Author Topic: GetWork Miner 130 HPM on 3.4Ghz i7 3x faster than coyote pool miner  (Read 25299 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline bytemaster

Re: GetWork Miner 120 HPM on 3.4Ghz i7 3x faster than coyote pool miner
« Reply #45 on: November 13, 2013, 08:23:10 pm »
Can anyone provide info on how to setup this with solo mining?

Launch your

 ProtoSHares-Qt.exe -server -rpcuser=user -rpcpassword=pass
./gw_miner.exe localhost user pass
For the latest updates checkout my blog: http://bytemaster.bitshares.org
Anything said on these forums does not constitute an intent to create a legal obligation or contract between myself and anyone else.   These are merely my opinions and I reserve the right to change them at any time.

Offline kenpodragon

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 64
    • View Profile
Re: GetWork Miner 120 HPM on 3.4Ghz i7 3x faster than coyote pool miner
« Reply #46 on: November 13, 2013, 08:23:23 pm »
Not finding much in the way of speed improvements
 44.8933 hpm
 45.8726 hpm

vs 200hpm using the jhProtominer

System and OS?   Is that while operational or in the benchmark?

Both - Debian x64 8vcpu 8gb ram

Offline kenpodragon

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 64
    • View Profile
Re: GetWork Miner 120 HPM on 3.4Ghz i7 3x faster than coyote pool miner
« Reply #47 on: November 13, 2013, 08:24:37 pm »
How many cores are you using with jhProtominer.... this still requires running 1 instance per 8 cores.

Both are set at 8 cores to keep things equalized.

Offline bytemaster

Re: GetWork Miner 120 HPM on 3.4Ghz i7 3x faster than coyote pool miner
« Reply #48 on: November 13, 2013, 08:27:44 pm »
Did you compile in release mode?   Something doesn't add up because I can get 40 HPM on digital ocean (quad core).
For the latest updates checkout my blog: http://bytemaster.bitshares.org
Anything said on these forums does not constitute an intent to create a legal obligation or contract between myself and anyone else.   These are merely my opinions and I reserve the right to change them at any time.

Offline crendore

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 48
    • View Profile
Re: GetWork Miner 120 HPM on 3.4Ghz i7 3x faster than coyote pool miner
« Reply #49 on: November 13, 2013, 08:29:29 pm »
hey bytemaster any idea about this error?
http://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=573.msg5661#msg5661

i found this random file on the net and put it in that directory and it seems to compile.

http://www.iis.ee.ethz.ch/~sha3/gmu_sha2/simvectors/md_helper.c.html

So maybe your repo is just missing that file?

Offline glongsword

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 51
    • View Profile
Re: GetWork Miner 120 HPM on 3.4Ghz i7 3x faster than coyote pool miner
« Reply #50 on: November 13, 2013, 08:30:11 pm »
hey bytemaster any idea about this error?
http://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=573.msg5661#msg5661

i found this random file on the net and put it in that directory and it seems to compile.

http://www.iis.ee.ethz.ch/~sha3/gmu_sha2/simvectors/md_helper.c.html

So maybe your repo is just missing that file?

git pull fixes that.

Offline crendore

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 48
    • View Profile
Re: GetWork Miner 120 HPM on 3.4Ghz i7 3x faster than coyote pool miner
« Reply #51 on: November 13, 2013, 08:32:36 pm »
Ahhh thanks! now how do i compile in release mode? i only get 60 HPM on i7 4.5GHz

Offline bytemaster

Re: GetWork Miner 120 HPM on 3.4Ghz i7 3x faster than coyote pool miner
« Reply #52 on: November 13, 2013, 08:36:16 pm »
cmake . -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release
For the latest updates checkout my blog: http://bytemaster.bitshares.org
Anything said on these forums does not constitute an intent to create a legal obligation or contract between myself and anyone else.   These are merely my opinions and I reserve the right to change them at any time.

Offline bytemaster

Re: GetWork Miner 120 HPM on 3.4Ghz i7 3x faster than coyote pool miner
« Reply #53 on: November 13, 2013, 08:36:59 pm »
Please only report numbers from the benchmark... it may run slower doing getwork requests until I pipeline it.   Also, please let it finish the benchmark.
For the latest updates checkout my blog: http://bytemaster.bitshares.org
Anything said on these forums does not constitute an intent to create a legal obligation or contract between myself and anyone else.   These are merely my opinions and I reserve the right to change them at any time.

Offline kenpodragon

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 64
    • View Profile
Re: GetWork Miner 120 HPM on 3.4Ghz i7 3x faster than coyote pool miner
« Reply #54 on: November 13, 2013, 08:39:37 pm »
debug vs release gives about 7hpm difference. 40 vs 47.


Offline crendore

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 48
    • View Profile
Re: GetWork Miner 120 HPM on 3.4Ghz i7 3x faster than coyote pool miner
« Reply #55 on: November 13, 2013, 08:40:02 pm »
benchmark? what benchmark? where do i find this? still getting only ~60HPM with i7 4.5 GHZ and built with:
cmake . -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release

Offline gigawatt

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 27
    • View Profile
Re: GetWork Miner 120 HPM on 3.4Ghz i7 3x faster than coyote pool miner
« Reply #56 on: November 13, 2013, 08:41:05 pm »
Any ideas?

Code: [Select]
[  1%] Building CXX object CMakeFiles/fc.dir/src/thread/thread.cpp.o
In file included from /usr/local/include/boost/atomic/detail/platform.hpp:22:0,
                 from /usr/local/include/boost/atomic/atomic.hpp:17,
                 from /usr/local/include/boost/atomic.hpp:12,
                 from /usr/local/include/boost/thread/pthread/once_atomic.hpp:20,
                 from /usr/local/include/boost/thread/once.hpp:20,
                 from /usr/local/include/boost/thread.hpp:17,
                 from /root/fc/src/thread/thread_d.hpp:4,
                 from /root/fc/src/thread/thread.cpp:5:
/usr/local/include/boost/atomic/detail/gcc-atomic.hpp: In member function âvoid fc::thread_d::process_tasks()â:
/usr/local/include/boost/atomic/detail/gcc-atomic.hpp:1081:95: error: invalid memory model for â__atomic_exchangeâ
make[2]: *** [CMakeFiles/fc.dir/src/thread/thread.cpp.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [CMakeFiles/fc.dir/all] Error 2
BTC: 1E2egHUcLDAmcxcqZqpL18TPLx9Xj1akcV
PTS: Pstkk1gZCxc4GEwS1eBAykYwVmcubU1P8L

Offline bytemaster

Re: GetWork Miner 120 HPM on 3.4Ghz i7 3x faster than coyote pool miner
« Reply #57 on: November 13, 2013, 08:42:36 pm »
Any ideas?

Code: [Select]
[  1%] Building CXX object CMakeFiles/fc.dir/src/thread/thread.cpp.o
In file included from /usr/local/include/boost/atomic/detail/platform.hpp:22:0,
                 from /usr/local/include/boost/atomic/atomic.hpp:17,
                 from /usr/local/include/boost/atomic.hpp:12,
                 from /usr/local/include/boost/thread/pthread/once_atomic.hpp:20,
                 from /usr/local/include/boost/thread/once.hpp:20,
                 from /usr/local/include/boost/thread.hpp:17,
                 from /root/fc/src/thread/thread_d.hpp:4,
                 from /root/fc/src/thread/thread.cpp:5:
/usr/local/include/boost/atomic/detail/gcc-atomic.hpp: In member function âvoid fc::thread_d::process_tasks()â:
/usr/local/include/boost/atomic/detail/gcc-atomic.hpp:1081:95: error: invalid memory model for â__atomic_exchangeâ
make[2]: *** [CMakeFiles/fc.dir/src/thread/thread.cpp.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [CMakeFiles/fc.dir/all] Error 2

Thats a new one... what type of system ? Boost version?  That bug looks like it is in the boost code.
For the latest updates checkout my blog: http://bytemaster.bitshares.org
Anything said on these forums does not constitute an intent to create a legal obligation or contract between myself and anyone else.   These are merely my opinions and I reserve the right to change them at any time.

Offline bytemaster

Re: GetWork Miner 120 HPM on 3.4Ghz i7 3x faster than coyote pool miner
« Reply #58 on: November 13, 2013, 08:43:47 pm »
debug vs release gives about 7hpm difference. 40 vs 47.
How long did you let the benchmark run?
For the latest updates checkout my blog: http://bytemaster.bitshares.org
Anything said on these forums does not constitute an intent to create a legal obligation or contract between myself and anyone else.   These are merely my opinions and I reserve the right to change them at any time.

Offline Gumik

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 9
    • View Profile
Re: GetWork Miner 120 HPM on 3.4Ghz i7 3x faster than coyote pool miner
« Reply #59 on: November 13, 2013, 08:47:35 pm »
Code: [Select]
Boost version: 1.55.0
Boost include path: /usr/include
Could not find the following static Boost libraries:
        boost_context
Some (but not all) of the required Boost libraries were found. You may need to install these additional Boost libraries. Alternatively, set BOOST_LIBRARYDIR to the directory containing Boost libraries or BOOST_ROOT to the location of Boost.
** for a debug build: cmake -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Debug ..

Seems there is a fcontext.hpp in /usr/include/boost but no context
XPM : AaMussGvG8963TZKswLVwY1BNG3zs22MvK
PTS : PpTe2GPfXkk1T4boaPATERzwVx5Sn5nyRr