Author [EN] [ZH] [ES] [PT] [IT] [DE] [FR] [NL] [TR] [SR] [AR] [RU] [EN] [ZH] [ES] [PT] [IT] [DE] [FR] [NL] [TR] [SR] [AR] [RU] [EN] [ZH] [ES] [PT] [IT] [DE] [FR] [NL] [TR] [SR] [AR] [RU] Topic: New 100% delegate?  (Read 383 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline onceuponatime

New 100% delegate?
« on: January 08, 2015, 03:16:53 AM »

Who is 100% dev.nathanhourt.com in 147th place with 1.48% vote?

I can't remember seeing this delegate before. Does he have a proposal somewhere?
« Last Edit: January 08, 2015, 03:43:33 AM by onceuponatime »

Offline Riverhead

Re: New 100% delegate?
« Reply #1 on: January 08, 2015, 03:30:33 AM »
Nathan is a core dev.

http://bitshares.org/team/

Offline arhag

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1213
    • View Profile
    • My posts on Steem
  • BTS: arhag
  • GitHub: arhag
Re: New 100% delegate?
« Reply #2 on: January 08, 2015, 03:34:45 AM »
Proof:
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=8147.msg108194#msg108194: Nathan Hourt controls "modprobe" user on bitsharestalk.org as verified by bytemaster.
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=7566.msg100758#msg100758: "modprobe" confirms control of "delegate.nathanhourt.com" which implies that Nathan Hourt controls the "com" BTS account
By the nature of how BitShares works, Nathan Hourt also controls the "dev.nathanhourt.com"

And as riverhead already mentioned Nathan Hourt is a core dev.

I'm not sure why Nathan didn't just submit an official proposal already...

Offline bytemaster

Re: New 100% delegate?
« Reply #3 on: January 08, 2015, 03:37:49 AM »
Proof:
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=8147.msg108194#msg108194: Nathan Hourt controls "modprobe" user on bitsharestalk.org as verified by bytemaster.
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=7566.msg100758#msg100758: "modprobe" confirms control of "delegate.nathanhourt.com" which implies that Nathan Hourt controls the "com" BTS account
By the nature of how BitShares works, Nathan Hourt also controls the "dev.nathanhourt.com"

And as riverhead already mentioned Nathan Hourt is a core dev.

I'm not sure why Nathan didn't just submit an official proposal already...

Because he is too busying working on a light client.
For the latest updates checkout my blog: http://bytemaster.bitshares.org
Anything said on these forums does not constitute an intent to create a legal obligation or contract between myself and anyone else.   These are merely my opinions and I reserve the right to change them at any time.

Offline arhag

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1213
    • View Profile
    • My posts on Steem
  • BTS: arhag
  • GitHub: arhag
Re: New 100% delegate?
« Reply #4 on: January 08, 2015, 03:40:45 AM »
Because he is too busying working on a light client.

I don't think it would be that difficult of a proposal to write to get the community to accept him. And he has to start getting paid by the DAC at some point. Hell, I've already voted for him.

Also, same goes to Vikram. He hasn't even registered a 100% paid delegate yet.

Offline onceuponatime

Re: New 100% delegate?
« Reply #5 on: January 08, 2015, 03:42:51 AM »
Thanks for the responses.  Will vote for him.

Offline fluxer555

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 667
    • View Profile
Re: New 100% delegate?
« Reply #6 on: January 09, 2015, 06:37:08 PM »
So it was Nathan that snagged the 'com' username. Unfair :P
BTS: boolean-julien

 

Google+