hey yeah I had a look when you posted it sorry, looks good to me just change " The project generated a good amount of buzz around the proposal, although the original scope and timelines
were has changed since."
Changed to "have", my bad!
sorry, thanks for the article
Where did you get all that information about bitshares? Most of the stuff I've found is still ambiguous.
I've done quite a bit of research into Bitshares and the surrounding ideas. The original bitcointalk thread and the white paper are good starts.
This is good great job we need more of that out there.
The only thing I will argue is, you are saying " the scope and details of the project have been modified". I would say the details changed yes, but not the scope of the project.
Thanks. Actually, the scope has changed along with the details. For example, the initial scope was to include Keyhotee into Bitshares but that was later developed as its own project. DomainShares was also mentioned to be a part of BitShares in the initial announcement. There's nothing wrong at all in changing the scope of such an ambitious project, IMHO. It only shows there is so much potential for future projects!