Peter Todd: "Regulators would be smart to shutdown Counterparty"

Started by luckybit, October 22, 2014, 08:50:24 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

luckybit

Quote from: MeTHoDx on October 22, 2014, 09:01:34 PM
I wonder if this was one of the reasons for bytemasters recent push to allow a DAC to self fund itself. Would make an awful lot of sense through that lens.

Is the SEC vulnerable to regulatory capture?

https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/2k055g/regulators_would_be_smart_to_shutdown/clgqvxr
[url="https://metaexchange.info"]https://metaexchange.info[/url] | Bitcoin<->Altcoin exchange | Instant | Safe | Low spreads

Method-X

I wonder if this was one of the reasons for bytemasters recent push to allow a DAC to self fund itself. Would make an awful lot of sense through that lens.
[url="https://edabit.com"]https://edabit.com[/url]

luckybit

Quote
Peter Todd
‏@petertoddbtc
Regulators would be smart to shutdown Counterparty, a non-IPO'd currency req'd for tech reasons, and force the insecure 2-way-peg sidechains
Quote
Peter Todd ‏@petertoddbtc  5h5 hours ago
@coolbearcjs Rumour is that the SEC and others will be fining/maybe even jailing many players in the BTC crowd funded space.

https://twitter.com/petertoddbtc/status/524947758528999424
[url="https://metaexchange.info"]https://metaexchange.info[/url] | Bitcoin<->Altcoin exchange | Instant | Safe | Low spreads