Author Topic: GetWork Miner 130 HPM on 3.4Ghz i7 3x faster than coyote pool miner  (Read 25232 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline bytemaster

Re: GetWork Miner 120 HPM on 3.4Ghz i7 3x faster than coyote pool miner
« Reply #30 on: November 13, 2013, 08:04:59 pm »
I am getting 42 HPM on a Quad DO machine.   

For the latest updates checkout my blog: http://bytemaster.bitshares.org
Anything said on these forums does not constitute an intent to create a legal obligation or contract between myself and anyone else.   These are merely my opinions and I reserve the right to change them at any time.

Offline cybe

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 8
    • View Profile
Re: GetWork Miner 120 HPM on 3.4Ghz i7 3x faster than coyote pool miner
« Reply #31 on: November 13, 2013, 08:06:40 pm »
on a AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 4171 HE (8 cores)

Code: [Select]
Usage: ./gw_miner HOST USER PASS
Performing Benchmark...
 13.0319 hpm
 24.5904 hpm
 17.8479 hpm
 18.6269 hpm
 19.0899 hpm
 22.6576 hpm
 25.2702 hpm
 32.2715 hpm
 35.5816 hpm
 34.2171 hpm
 33.1173 hpm
 33.8781 hpm
 34.5473 hpm
 36.5886 hpm
 36.9985 hpm
 34.7708 hpm
 35.222 hpm
 35.6342 hpm
 35.9993 hpm

Offline bytemaster

For the latest updates checkout my blog: http://bytemaster.bitshares.org
Anything said on these forums does not constitute an intent to create a legal obligation or contract between myself and anyone else.   These are merely my opinions and I reserve the right to change them at any time.

Offline bytemaster

Re: GetWork Miner 120 HPM on 3.4Ghz i7 3x faster than coyote pool miner
« Reply #33 on: November 13, 2013, 08:08:22 pm »
on a AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 4171 HE (8 cores)

Code: [Select]
Usage: ./gw_miner HOST USER PASS
Performing Benchmark...
 13.0319 hpm
 24.5904 hpm
 17.8479 hpm
 18.6269 hpm
 19.0899 hpm
 22.6576 hpm
 25.2702 hpm
 32.2715 hpm
 35.5816 hpm
 34.2171 hpm
 33.1173 hpm
 33.8781 hpm
 34.5473 hpm
 36.5886 hpm
 36.9985 hpm
 34.7708 hpm
 35.222 hpm
 35.6342 hpm
 35.9993 hpm

You have to let it run longer than that for an accurate measure because not all seeds produce the same number of results.   Let it finish the benchmark to get an accurate comparison.  Those are cumulative averages, not independent samples.
For the latest updates checkout my blog: http://bytemaster.bitshares.org
Anything said on these forums does not constitute an intent to create a legal obligation or contract between myself and anyone else.   These are merely my opinions and I reserve the right to change them at any time.

Offline bytemaster

For the latest updates checkout my blog: http://bytemaster.bitshares.org
Anything said on these forums does not constitute an intent to create a legal obligation or contract between myself and anyone else.   These are merely my opinions and I reserve the right to change them at any time.

Offline crendore

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 48
    • View Profile
Re: GetWork Miner 120 HPM on 3.4Ghz i7 3x faster than coyote pool miner
« Reply #35 on: November 13, 2013, 08:11:22 pm »
I get this when compiling on 10.9:
Quote
warning: unknown warning option '-Wno-unused-local-typedefs' [-Wunknown-warning-option]
/Users/deweydb/Dev/coyote_miner/sphlib-3.0/c/sha2big.c:204:10: fatal error: 'md_helper.c' file not found
#include "md_helper.c"
         ^
1 warning and 1 error generated.

Offline bytemaster

Re: GetWork Miner 120 HPM on 3.4Ghz i7 3x faster than coyote pool miner
« Reply #36 on: November 13, 2013, 08:12:07 pm »
I get this when compiling on 10.9:
Quote
warning: unknown warning option '-Wno-unused-local-typedefs' [-Wunknown-warning-option]
/Users/deweydb/Dev/coyote_miner/sphlib-3.0/c/sha2big.c:204:10: fatal error: 'md_helper.c' file not found
#include "md_helper.c"
         ^
1 warning and 1 error generated.

Make sure you pull the latest, it was missing in an earlier checkin.
For the latest updates checkout my blog: http://bytemaster.bitshares.org
Anything said on these forums does not constitute an intent to create a legal obligation or contract between myself and anyone else.   These are merely my opinions and I reserve the right to change them at any time.

Offline kenpodragon

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 64
    • View Profile
Re: GetWork Miner 120 HPM on 3.4Ghz i7 3x faster than coyote pool miner
« Reply #37 on: November 13, 2013, 08:14:37 pm »
Had to update CMAKE and Boost

Code: [Select]
git clone git://cmake.org/cmake.git
cd cmake/cmake-2.8.12.1
./configure
make
make install
export CMAKE_ROOT=/usr/local/share/cmake-2.8.12.1

wget http://sourceforge.net/projects/boost/files/boost/1.55.0/boost_1_55_0.tar.bz2/download
tar --bzip2 -xf /path/to/boost_1_55_0.tar.bz2
./bootstrap.sh
./b2
./b2 install

/usr/local/bin/cmake -DBOOST_ROOT=/path/to/boost_1_55_0 .

Added in the step to use the updated version of boost

Offline kenpodragon

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 64
    • View Profile
Re: GetWork Miner 120 HPM on 3.4Ghz i7 3x faster than coyote pool miner
« Reply #38 on: November 13, 2013, 08:18:17 pm »
Not finding much in the way of speed improvements
 14.8261 hpm
 28.9676 hpm
 22.3346 hpm
 23.9403 hpm
 25.1426 hpm
 30.388 hpm
 34.3772 hpm
 44.3091 hpm
 48.7179 hpm
 47.0896 hpm
 46.0226 hpm
 47.3313 hpm
 48.5786 hpm
 47.1027 hpm
 48.0321 hpm
 44.8933 hpm
 45.8726 hpm

vs 200hpm using the jhProtominer

Offline glongsword

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 51
    • View Profile
Re: GetWork Miner 120 HPM on 3.4Ghz i7 3x faster than coyote pool miner
« Reply #39 on: November 13, 2013, 08:19:08 pm »

Make sure you pull the latest, it was missing in an earlier checkin.

If it's running correctly, should there be some text output?

Offline bytemaster

Re: GetWork Miner 120 HPM on 3.4Ghz i7 3x faster than coyote pool miner
« Reply #40 on: November 13, 2013, 08:20:22 pm »
Not finding much in the way of speed improvements
 14.8261 hpm
 28.9676 hpm
 22.3346 hpm
 23.9403 hpm
 25.1426 hpm
 30.388 hpm
 34.3772 hpm
 44.3091 hpm
 48.7179 hpm
 47.0896 hpm
 46.0226 hpm
 47.3313 hpm
 48.5786 hpm
 47.1027 hpm
 48.0321 hpm
 44.8933 hpm
 45.8726 hpm

vs 200hpm using the jhProtominer

System and OS?   Is that while operational or in the benchmark?
For the latest updates checkout my blog: http://bytemaster.bitshares.org
Anything said on these forums does not constitute an intent to create a legal obligation or contract between myself and anyone else.   These are merely my opinions and I reserve the right to change them at any time.

Offline bytemaster

Re: GetWork Miner 120 HPM on 3.4Ghz i7 3x faster than coyote pool miner
« Reply #41 on: November 13, 2013, 08:21:11 pm »

Make sure you pull the latest, it was missing in an earlier checkin.

If it's running correctly, should there be some text output?

Yes, with no args it should print the benchmark.   
For the latest updates checkout my blog: http://bytemaster.bitshares.org
Anything said on these forums does not constitute an intent to create a legal obligation or contract between myself and anyone else.   These are merely my opinions and I reserve the right to change them at any time.

Offline kenpodragon

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 64
    • View Profile
Re: GetWork Miner 120 HPM on 3.4Ghz i7 3x faster than coyote pool miner
« Reply #42 on: November 13, 2013, 08:21:24 pm »
i7 980 windows 8
new coyote -110 hpm
coyote miner 37hpm
jhProtominer 150hpm

Offline Snard

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 62
    • View Profile
Re: GetWork Miner 120 HPM on 3.4Ghz i7 3x faster than coyote pool miner
« Reply #43 on: November 13, 2013, 08:21:32 pm »
Can anyone provide info on how to setup this with solo mining?
If I helped, feel free to send me a tip :)
PTS: PbXr2kcy7kJFxFSofakveWD1GCwnt9LGHs
BTC: 145TJPaJ59G9xDJWovQDG2BbiupwULWwPC

Offline bytemaster

Re: GetWork Miner 120 HPM on 3.4Ghz i7 3x faster than coyote pool miner
« Reply #44 on: November 13, 2013, 08:22:19 pm »
Not finding much in the way of speed improvements
 14.8261 hpm
 28.9676 hpm
 22.3346 hpm
 23.9403 hpm
 25.1426 hpm
 30.388 hpm
 34.3772 hpm
 44.3091 hpm
 48.7179 hpm
 47.0896 hpm
 46.0226 hpm
 47.3313 hpm
 48.5786 hpm
 47.1027 hpm
 48.0321 hpm
 44.8933 hpm
 45.8726 hpm

vs 200hpm using the jhProtominer

How many cores are you using with jhProtominer.... this still requires running 1 instance per 8 cores.
For the latest updates checkout my blog: http://bytemaster.bitshares.org
Anything said on these forums does not constitute an intent to create a legal obligation or contract between myself and anyone else.   These are merely my opinions and I reserve the right to change them at any time.