Author Topic: DNS的域名后缀.p2p是不是太极客了？ (Read 8531 times)

We can make ".pp" and "ptp" both resolve to the ".p2p" address. This happens at the level of the DNS resolver, and not the level of the DAC namespace.

From the perspective of the DAC, it doesn't matter.

So it is not a big concern. Usability layer is a different layer from the DAC technical implementation.

Thanks for your reply.

toast

We can make ".pp" and "ptp" both resolve to the ".p2p" address. This happens at the level of the DNS resolver, and not the level of the DAC namespace.

From the perspective of the DAC, it doesn't matter.

So it is not a big concern. Usability layer is a different layer from the DAC technical implementation.

gyhy

支持pp，
p2p不好

Musewhale

.dns也不错

不过p2p的意思是表现的最好的，可是之前真没想到还有输入麻烦这问题

sfinder

toast答复如下，他可以考虑让ptp指向p2p，大家的可以提更好的建议

Quote from: toast on August 09, 2014, 03:19:11 am

The actual domain rwsolution doesn't happen on the dac but I n the resolvers, so it is no problem for ".ptp" to work along with ".p2p" and point to the same thing

Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk

KyLin

我支持用pp

zhao150

支持pp，这个真不错。
希望3i能改成pp，对将来收益无穷的。
p2p，打字太麻烦了，不利于使用的。

crazybit

不知道.con在传统域名系统里是不是顶级域名con =connection感觉不错。

Overthetop

其实，我觉得PP就成了，大家用了自然明白是点对点的意思。

一个名字的含义，可以是最开始赋予的，以后大家就懂了。

orlander

pzp 吧

sudo · « *Last Edit: August 09, 2014, 02:41:23 am by sudo* »

支持使用dns
虽然智能机的键盘可以通过点击输入p 上划输入2……

bulabu

字母+数字用作二级域名已经很麻烦了，用作顶级域名是反人类的……

Nimrod · « *Last Edit: August 09, 2014, 09:07:05 am by Nimrod* »

DNS 发布在即，等了好久都没人提出这个问题。

P2P 这可是数字和字母混搭，犯了优秀域名的大忌。老外的网站可是宁愿10个字母以上也不愿意用字母数字混搭的。以后如果发展到移动平台上，输完字母 ' p ' 还要切换到数字键盘输入 ' 2 ', 再切换到字母键盘输入 ' p ' 这可不是一般的麻烦。而且美学上说google.p2p baidu.p2p 这样的域名也是不够好的。我觉得后缀就算直接用 .dns 也比这个要好。大家怎么说呢？

ps:我认为域名后缀像 com net 这样是最佳的，有元音和辅音，这样读起来就可以只发一次音，p2p只能读 "p" "2" "p"，而且在英语国家里，你读 p2p 是有可能被误会成 ptwop的，这也是外国很少用数字＋字母做域名的原因。

toast:

Quote from: toast on August 09, 2014, 05:12:59 am

We can make ".pp" and "ptp" both resolve to the ".p2p" address. This happens at the level of the DNS resolver, and not the level of the DAC namespace.

From the perspective of the DAC, it doesn't matter.

So it is not a big concern. Usability layer is a different layer from the DAC technical implementation.