Sparkle - Because real money sparkles!

[roselee]

thats it ?  no to be continued ?

i guess there will be a win exe file soon?

[cgafeng]

I share a windows release on dropbox.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/2bqmi1i4c65fz8c/sparkle_client_alpha.4.exe?dl=0

There is a .dll requirement. I'll have to download it again to get a screenshot of which one is missing. Was one I hadn't seen before.

sorry, i found it can't work on other compute, erase.

[Riverhead]

I share a windows release on dropbox.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/2bqmi1i4c65fz8c/sparkle_client_alpha.4.exe?dl=0

There is a .dll requirement. I'll have to download it again to get a screenshot of which one is missing. Was one I hadn't seen before.

[cgafeng]

erase

[mike623317]

Can someone build a windows release?

Just want to say, Yes please sparkles  :D

+5%

[mike623317]

I think sparkle should drop onto BTS holders as well.

I agree with this.

Its an interesting idea. Cant wait to see how this pans out.

[sparkles]

I'm stuck at 263 on both machines that are mining

Did you upgrade and reindex after the latest update?

I am on block 820

Looks like an invalid block at 263

Code Select Expand


>>> blockchain_list_forks
   FORKED BLOCK              FORKING BLOCK ID              SIGNING DELEGATE      TXN COUNT      SIZE           TIMESTAMP   LATENCY   VALID    IN CURRENT CHAIN
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
            262
     00000239fd6da1f1bd74e03aa2e72772d3542064              Unknown Delegate              0        92 2014-11-28T22:29:12      7585     YES                 YES
     0000145d9341af5f197986ac150fde2ab6fa59d4              Unknown Delegate              0        92 2014-11-28T22:28:33      7624      NO                  NO
REASONS FOR INVALID BLOCKS
0000145d9341af5f197986ac150fde2ab6fa59d4: 10 assert_exception: Assert Exception
block_data.difficulty() > difficulty:
    {}
    th_a  chain_database.cpp:734 verify_header

    {"block_data":{"previous":"0000011cd7c99672c63fbc835b3d1f5652b53a5a","version":0,"block_num":263,"timestamp":"2014-11-28T22:28:33","transaction_digest":"c8cf12fe3180ed901a58a0697a522f1217de72d04529bd255627a4ad6164f0f0","nonce":6092,"miner":"SPK7rYgHnMKDYHxuXnN129yVceGYxGgY6yu7","reserved":"","user_transactions":[]}}
    th_a  chain_database.cpp:742 verify_header



I am putting in some code to dampen the difficulty adjustment because it appears to be swinging back and forth too much.   The hard fork will happen on block 10,000 (at ~850 now).    I am also about to release a client that will mine 4x faster (multi-threaded).   

[bitder]

I'm stuck at 263 on both machines that are mining

Did you upgrade and reindex after the latest update?

I am on block 820

Looks like an invalid block at 263

Code Select Expand


>>> blockchain_list_forks
   FORKED BLOCK              FORKING BLOCK ID              SIGNING DELEGATE      TXN COUNT      SIZE           TIMESTAMP   LATENCY   VALID    IN CURRENT CHAIN
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
            262
     00000239fd6da1f1bd74e03aa2e72772d3542064              Unknown Delegate              0        92 2014-11-28T22:29:12      7585     YES                 YES
     0000145d9341af5f197986ac150fde2ab6fa59d4              Unknown Delegate              0        92 2014-11-28T22:28:33      7624      NO                  NO
REASONS FOR INVALID BLOCKS
0000145d9341af5f197986ac150fde2ab6fa59d4: 10 assert_exception: Assert Exception
block_data.difficulty() > difficulty:
    {}
    th_a  chain_database.cpp:734 verify_header

    {"block_data":{"previous":"0000011cd7c99672c63fbc835b3d1f5652b53a5a","version":0,"block_num":263,"timestamp":"2014-11-28T22:28:33","transaction_digest":"c8cf12fe3180ed901a58a0697a522f1217de72d04529bd255627a4ad6164f0f0","nonce":6092,"miner":"SPK7rYgHnMKDYHxuXnN129yVceGYxGgY6yu7","reserved":"","user_transactions":[]}}
    th_a  chain_database.cpp:742 verify_header



[toast]

I did right when you announced second update (alpha3). Restarting got me back in sync.

[sparkles]

I'm stuck at 263 on both machines that are mining

Did you upgrade and reindex after the latest update?

I am on block 820

[toast]

I'm stuck at 263 on both machines that are mining

[Frodo]

Looks like I'm on a fork that is even worse  :(

Code Select Expand


HEIGHT  TIMESTAMP           SIGNING DELEGATE                # TXS   SIZE    LATENCY PROCESSING TIME
===================================================================================================
621     2014-11-29T00:21:24 SPKL6JFtCBGX8uuxuTUxkWD5xbTH... 0       92      0       0.001261       
622     2014-11-29T00:22:09 SPKL6JFtCBGX8uuxuTUxkWD5xbTH... 0       92      0       0.001262       


EDIT:
Just deleted the .Sparkles folder, seems to be better now.

Code Select Expand


HEIGHT  TIMESTAMP           SIGNING DELEGATE                # TXS   SIZE    LATENCY PROCESSING TIME
===================================================================================================
819     2014-11-29T00:37:04 SPKJzo1zPeNzEZtZ8qX99HzGPQ4t... 0       92      6       0.000905       


[Troglodactyl]

12 connections to the test network.  Mining is easy.  Free money.

I can't seem to get more than 5 connections, and difficulty is adjusting downward so I suspect I'm on a minority fork...

Code Select Expand

HEIGHT  TIMESTAMP           SIGNING DELEGATE                # TXS   SIZE    LATENCY PROCESSING TIME
===================================================================================================
665     2014-11-29T00:04:42 SPK5VCe6EBhRbZCtYkBbCpFkgohi... 0       92      0       0.000941   

[sparkles]

12 connections to the test network.  Mining is easy.  Free money.   

[sparkles]

Can someone build a windows release?