New 100% delegate?

[fluxer555]

So it was Nathan that snagged the 'com' username. Unfair :P

[onceuponatime]

Thanks for the responses.  Will vote for him.

[arhag]

Because he is too busying working on a light client.

I don't think it would be that difficult of a proposal to write to get the community to accept him. And he has to start getting paid by the DAC at some point. Hell, I've already voted for him.

Also, same goes to Vikram. He hasn't even registered a 100% paid delegate yet.

[bytemaster]

Proof:
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=8147.msg108194#msg108194: Nathan Hourt controls "modprobe" user on bitsharestalk.org as verified by bytemaster.
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=7566.msg100758#msg100758: "modprobe" confirms control of "delegate.nathanhourt.com" which implies that Nathan Hourt controls the "com" BTS account
By the nature of how BitShares works, Nathan Hourt also controls the "dev.nathanhourt.com"

And as riverhead already mentioned Nathan Hourt is a core dev.

I'm not sure why Nathan didn't just submit an official proposal already...

Because he is too busying working on a light client.

[arhag]

Proof:
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=8147.msg108194#msg108194: Nathan Hourt controls "modprobe" user on bitsharestalk.org as verified by bytemaster.
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=7566.msg100758#msg100758: "modprobe" confirms control of "delegate.nathanhourt.com" which implies that Nathan Hourt controls the "com" BTS account
By the nature of how BitShares works, Nathan Hourt also controls the "dev.nathanhourt.com"

And as riverhead already mentioned Nathan Hourt is a core dev.

I'm not sure why Nathan didn't just submit an official proposal already...

[Riverhead]

Nathan is a core dev.

http://bitshares.org/team/

[onceuponatime]

Who is 100% dev.nathanhourt.com in 147th place with 1.48% vote?

I can't remember seeing this delegate before. Does he have a proposal somewhere?