Mistake in AGS distribution (Resolved)

[hadrian]

DNS rewards PTS as well as donations to AGS also done with PTS. No I didn't misread.

Same private key could get a balance in DNS from the amount you see on AGS explorer as well as PTS balance. Which is guaranteed to be a different number if there was also a PTS holding. (Should however be a higher balance not a lower than what AGS explorer is showing)

I see what you mean, but this donation address is a BTC address, so PTS can be taken out of the equation here.

The problem / puzzle remains...

Thanks bitmeat though! I'd love to make sense of this!

[bitmeat]

Same private key could get a balance in DNS from the amount you see on AGS explorer as well as PTS balance. Which is guaranteed to be a different number if there was also a PTS holding. (Should however be a higher balance not a lower than what AGS explorer is showing)

[bitmeat]

DNS rewards PTS as well as donations to AGS also done with PTS. No I didn't misread.

[hadrian]

Ags explorer only tracks donations for AGS doesn't include the PTS snapshots from after AGS donation period ended

Did you misread, "Compare AGS balance with DNS balance" for "Compare AGS balance with PTS balance"?

[edit : The DNS balance should be exactly 1000 x AGS balance. That isn't the case for this address (but seems to hold for other addresses).]

PTS are of no relevance to the problem here.

[bitmeat]

Ags explorer only tracks donations for AGS doesn't include the PTS snapshots from after AGS donation period ended

[hadrian]

Look here: http://www1.agsexplorer.com/balances/14fXr2UTa17CadcZ911N7TBFqMLpqsfNae

Compare AGS balance with DNS balance. There is an obvious discrepancy in the numbers which doesn't appear to exist for other addresses which have AGS.

The mistake is persisting for each new DAC's genesis block it seems.

(The genesis block for LTS also had a discrepancy for this address - I first asked about these discrepancies in June, but nobody seems to have an answer.)

I've started a topic like this elsewhere, (e.g. https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=9510.0) but hope for more visibility here, because I'm so perplexed...

It's niggling me, so I may keep mentioning it until someone tells me to shut up, or some kind of answer is obtained!

Any ideas - what's going on?
In the previous link there was mention of a reward for checking AGS allocations.
I think we need a definitive record of distribution, if there isn't one which is sufficient/correct.