Author [EN] [ZH] [ES] [PT] [IT] [DE] [FR] [NL] [TR] [SR] [AR] [RU] [EN] [ZH] [ES] [PT] [IT] [DE] [FR] [NL] [TR] [SR] [AR] [RU] [EN] [ZH] [ES] [PT] [IT] [DE] [FR] [NL] [TR] [SR] [AR] [RU] Topic: Another (Technical) Issue With the Merger  (Read 344 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline emski

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1283
    • View Profile
    • http://lnkd.in/nPbhxG
Another (Technical) Issue With the Merger
« on: October 22, 2014, 07:31:25 AM »

PTS mining virtually stopped.
No new blocks for 16 hours.
I doubt there will be any more.
There were no new blocks since the "Proposed Allocation" Thread.
How many funds will be locked in wrong wallets ?
Imagine the following situation:
PTSHOLDER sends his funds to an exchange when he sees the announcement.
The exchange didn't get the funds as they are unconfirmed.
At least 1 block is mined until 5th of Novemeber.
The funds are not in possession of PTSHOLDER anymore. Exchange requires 6 blocks confirmation in order to release the funds.

What would you advice the PTSHOLDER to do ?

Offline bitmeat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1116
    • View Profile
Re: Another (Technical) Issue With the Merger
« Reply #1 on: October 22, 2014, 07:35:12 AM »
*sigh* I3 is giving lowest amount of fuck humanly possible about PTS.

However I may have a solution to the problem - I suggest people start offering high commission fees for the miners in the transactions.

That should fix it temporarily.

Offline onceuponatime

Re: Another (Technical) Issue With the Merger
« Reply #2 on: October 22, 2014, 07:38:15 AM »
What are you showing as the latest block? I am showing 81359 as the block height, and it is recent.
« Last Edit: October 22, 2014, 07:43:26 AM by onceuponatime »

Offline monsterer

Re: Another (Technical) Issue With the Merger
« Reply #3 on: October 22, 2014, 08:09:50 AM »
Even if that was the case, difficulty would adjust until it became profitable for anyone to mine, then you could mine yourself.
My opinions do not represent those of metaexchange unless explicitly stated.
https://metaexchange.info | Bitcoin<->Altcoin exchange | Instant | Safe | Low spreads

Offline bitmeat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1116
    • View Profile
Re: Another (Technical) Issue With the Merger
« Reply #4 on: October 22, 2014, 08:11:39 AM »
Even if that was the case, difficulty would adjust until it became profitable for anyone to mine, then you could mine yourself.

In 2 weeks? Vaguely remember something about having to wait quite some time before the difficulty would adjust, at least back in the days.

Offline emski

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1283
    • View Profile
    • http://lnkd.in/nPbhxG
Re: Another (Technical) Issue With the Merger
« Reply #5 on: October 22, 2014, 08:37:50 AM »
Difficulty will adjust next year at current rate.
Much later than the snapshot.
I've added a fee to my transactions but apparently it is not enough.

Offline emski

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1283
    • View Profile
    • http://lnkd.in/nPbhxG
Re: Another (Technical) Issue With the Merger
« Reply #6 on: October 22, 2014, 08:56:46 AM »
What are you showing as the latest block? I am showing 81359 as the block height, and it is recent.

https://coinplorer.com/PTS:

about an hour ago   81,358   00000007a6f8a537f741ce3e201ecdb31b5961c397ef311f4a6b826885c6c72a   1 trx
about 2 hours ago   81,357   00000005eb6f5b4ec68b1541c0cbde5db5e80c4a1c3de92b127a965825e032e1   1 trx
about 3 hours ago   81,356   0000000418e78e43d42e2886a36edc63ddf604717b2429e005bd7174dfc0c2d8   1 trx
about 3 hours ago   81,355   0000000b98164793554c07d56f77bfdc395e837470a20f4fde0d5bc7e6fbb76c   1 trx
about 11 hours ago   81,354   0000000516d1e111cbff393d82531758b88ecd1b1b886c9487eb8ca208495f67   1 trx
about 12 hours ago   81,353   000000090ff6ae78dd1f591c4fa6cdd0ba3aec4628cf3d053f75c786f6f22c4d   1 trx
about 14 hours ago   81,352   00000009ac5308a0934702ed09ff178d0548e6b11950a3de82bec48820ee33cf   12 trx
about 15 hours ago   81,351   000000092b70936558d5ddddc5f25006010e20893dab8a1275b687d500d82103   1 trx

I wonder why my transactions are not included . I wonder why there is only 1 transaction per block.

Offline xeroc

  • Board Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12057
  • ChainSquad GmbH
    • View Profile
    • ChainSquad GmbH
  • BTS: xeroc
  • GitHub: xeroc
Re: Another (Technical) Issue With the Merger
« Reply #7 on: October 22, 2014, 08:57:55 AM »
Sorry to be that harsh .. but:
Thank god that this BS POW will finally come to an end!
Give BitShares a try! Use the http://testnet.bitshares.eu provided by http://bitshares.eu powered by ChainSquad GmbH

Offline xeroc

  • Board Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12057
  • ChainSquad GmbH
    • View Profile
    • ChainSquad GmbH
  • BTS: xeroc
  • GitHub: xeroc
Re: Another (Technical) Issue With the Merger
« Reply #8 on: October 22, 2014, 08:58:43 AM »
What are you showing as the latest block? I am showing 81359 as the block height, and it is recent.

https://coinplorer.com/PTS:

about an hour ago   81,358   00000007a6f8a537f741ce3e201ecdb31b5961c397ef311f4a6b826885c6c72a   1 trx
about 2 hours ago   81,357   00000005eb6f5b4ec68b1541c0cbde5db5e80c4a1c3de92b127a965825e032e1   1 trx
about 3 hours ago   81,356   0000000418e78e43d42e2886a36edc63ddf604717b2429e005bd7174dfc0c2d8   1 trx
about 3 hours ago   81,355   0000000b98164793554c07d56f77bfdc395e837470a20f4fde0d5bc7e6fbb76c   1 trx
about 11 hours ago   81,354   0000000516d1e111cbff393d82531758b88ecd1b1b886c9487eb8ca208495f67   1 trx
about 12 hours ago   81,353   000000090ff6ae78dd1f591c4fa6cdd0ba3aec4628cf3d053f75c786f6f22c4d   1 trx
about 14 hours ago   81,352   00000009ac5308a0934702ed09ff178d0548e6b11950a3de82bec48820ee33cf   12 trx
about 15 hours ago   81,351   000000092b70936558d5ddddc5f25006010e20893dab8a1275b687d500d82103   1 trx

I wonder why my transactions are not included . I wonder why there is only 1 transaction per block.
That's the power of the miners .. they just "don't want" to include ANY tx .. except coinbase
Give BitShares a try! Use the http://testnet.bitshares.eu provided by http://bitshares.eu powered by ChainSquad GmbH

Offline emski

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1283
    • View Profile
    • http://lnkd.in/nPbhxG
Re: Another (Technical) Issue With the Merger
« Reply #9 on: October 22, 2014, 08:59:29 AM »
Does PTS transactions expire ?

Offline xeroc

  • Board Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12057
  • ChainSquad GmbH
    • View Profile
    • ChainSquad GmbH
  • BTS: xeroc
  • GitHub: xeroc
Re: Another (Technical) Issue With the Merger
« Reply #10 on: October 22, 2014, 09:04:27 AM »
Does PTS transactions expire ?
Not really .. no .. you can only try to double spend using the private key in a wallet that did not see the transaction yet ..



BTW, most recent block is 20 minutes old (1tx thgouth)
Give BitShares a try! Use the http://testnet.bitshares.eu provided by http://bitshares.eu powered by ChainSquad GmbH

Offline emski

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1283
    • View Profile
    • http://lnkd.in/nPbhxG
Re: Another (Technical) Issue With the Merger
« Reply #11 on: October 22, 2014, 09:05:45 AM »
Does PTS transactions expire ?
Not really .. no .. you can only try to double spend using the private key in a wallet that did not see the transaction yet ..



BTW, most recent block is 20 minutes old (1tx thgouth)

My transaction is out there.
Meaning any miner can include it at any time. (the worst would be just before the snapshot).
1tx is the initial transaction rewarding PTS to the miner.

 

Google+