares: ebit
telegram:ebit521
https://weibo.com/ebiter

Offline xeroc

  • Board Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12922
  • ChainSquad GmbH
    • View Profile
    • ChainSquad GmbH
  • BitShares: xeroc
  • GitHub: xeroc
why are you shouting like this .. and more importantly .. what do you want to tell us with this? what lines? why complex? what is complex?

Offline dcchong

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 203
    • View Profile
YES  +5%    One problem, our product lines ars complex to others...
wallet_approve_delegate dc-delegate true
wallet_approve_delegate bitsharesx-delegate true


Offline vlight

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 275
    • View Profile
  • BitShares: vlight
Quote
DISCLAIMER: Actual order of DAC creation may vary, with the exception of BitShares XT, which will be the first to launch, and which will convert into BitShares X once the testing phase is over.

ngl, i always thought that BitShares XT will be renamed to BitShares X after the testing phase is over. Then what exactly do you mean "which will convert into BitShares X once the testing phase is over." ?

Offline emski

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1282
    • View Profile
    • http://lnkd.in/nPbhxG
Why not naming it something meaningful for everyone and using that (full) name everywhere until people start using abbreviation(s)?

Bitshares Base ?


Offline emski

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1282
    • View Profile
    • http://lnkd.in/nPbhxG
Why not naming it something meaningful for everyone and using that (full) name everywhere until people start using abbreviation(s)?

Offline liondani

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3737
  • Inch by inch, play by play
    • View Profile
    • My detailed info
  • BitShares: liondani
  • GitHub: liondani
Or drop the T right away and announce ‘We have decided to remove All assets, this is it enjoy’ , this will serve better my new plans  :)

lol