Author Topic: DNS的域名后缀.p2p是不是太极客了?  (Read 8489 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline jojomaster

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 205
    • View Profile

Offline PTS中国

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 416
    • View Profile
  • BitShares: ptschina
支持pp,这个真不错。
希望3i能改成pp,对将来收益无穷的。
p2p,打字太麻烦了,不利于使用的。

 :) :) :) :) PP,多好 +5%
--------

PTS中国

Offline hiver

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 76
    • View Profile

Offline ebit

  • Committee member
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1905
    • View Profile
  • BitShares: ebit
这个不必太计较,我很少输入网址,有收藏夹,有搜索引擎。

顺路拉票,受托人x.ebit
telegram:ebit521
https://weibo.com/ebiter

Offline KyLin

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 232
    • View Profile


Offline 小飞飞

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 35
    • View Profile
谢谢投票~ btc38.com.btsx-exchange , btc38.com.crypto-exchange

Offline bitshare007777

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 88
    • View Profile

Offline Nimrod

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 133
    • View Profile
We can make ".pp" and "ptp" both resolve to the ".p2p" address. This happens at the level of the DNS resolver, and not the level of the DAC namespace.

From the perspective of the DAC, it doesn't matter.

So it is not a big concern. Usability layer is a different layer from the DAC technical implementation.

 :) Thanks for your reply.

Offline toast

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4001
    • View Profile
  • BitShares: nikolai
We can make ".pp" and "ptp" both resolve to the ".p2p" address. This happens at the level of the DNS resolver, and not the level of the DAC namespace.

From the perspective of the DAC, it doesn't matter.

So it is not a big concern. Usability layer is a different layer from the DAC technical implementation.
Do not use this post as information for making any important decisions. The only agreements I ever make are informal and non-binding. Take the same precautions as when dealing with a compromised account, scammer, sockpuppet, etc.

Offline gyhy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 852
    • View Profile

Offline Musewhale

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2881
  • 丑,实在是太丑了 !
    • View Profile
.dns也不错

不过p2p的意思是表现的最好的,可是之前真没想到还有输入麻烦这问题 :-X :-X :-X
MUSE witness:mygoodfriend     vote for me

Offline sfinder

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1205
  • 4 Cores CPU+100GB SSD+anti-DDoS Pro
    • View Profile
toast答复如下,他可以考虑让ptp指向p2p,大家的可以提更好的建议

The actual domain rwsolution doesn't happen on the dac but I n the resolvers, so it is no problem for ".ptp" to work along with ".p2p" and point to the same thing

Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk
微博:星在飘我在找|BTS X 受托人delegate ID:baidu
中国教育书店合作将20%收入捐献给贫困山区学生。
Cooperating with China Education Bookstore and will donate 20% of delegate income to the poor students

Offline KyLin

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 232
    • View Profile

Offline zhao150

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 606
  • 老子早就不想当代表了
    • View Profile
支持pp,这个真不错。
希望3i能改成pp,对将来收益无穷的。
p2p,打字太麻烦了,不利于使用的。
老子早就不想当代表了

Offline crazybit

不知道.con在传统域名系统里是不是顶级域名con =connection感觉不错。

Offline Overthetop

其实,我觉得PP就成了,大家用了自然明白是点对点的意思。

一个名字的含义,可以是最开始赋予的,以后大家就懂了。

个人微博账号: Overthetop_万里晴空
“块链创新与创业”交流群: 330378613

Offline orlander

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 58
    • View Profile

Offline sudo

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2255
    • View Profile
  • BitShares: ags
支持使用dns
虽然智能机的键盘可以通过点击输入p  上划输入2……
« Last Edit: August 09, 2014, 02:41:23 am by sudo »

Offline bulabu

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 122
    • View Profile
字母+数字用作二级域名已经很麻烦了,用作顶级域名是反人类的……

Offline Nimrod

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 133
    • View Profile
DNS 发布在即,等了好久都没人提出这个问题。

P2P 这可是数字和字母混搭,犯了优秀域名的大忌。老外的网站可是宁愿10个字母以上也不愿意用字母数字混搭的。以后如果发展到移动平台上,输完字母 ' p ' 还要切换到数字键盘输入 ' 2 ', 再切换到字母键盘输入 ' p ' 这可不是一般的麻烦。而且美学上说google.p2p   baidu.p2p  这样的域名也是不够好的。我觉得后缀就算直接用   .dns 也比这个要好。大家怎么说呢?

ps:我认为域名后缀像 com net  这样是最佳的,有元音和辅音,这样读起来就可以只发一次音,p2p只能读 "p" "2" "p",而且在英语国家里,你读 p2p 是有可能被误会成 ptwop的,这也是外国很少用数字+字母做域名的原因。

toast:
We can make ".pp" and "ptp" both resolve to the ".p2p" address. This happens at the level of the DNS resolver, and not the level of the DAC namespace.

From the perspective of the DAC, it doesn't matter.

So it is not a big concern. Usability layer is a different layer from the DAC technical implementation.
« Last Edit: August 09, 2014, 09:07:05 am by Nimrod »