[DNS] ** LAST CHANCE TO CHECK ALLOCATION **

[deejay]

I dont' really understand this post. Is this json on githubusercontent containing the future coin distribution for the DNS project?

I own AGS and PTS, my AGS balance is here:
http://www1.agsexplorer.com/balances/152nRpBkqiFpa6YTG63Z4AnjUfM9y9jCwx

I own 1338.6988 PTS, i bought these before 15 july 2014.

Should i be in that list?

If so, which address should i use to look in the list if i am there?

Regards, DJ

[38PTSWarrior]

I'm in. So nice feeling!

"PmJwbQBFssGK1yd1GLQb8hHswzyRkqqNzB",
8689302181000

[toast]

Thanks vikram and clar, I fixed that mistake and now the total is exactly 500000000000000000

[toast]

I have 2 BTC addresses, and 5 PTS addresses all with only AGS allocations. After taking the quoted annoyance with AGSExplorer into account, all 7 of my addresses are exactly represented (modulo rounding errors) as ( 100,000,000,000 * AGSExplorer_value ) in this commit's genesis block: https://github.com/keyid/keyid/blob/805949683d21dd4d02a1e8e109929411611f1844/libraries/blockchain/genesis.json

All of these checks are meaningless, however, until somebody sums all of the balances in the file and verifies the total supply, and also until the file is verified to be well-formed JSON; see e.g.:

Hug?

Code: [Select]

235800         [
235801             "PuTHy9uGtdHdJ9ch1kTtrLkGkTuHe7HwSR",
235802             1177308757                                                                                                                                                                                                     
235803             47092115
235804         ],


The typo above seems to be the only place with error in the json file.

By simply concatenating the digits at the above error and  modifying my script to sum up the total in the genesis block json, total sum of allocation is   6,177,308,745.22691250

By removing the first line of digits and keeping only the second line of digits at the above error, I got the total sum of allocation: 4,999,999,988.22691250. This seems to be more correct.



It may not be equivalent to the total supply.

toast used this website (http://ptsags.quisquis.de/ ) to generate the genesis file, and the total sum should equal to 5,000,000,000 including dev fund.

" 47092115" belongs to ["PmmFHqcApEPqibJEzqvvBhduEaDwgn7LFQ",47092115] which is just beside ["PuTHy9uGtdHdJ9ch1kTtrLkGkTuHe7HwSR",1177308757],

are you saying there should be both of them like this:

Code: [Select]

["PmmFHqcApEPqibJEzqvvBhduEaDwgn7LFQ",47092115],
["PuTHy9uGtdHdJ9ch1kTtrLkGkTuHe7HwSR",1177308757]
Instead of

Code: [Select]

        [
            "PuTHy9uGtdHdJ9ch1kTtrLkGkTuHe7HwSR",
            1177308757
            47092115
        ],
?

[betax]

I have modified the orginal bitbalance to check the DNS allocation. It seems to be fine with a mixture of BTC, PTS AGS donation and very small amount of PTS.

http://bitbalance.azurewebsites.net/

[xeroc]

Code: [Select]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total 5000000000.0 available:    5,000,000,000.00000000
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
top 10 addresses collective percentage
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
top    1 addresses collectively own     273,379,229 DNS (  5.47%)
top    2 addresses collectively own     473,379,229 DNS (  9.47%)
top    3 addresses collectively own     673,379,229 DNS ( 13.47%)
top    4 addresses collectively own     873,379,229 DNS ( 17.47%)
top    5 addresses collectively own   1,073,379,229 DNS ( 21.47%)
top    6 addresses collectively own   1,273,379,229 DNS ( 25.47%)
top    7 addresses collectively own   1,424,191,726 DNS ( 28.48%)
top    8 addresses collectively own   1,486,052,280 DNS ( 29.72%)
top    9 addresses collectively own   1,544,917,424 DNS ( 30.90%)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
top 10 addresses individual percentage
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
top    1 addresse individually owns     273,379,229 DNS (  5.47%)
top    2 addresse individually owns     200,000,000 DNS (  4.00%)
top    3 addresse individually owns     200,000,000 DNS (  4.00%)
top    4 addresse individually owns     200,000,000 DNS (  4.00%)
top    5 addresse individually owns     200,000,000 DNS (  4.00%)
top    6 addresse individually owns     200,000,000 DNS (  4.00%)
top    7 addresse individually owns     150,812,498 DNS (  3.02%)
top    8 addresse individually owns      61,860,554 DNS (  1.24%)
top    9 addresse individually owns      58,865,144 DNS (  1.18%)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
address/amount distribution
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
address with >             10 DNS:   46,242
address with >             30 DNS:   39,099
address with >             50 DNS:   37,093
address with >             70 DNS:   35,734
address with >             90 DNS:   34,789
address with >            100 DNS:   34,194
address with >            300 DNS:   28,921
address with >            500 DNS:   27,182
address with >            700 DNS:   25,994
address with >            900 DNS:   25,141
address with >          1,000 DNS:   24,771
address with >          3,000 DNS:   17,651
address with >          5,000 DNS:   15,408
address with >          7,000 DNS:   14,143
address with >          9,000 DNS:   13,263
address with >         10,000 DNS:   12,894
address with >         30,000 DNS:    9,086
address with >         50,000 DNS:    6,448
address with >         70,000 DNS:    5,221
address with >         90,000 DNS:    4,580
address with >        100,000 DNS:    4,304
address with >        300,000 DNS:    1,929
address with >        500,000 DNS:    1,287
address with >        700,000 DNS:      908
address with >        900,000 DNS:      710
address with >      1,000,000 DNS:      627
address with >      3,000,000 DNS:      143
address with >      5,000,000 DNS:       96
address with >      7,000,000 DNS:       71
address with >      9,000,000 DNS:       60
address with >     10,000,000 DNS:       45
address with >     30,000,000 DNS:       12
address with >     50,000,000 DNS:       12
address with >     70,000,000 DNS:        7
address with >     90,000,000 DNS:        7
address with >    100,000,000 DNS:        7





python3 script
https://github.com/xeroc/pytshares/blob/master/genesisStats.py

[clar]

https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=7251.msg99579#msg99579

[clar]

I have 2 BTC addresses, and 5 PTS addresses all with only AGS allocations. After taking the quoted annoyance with AGSExplorer into account, all 7 of my addresses are exactly represented (modulo rounding errors) as ( 100,000,000,000 * AGSExplorer_value ) in this commit's genesis block: https://github.com/keyid/keyid/blob/805949683d21dd4d02a1e8e109929411611f1844/libraries/blockchain/genesis.json

All of these checks are meaningless, however, until somebody sums all of the balances in the file and verifies the total supply, and also until the file is verified to be well-formed JSON; see e.g.:

Hug?

Code: [Select]

235800         [
235801             "PuTHy9uGtdHdJ9ch1kTtrLkGkTuHe7HwSR",
235802             1177308757                                                                                                                                                                                                     
235803             47092115
235804         ],


The typo above seems to be the only place with error in the json file.

By simply concatenating the digits at the above error and  modifying my script to sum up the total in the genesis block json, total sum of allocation is   6,177,308,745.22691250

By removing the first line of digits and keeping only the second line of digits at the above error, I got the total sum of allocation: 4,999,999,988.22691250. This seems to be more correct.



It may not be equivalent to the total supply.

toast used this website (http://ptsags.quisquis.de/ ) to generate the genesis file, and the total sum should equal to 5,000,000,000 including dev fund.

" 47092115" belongs to ["PmmFHqcApEPqibJEzqvvBhduEaDwgn7LFQ",47092115] which is just beside ["PuTHy9uGtdHdJ9ch1kTtrLkGkTuHe7HwSR",1177308757],

[ffwong]

It seems agsexplorer only show the total AGS of all related PTS addresses, instead of individual address.
It is a bit difficult to double check with the DNS allocation.

On the balance page, there's a link to toggle "merged/separate" view on the right hand side of the look up address.  By default, merged view is displayed, you can switch to separate view for your purpose.

Sample link:
http://www1.agsexplorer.com/balances/xxxxxx?view=seperate

Thanks. This is useful.

[boombastic]

It seems agsexplorer only show the total AGS of all related PTS addresses, instead of individual address.
It is a bit difficult to double check with the DNS allocation.

On the balance page, there's a link to toggle "merged/separate" view on the right hand side of the look up address.  By default, merged view is displayed, you can switch to separate view for your purpose.

Sample link:
http://www1.agsexplorer.com/balances/xxxxxx?view=seperate

[ffwong]

I have 2 BTC addresses, and 5 PTS addresses all with only AGS allocations. After taking the quoted annoyance with AGSExplorer into account, all 7 of my addresses are exactly represented (modulo rounding errors) as ( 100,000,000,000 * AGSExplorer_value ) in this commit's genesis block: https://github.com/keyid/keyid/blob/805949683d21dd4d02a1e8e109929411611f1844/libraries/blockchain/genesis.json

All of these checks are meaningless, however, until somebody sums all of the balances in the file and verifies the total supply, and also until the file is verified to be well-formed JSON; see e.g.:

Hug?

Code: [Select]

235800         [
235801             "PuTHy9uGtdHdJ9ch1kTtrLkGkTuHe7HwSR",
235802             1177308757                                                                                                                                                                                                     
235803             47092115
235804         ],


The typo above seems to be the only place with error in the json file.

By simply concatenating the digits at the above error and  modifying my script to sum up the total in the genesis block json, total sum of allocation is   6,177,308,745.22691250

By removing the first line of digits and keeping only the second line of digits at the above error, I got the total sum of allocation: 4,999,999,988.22691250. This seems to be more correct.



It may not be equivalent to the total supply.

[vikram]

It seems agsexplorer only show the total AGS of all related PTS addresses, instead of individual address.
It is a bit difficult to double check with the DNS allocation.

I have 2 BTC addresses, and 5 PTS addresses all with only AGS allocations. After taking the quoted annoyance with AGSExplorer into account, all 7 of my addresses are exactly represented (modulo rounding errors) as ( 100,000,000,000 * AGSExplorer_value ) in this commit's genesis block: https://github.com/keyid/keyid/blob/805949683d21dd4d02a1e8e109929411611f1844/libraries/blockchain/genesis.json

All of these checks are meaningless, however, until somebody sums all of the balances in the file and verifies the total supply, and also until the file is verified to be well-formed JSON; see e.g.:

Hug?

Code: [Select]

235800         [
235801             "PuTHy9uGtdHdJ9ch1kTtrLkGkTuHe7HwSR",
235802             1177308757                                                                                                                                                                                                     
235803             47092115
235804         ],


[toast]

Sounds like a bounty.. Who wants to recreate the snapshot?

There are several DACs coming up soon, I feel like we at least need an "official" AGS distribution

[hadrian]

Something's not right with address 14fXr2UTa17CadcZ911N7TBFqMLpqsfNae

The same problem arose with Lottoshares here: https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=4879.msg64977#msg64977

AGS Explorer shows 566.53948028 AGS
Your number for this address is 56596237510000

The numbers aren't THAT far out, but other addresses don't seem to have this problem.
I'm curious as to the cause of the discrepancy...

Is it bad form to quote myself? Dunno...

Anyway, is there an explanation for the discrepancy for address 14fXr2UTa17CadcZ911N7TBFqMLpqsfNae?

The figures on AGSexplorer don't seem to match those reported for the genesis blocks.

It's happened with LottoShares and DNS. Will it occur with all DACs? It bothers me because I don't understand it...

[toast]

Just wanted to run the script of
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=9283.0
on the genesis block but couldn't find the total supply (at launch) to make the numbers right!?
is the supply announced? I just know about the distribution

Initial supply is 5bn.

I think genesis block will add up to something below 5bn because keyhotee is excluded so your balance will be scaled up.

I think I better just allocate keyhotee AGS to a key and then burn it on launch so that there isn't this small scaling.