do we have some dev plan for dns(keyid) & vote?

[kenCode]

Besides an extension for the popular browsers, I still really like the little ICQ idea here:
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,15461.0.html

[speedy]

Fork your own browser.

Whats the point in forking a browser or making a plugin if no one will use it? Its a chicken & egg problem - no one will install that new browser because there arent any popular domain names on the blockchain because there's no point registering any.

[betax]

Yes of course, much simpler

[yellowecho]

IMO developing a browser plugin would be a much better option than creating and supporting a whole new browser.

[betax]

Said this before, but anyway: DNS needs partnerships with browsers and/or ISP dns servers before anyone will care about registering a domain name on a blockchain. Mozilla/Chrome would rather do their own dns blockchain in the off-chance that anyone cared about decentralized dns.

Partnering with smaller groups like the TOR project/Pirate Bay might be possible.

Fork your own browser.

[speedy]

Said this before, but anyway: DNS needs partnerships with browsers and/or ISP dns servers before anyone will care about registering a domain name on a blockchain. Mozilla/Chrome would rather do their own dns blockchain in the off-chance that anyone cared about decentralized dns.

Partnering with smaller groups like the TOR project/Pirate Bay might be possible.

[sudo]

dns can bring many users

[kenCode]

I'm pushing for the DNS pretty hard, the govs are not f*ckin around anymore.

Vote for decentralized DNS here:
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,15461.0.html

[sudo]

any progress about dns&vote?

[liondani]

Reminds me of the time when I first read the Satoshi paper ..

That's btw, why I like BitShares most .. no one get's it ....... yet :)

lol
exactly!
If we can't understand it 100%, it must be something HUGE !  :)
future generations will not make efforts to understand it... since they will used to live with it   ;)

[bubble789]

The guy didnt have a specific timeline did he? Or it wasnt detailed and comprehensive enough?

[xeroc]

Reminds me of the time when I first read the Satoshi paper ..

That's btw, why I like BitShares most .. no one get's it ....... yet :)

[svk]

I read the blog spot and sill dont fully comprehend :))

Yea I think that's why it hasn't generated a lot of interest, it's a complex subject with a lot of new things to digest!

[bubble789]

I read the blog post and still dont fully comprehend :))
Edit: typo

[btswildpig]

i have heard  core dev of namecoin  join in our community?

Yes, but they haven't publish their delegate name yet .

[sudo]

i have heard  core dev of namecoin  join in our community?

[svk]

Indolering has a very detailed roadmap in his delegate proposal. It's really awesome and everyone should read it.

Can't find it ,could you please post the link?
Thanks. :)

http://bytemaster.bitshares.org/delegate/2015/01/22/The-Road-to-Universal-p2p-Resolution

[leon]

Indolering has a very detailed roadmap in his delegate proposal. It's really awesome and everyone should read it.

Can't find it ,could you please post the link?
Thanks. :)

[Rune]

Indolering has a very detailed roadmap in his delegate proposal. It's really awesome and everyone should read it.

[sudo]

any roadmap?