Author [EN] [ZH] [ES] [PT] [IT] [DE] [FR] [NL] [TR] [SR] [AR] [RU] [EN] [ZH] [ES] [PT] [IT] [DE] [FR] [NL] [TR] [SR] [AR] [RU] [EN] [ZH] [ES] [PT] [IT] [DE] [FR] [NL] [TR] [SR] [AR] [RU] Topic: 0.4.21 segmentation fault  (Read 676 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline toast

0.4.21 segmentation fault
« on: October 23, 2014, 03:23:43 AM »

vikram help!

Code: [Select]
(wallet closed) >>>
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
fc::exception::code (this=0x0) at /root/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/src/exception.cpp:105
105        int64_t      exception::code()const throw() { return my->_code;         }
(gdb) bt
#0  fc::exception::code (this=0x0) at /root/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/src/exception.cpp:105
#1  0x0000000000847419 in operator() (e=..., __closure=0x4c6d268) at /root/bitsharesx/libraries/client/client.cpp:2766
#2  fc::detail::completion_handler_impl<bts::client::client::start_networking(std::function<void()>)::__lambda13, void>::on_complete(const void *, const fc::exception_ptr &) (this=0x4c6d260, v=<optimized out>, e=...) at /root/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/include/fc/thread/future.hpp:54
#3  0x00000000008e0516 in fc::promise_base::_set_value (this=0x4c6d9d8, [email protected]=0x0) at /root/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/src/thread/future.cpp:122
#4  0x0000000000ccfc69 in set_value (this=0x4c6d940) at /root/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/include/fc/thread/future.hpp:158
#5  fc::detail::void_functor_run<bts::net::chain_downloader::get_all_blocks(std::function<void(const bts::blockchain::full_block&, unsigned int)>, uint32_t)::__lambda1>::run(void *, void *) (functor=0x4c6d948, prom=0x4c6d940) at /root/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/include/fc/thread/task.hpp:84
#6  0x00000000008e0fd3 in fc::task_base::run_impl ([email protected]=0x4c6d978) at /root/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/src/thread/task.cpp:43
#7  0x00000000008e1685 in fc::task_base::run ([email protected]=0x4c6d978) at /root/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/src/thread/task.cpp:32
#8  0x00000000008df52e in run_next_task (this=0x1a0de10) at /root/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/src/thread/thread_d.hpp:498
#9  fc::thread_d::process_tasks ([email protected]=0x1a0de10) at /root/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/src/thread/thread_d.hpp:547
#10 0x00000000008df7b6 in fc::thread_d::start_process_tasks (my=27319824) at /root/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/src/thread/thread_d.hpp:475
#11 0x000000000120127e in make_fcontext ()
#12 0x0000000001a0de10 in ?? ()
#13 0x0000000004c8cf00 in ?? ()
#14 0x0000000000000000 in ?? ()
Do not use this post as information for making any important decisions. The only agreements I ever make are informal and non-binding. Take the same precautions as when dealing with a compromised account, scammer, sockpuppet, etc.

Offline bytemaster

Re: 0.4.21 segmentation fault
« Reply #1 on: October 23, 2014, 03:27:47 AM »
Details?
For the latest updates checkout my blog: http://bytemaster.bitshares.org
Anything said on these forums does not constitute an intent to create a legal obligation or contract between myself and anyone else.   These are merely my opinions and I reserve the right to change them at any time.

Offline toast

Re: 0.4.21 segmentation fault
« Reply #2 on: October 23, 2014, 03:28:32 AM »
Details?

I run the client and it instantly crashes with the above backtrace. What else would help?
Do not use this post as information for making any important decisions. The only agreements I ever make are informal and non-binding. Take the same precautions as when dealing with a compromised account, scammer, sockpuppet, etc.

Offline bytemaster

Re: 0.4.21 segmentation fault
« Reply #3 on: October 23, 2014, 03:29:20 AM »
Ok.  I'll try to reproduce.   OS?
For the latest updates checkout my blog: http://bytemaster.bitshares.org
Anything said on these forums does not constitute an intent to create a legal obligation or contract between myself and anyone else.   These are merely my opinions and I reserve the right to change them at any time.

Offline tonyk

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3309
    • View Profile
Re: 0.4.21 segmentation fault
« Reply #4 on: October 23, 2014, 03:31:04 AM »
Now, we were talking about better PR (or is this the better PR? hm?)

I thought toast got some more efficient means of communication with vikram and BM than posting here  :)
« Last Edit: October 23, 2014, 03:35:27 AM by tonyk »
Lack of arbitrage is the problem, isn't it. And this 'should' solves it.

Offline alt

Re: 0.4.21 segmentation fault
« Reply #5 on: October 23, 2014, 03:34:22 AM »
post here maybe not bad,
we got chance to  join  them  :)

Offline xeroc

  • Board Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12176
  • ChainSquad GmbH
    • View Profile
    • ChainSquad GmbH
  • BTS: xeroc
  • GitHub: xeroc
Re: 0.4.21 segmentation fault
« Reply #6 on: October 23, 2014, 06:20:24 AM »
I am having the same segfault .. Posted at github..


2x Debian sid .. both crash
2x archlinux ... all fine
Give BitShares a try! Use the http://testnet.bitshares.eu provided by http://bitshares.eu powered by ChainSquad GmbH

Offline cube

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1404
  • Bit by bit, we will get there!
    • View Profile
  • BTS: bitcube
  • Witness: bitcube
Re: 0.4.21 segmentation fault
« Reply #7 on: October 23, 2014, 06:29:21 AM »
Now, we were talking about better PR (or is this the better PR? hm?)

I thought toast got some more efficient means of communication with vikram and BM than posting here  :)

I think posting technical stuff here is good.  Other people who are facing similar problems can get a quick answer.  Just like a public listed company would halt the trading of their company shares before announcing any major company movement which are share price sensitive, we do need more care when it comes to any announcement/proposal/posts that would potentially affect prices.  Having good PR would help.
ID: bitcube
bitcube is a dedicated witness and committe member. Please vote for bitcube.

Offline xeroc

  • Board Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12176
  • ChainSquad GmbH
    • View Profile
    • ChainSquad GmbH
  • BTS: xeroc
  • GitHub: xeroc
Re: 0.4.21 segmentation fault
« Reply #8 on: October 23, 2014, 09:31:41 AM »
What sense does it make to have a RC if you won't give people the time to install and report bugs?
https://github.com/BitShares/bitshares_toolkit/issues/864
Give BitShares a try! Use the http://testnet.bitshares.eu provided by http://bitshares.eu powered by ChainSquad GmbH

Offline emski

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1283
    • View Profile
    • http://lnkd.in/nPbhxG
Re: 0.4.21 segmentation fault
« Reply #9 on: October 23, 2014, 10:03:09 AM »
I haven't seen that issue on ubuntu 14.04 .

Offline xeroc

  • Board Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12176
  • ChainSquad GmbH
    • View Profile
    • ChainSquad GmbH
  • BTS: xeroc
  • GitHub: xeroc
Re: 0.4.21 segmentation fault
« Reply #10 on: October 23, 2014, 10:16:20 AM »
I haven't seen that issue on ubuntu 14.04 .
For me it seems to be Debian sid related ..

I need sid because of boost .. kind of sucks .. gonna install ubuntu next time :) .. or archlinux
Give BitShares a try! Use the http://testnet.bitshares.eu provided by http://bitshares.eu powered by ChainSquad GmbH

Offline GaltReport

Re: 0.4.21 segmentation fault
« Reply #11 on: October 23, 2014, 11:11:03 AM »
What sense does it make to have a RC if you won't give people the time to install and report bugs?
https://github.com/BitShares/bitshares_toolkit/issues/864

Good point. No sooner did I get RC1 installed and their is another release.

BTW, RC1 running fine for me.  I did find that a reboot after install again gave me a lot more memory so i do this now as regular practice.
« Last Edit: October 23, 2014, 11:12:56 AM by GaltReport »

Offline bytemaster

Re: 0.4.21 segmentation fault
« Reply #12 on: October 23, 2014, 01:48:03 PM »
What sense does it make to have a RC if you won't give people the time to install and report bugs?
https://github.com/BitShares/bitshares_toolkit/issues/864

We had people file and report bugs internally. 
For the latest updates checkout my blog: http://bytemaster.bitshares.org
Anything said on these forums does not constitute an intent to create a legal obligation or contract between myself and anyone else.   These are merely my opinions and I reserve the right to change them at any time.

Offline bytemaster

Re: 0.4.21 segmentation fault
« Reply #13 on: October 23, 2014, 01:56:19 PM »
Disable Chain Downloader by removing it from your config file.... if in doubt you can delete your config file entirely.
For the latest updates checkout my blog: http://bytemaster.bitshares.org
Anything said on these forums does not constitute an intent to create a legal obligation or contract between myself and anyone else.   These are merely my opinions and I reserve the right to change them at any time.

Offline xeroc

  • Board Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12176
  • ChainSquad GmbH
    • View Profile
    • ChainSquad GmbH
  • BTS: xeroc
  • GitHub: xeroc
Re: 0.4.21 segmentation fault
« Reply #14 on: October 23, 2014, 01:57:15 PM »
What sense does it make to have a RC if you won't give people the time to install and report bugs?
https://github.com/BitShares/bitshares_toolkit/issues/864

We had people file and report bugs internally.
That would be a good approach if you had all different architectures available to test with .. have you?
Give BitShares a try! Use the http://testnet.bitshares.eu provided by http://bitshares.eu powered by ChainSquad GmbH

 

Google+