Is it secure to keep my vote and dns in btsx for x years on the genesis block?

Started by merockstar, November 02, 2014, 05:04:27 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

biophil

Quote from: xeroc on November 02, 2014, 05:51:09 PM
Quote from: merockstar on November 02, 2014, 05:04:27 PM
Is there going to be some way around this implemented where the holder gets one transaction to send it to himself before they are frozen until they mature?
You can keep it there ... there will not be a inactivity fee ...
though your genesis stoke is NOT actively voting ..

It's a pretty significant security issue. If PTS keys are compromised, then genesis stakes are compromised.

Sent from my SCH-S720C using Tapatalk 2

Support our research efforts to improve BitAsset price-pegging! Vote for worker 1.14.204 "201907-uccs-research-project."

merockstar

Quote from: xeroc on November 02, 2014, 06:19:17 PM
2 years vesting for vote and dns no matter of they are in the genesis or not

so they'll be tradeable, you just can't trade them in for bitUSD or anything?

xeroc

2 years vesting for vote and dns no matter of they are in the genesis or not

merockstar

Quote from: xeroc on November 02, 2014, 05:51:09 PM
Quote from: merockstar on November 02, 2014, 05:04:27 PM
Is there going to be some way around this implemented where the holder gets one transaction to send it to himself before they are frozen until they mature?
You can keep it there ... there will not be a inactivity fee ...
though your genesis stoke is NOT actively voting ..

will I be forced to keep it there?
are they even still talking about a maturation period or has that been done away with yet?

xeroc

Quote from: merockstar on November 02, 2014, 05:04:27 PM
Is there going to be some way around this implemented where the holder gets one transaction to send it to himself before they are frozen until they mature?
You can keep it there ... there will not be a inactivity fee ...
though your genesis stoke is NOT actively voting ..

merockstar

Is there going to be some way around this implemented where the holder gets one transaction to send it to himself before they are frozen until they mature?