Yes, but if many questions arise, people cannot vote on them so it forces me to choose on what I (and my biases) believe are the "best". Feel free to ask and ill do my best to port them over myself...but if you have an account please consider posting there
It's an advantage to have you choose the best questions. In this case, you're probably more competent than reddit voters. Don't take the decentralization mantra too far.
Thank but I have no desire to be the (unconstrained) gatekeeper of discussions. If I were a decentralization zealot, I wouldnt moderate
BUT--dont think I dont make my own points (far too loud to refrain!..)
This is literally the first (and to this date, only) conference system available that puts the community's questions first. I am very proud
to say that, and do not plan on changing it any time soon. Think of it as a virtual conference. If people who have their own, more centralized cryptojournalism platforms want to attend, ask their own questions, record and report from them...then EVEN BETTER! That was actually one of the main purposes of this.
Glad to see you coming around, Rune. Your points are awesome. They will no doubt become even better as you grow more versed in the history of this community's creation.