DAC Angels - BitShares PTS Stakeholders Group

[RejectKid]

Now that ProtoShares have largely been distributed, we would like to announce the formation of the ProtoShares Stakeholders Group.  This group will be restricted to those who have over 1000 PTS and would like to work with Invictus Innovations to increase the value of your shares.  We have some major plans in the works and would like you all to be involved.

Please send me a PM or contact us via our website so we can add you to this mailing list.   We are all partners now in the success of ProtoShares and we can do more by working together.

Anyway to have DAC "little" Angels?  I'd love to get in on some action but I have only 280 as of now

Stay tuned... 

There's hope! 

[Stan]

Now that ProtoShares have largely been distributed, we would like to announce the formation of the ProtoShares Stakeholders Group.  This group will be restricted to those who have over 1000 PTS and would like to work with Invictus Innovations to increase the value of your shares.  We have some major plans in the works and would like you all to be involved.

Please send me a PM or contact us via our website so we can add you to this mailing list.   We are all partners now in the success of ProtoShares and we can do more by working together.

Anyway to have DAC "little" Angels?  I'd love to get in on some action but I have only 280 as of now

Stay tuned... 

[RejectKid]

Now that ProtoShares have largely been distributed, we would like to announce the formation of the ProtoShares Stakeholders Group.  This group will be restricted to those who have over 1000 PTS and would like to work with Invictus Innovations to increase the value of your shares.  We have some major plans in the works and would like you all to be involved.

Please send me a PM or contact us via our website so we can add you to this mailing list.   We are all partners now in the success of ProtoShares and we can do more by working together.

Anyway to have DAC "little" Angels?  I'd love to get in on some action but I have only 280 as of now

[KyleChong]

PM sent, please take a look, I am in.

[Agent725]

Count me in.

[HackFisher]

I'm in, looking forward.

[guozhenping]

I'm in

[stuartcharles]

The bottom line is that new DACs require dedicated teams and we have several DAC ideas that need teams behind them.

lovely!
hope we can be the first to the market. because i can see that msc and colored coin have made some progress as well, with cc was claimed to be "very close" to beta by one of its developers.

Agreed, first to the market is hard to beat. Good luck team

[voldemort628]

The bottom line is that new DACs require dedicated teams and we have several DAC ideas that need teams behind them.

lovely!
hope we can be the first to the market. because i can see that msc and colored coin have made some progress as well, with cc was claimed to be "very close" to beta by one of its developers.

[bytemaster]

pm sent，but no response yet. 

There will be no responses, I am just building a mailing list which I will email all at once. 

Nice to see that there are so many people with over 1000 PTS! 

[ysyyhb]

pm sent，but no response yet. 

[bytemaster]

Right now I am taking your word    When you see what we have planned then you will understand.

look forward to that as well.

And i do understand that certain thing can only be released when it times has come. But I believe Invictus could be a lil bit more open on its general direction and plans. For example, this thing comes sort of unnoticed and someone with more than 1000pts might not be aware of this until it's too late (?). Hidden agenda and game are not necessarily the best things for decentralisation.

Dont get me wrong. I am still a supporter of course. and I can see that Invictus have made efforts in enhancing the project's overall professionalism. So I am looking forward to even improvements and developments.

So yea, keep up the good work! and lets do our best for a bright future

It is not so much that we have a hidden agenda, but that we have a general 'idea' and want to refine it before releasing it to everyone.   No one can miss out on anything so that is not an issue.   

We are working on a creative way to bootstrap various DACs using ProtoShares without requiring anyone to give up any PTS.  Those who have significant PTS will have a chance to be angel investors in new DACs with some say who gets to develop it. 

We are trying to find a way for smaller investors to participate, but they will have to delegate some of their responsibility to a trusted party by contributing to a fund.

The bottom line is that new DACs require dedicated teams and we have several DAC ideas that need teams behind them. 

[voldemort628]

Right now I am taking your word    When you see what we have planned then you will understand.

look forward to that as well.

And i do understand that certain thing can only be released when it times has come. But I believe Invictus could be a lil bit more open on its general direction and plans. For example, this thing comes sort of unnoticed and someone with more than 1000pts might not be aware of this until it's too late (?). Hidden agenda and game are not necessarily the best things for decentralisation.

Dont get me wrong. I am still a supporter of course. and I can see that Invictus have made efforts in enhancing the project's overall professionalism. So I am looking forward to even improvements and developments.

So yea, keep up the good work! and lets do our best for a bright future

[ruletheworld]

lol how can you prove that you have more than 1000pts? )

I don't think that's the point. 1000 or 990 or 100 doesn't matter. If you hold enough that you feel you have a stake in this future, you should join I guess

It does matter to some extent until we have infrastructure that reduces overhead enough to allow small investors to participate efficiently.   I have some ideas on this.  It also matters because someone with $7000 on the line has far more incentive to invest time and money than someone with $100 on the line.   

Fair enough, although I was thinking more in terms of relative investment too - if all you hold is 900 PTS, perhaps you feel you have a lot of stake in this. In any case, I guess in this case, the original question stands - how can you prove someone has more than 1000 PTS?

Right now I am taking your word    When you see what we have planned then you will understand.

Ok good, take my word for it, I am a stakeholder! Looking forward to see what you've got planned.

[bytemaster]

lol how can you prove that you have more than 1000pts? )

I don't think that's the point. 1000 or 990 or 100 doesn't matter. If you hold enough that you feel you have a stake in this future, you should join I guess

It does matter to some extent until we have infrastructure that reduces overhead enough to allow small investors to participate efficiently.   I have some ideas on this.  It also matters because someone with $7000 on the line has far more incentive to invest time and money than someone with $100 on the line.   

Fair enough, although I was thinking more in terms of relative investment too - if all you hold is 900 PTS, perhaps you feel you have a lot of stake in this. In any case, I guess in this case, the original question stands - how can you prove someone has more than 1000 PTS?

Right now I am taking your word    When you see what we have planned then you will understand.