Author [EN] [ZH] [ES] [PT] [IT] [DE] [FR] [NL] [TR] [SR] [AR] [RU] [EN] [ZH] [ES] [PT] [IT] [DE] [FR] [NL] [TR] [SR] [AR] [RU] [EN] [ZH] [ES] [PT] [IT] [DE] [FR] [NL] [TR] [SR] [AR] [RU] Topic: "inactivity tax" question  (Read 378 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.


Offline mdj

Re: "inactivity tax" question
« Reply #1 on: March 08, 2015, 07:21:02 PM »
I think that got removed, at least I hope so because its an awful idea!

Offline Troglodactyl

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 936
    • View Profile
Re: "inactivity tax" question
« Reply #2 on: March 08, 2015, 07:56:15 PM »
This was discussed, but does not currently exist and there are no current plans to ever implement it as far as I know.

There are a lot of drawbacks to the idea, but if I remember correctly the main benefit was being able to have a rolling year of blockchain data and throw away anything older than that to trim storage requirements.  Also removing uncertainty about the real supply when some funds are effectively burned because their private keys have been destroyed.

Anyway, the idea is dead.


Offline loszhor

Re: "inactivity tax" question
« Reply #4 on: March 18, 2015, 09:58:35 AM »
    I must agree that the information available on BitShares needs to be updated and simplified. I have found the learning curve on usage very high mostly due to outdated information. Luckily the community has been very helpful but the official information should cover the essentials already. I find that the bulk of the information available mostly deals with what BitShares are but not how to use them.

Offline rgcrypto

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 557
    • View Profile
    • Cryptoctopus Blog
Re: "inactivity tax" question
« Reply #5 on: March 25, 2015, 12:40:01 AM »
Ok, that settles that. Seems there's a lot of outdated info out there (wiki, old blog posts).. perhaps we should address that, it can be confusing to newcomers.

Thank you guys for the replies.

We are doing a Wiki Wesnesday tomorrow, wanna join us?


 

Google+