Coindesk Poll - Most Influential

[James212]

Daniel Larimer all the way   +5%

[Gentso1]

"My personal opinion is that you should never vote in a system that is rigged/unprovable on the principle that your "vote" may or may not actually be counted but your participation is certainly counted on to give the result legitimacy."- can't remember who said this, but it applies here.

free marketing.......voted

[bytemaster]

"My personal opinion is that you should never vote in a system that is rigged/unprovable on the principle that your "vote" may or may not actually be counted but your participation is certainly counted on to give the result legitimacy."- can't remember who said this, but it applies here.

:) I agree that this is exactly the case...  +5%

Well in this particular case you cannot even gauge the participation.   

[hrossik]

"My personal opinion is that you should never vote in a system that is rigged/unprovable on the principle that your "vote" may or may not actually be counted but your participation is certainly counted on to give the result legitimacy."- can't remember who said this, but it applies here.

:) I agree that this is exactly the case...  +5%

[bluebit]

 +5%

[NewMine]

"My personal opinion is that you should never vote in a system that is rigged/unprovable on the principle that your "vote" may or may not actually be counted but your participation is certainly counted on to give the result legitimacy."- can't remember who said this, but it applies here.

[pseudoscops]

Voted

[donkeypong]

Me too.

[fuzzy]

Voted for Dan Larimer.   +5%

[testz]

Voted  :)

[matt608]

Done, this is much more useful than the POH awareds, a coindesk article on the winner would have some weight.

[onceuponatime]

Voted for Daniel Larimer

[CLains]

 +5%

[hpenvy]

Let's get voting!

[hpenvy]

"Who has been the most influential person in bitcoin this year? Cast your vote now: http://coinde.sk/1wiIEAG "

Daniel Larimer